Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 63, Issue 1, pp 223–236

Using Information on Spatial Variability of Small Estuaries in Designing Large-Scale Estuarine Monitoring Programs

  • Charles J. Strobel
  • John F. Paul
  • Melissa M. Hughes
  • Henry W. Buffum
  • Barbara S. Brown
  • J. Kevin Summers
Article

Abstract

In the early 1990s, EPA's Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) documented the ecological condition of the overall population of small estuaries along the mid-Atlantic coast of the United States. However, the Program did not provide detailed information on the condition of individual estuaries less than 260 km2 in surface area, a group of estuaries of concern to environmental managers. To address the needs of environmental managers, when EMAP returned to the region in summer 1997, it included a study of the spatial variability of ecological indicators within individual small estuaries. At 127 probability-based sites in 10 estuaries, EMAP measured a variety of parameters of water quality and sediments, including dissolved oxygen (DO), nutrients, grain size of sediments, contaminants in sediments, and community structures of benthic macroinvertebrates. From this information the ecological condition (e.g., percent area with DO concentrations below 5mg L−1) for each estuary, along with 90% confidence interval, was determined. The width of the confidence interval was then recalculated for sample sizes ranging from two stations to the total number of stations sampled in that estuary. Confidence interval widths were then plotted against sample size. These plots can be useful in designing future regional monitoring programs with a goal of describing conditions in individual systems as well as broad geographic regions. Results illustrate that beyond five stations per estuary, the reduction in the width of the confidence interval with increasing sampling intensity is relatively small; however, individual program managers need to determine "how small is small enough."

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AZUR Environmental: 1995, Microtox ® Acute Toxicity Solid-Phase Test, AZUR Environmental, Carlsbad, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Long, E.R., D.D. MacDonald, D.D., Smith, S.L. and Calder, F.D.: 1995, ‘Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentrations in marine and estuarine sediments’, Environ. Mgt. 19(1), 81-97.Google Scholar
  3. Long, E.R. and Morgan, L.G.: 1990, The potential for biological effects of sediment-sorbed contaminants tested in the National Status and Trends Program. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS OMA 52. Rockville, MD, US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Service.Google Scholar
  4. Messer, J.J., Linthurst, R.A. and Overton, W.S.: 1991, ‘An EPA Program for Monitoring Ecological Status and Trends’, Environ. Monit. Assess 17, 67-78.Google Scholar
  5. Paul, J.F., Scott, K.J., Gentile, J.H., Schimmel, S.C., Campbell, D.E. and Latimer, R.W.: 1999a, Assessment of Estuarine Conditions in the Virginian Province Using 1990–93 EMAP Data, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Narragansett, RI, in review.Google Scholar
  6. Paul, J.F., Kiddon, J., Strobel, C.J., Melzian, B., Latimer, J., Cobb, Campbell, D. and Brown, B.: 1999b, ‘Condition of the Mid-Atlantic Estuaries: Production of a State of the Environment report’, Environ. Monit. Assess, (this issue).Google Scholar
  7. Schimmel, S.C., Benyi, S.J. and Strobel, C.J.: 1999, ‘Monitoring and Assessment of the Long Island Sound Estuary — 1989–1993’, Environ. Monit. Assess., 56, 27-49.Google Scholar
  8. Schimmel, S.C., Melzian, B.D., Campbell, D.E., Strobel, C.J., Benyi, S.J., Rosen, J.S. and Buffum, H.W.: 1994, Statistical Summary: EMAP-Estuaries Virginian Province-1991, EPA/620/R-94/005, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Narragansett, RI.Google Scholar
  9. Strobel, C.J., Benyi, S.J., Keith, D.J., Buffum, H.W. and Petrocelli, E.A.: 1994, Statistical Summary: EMAP-Estuaries Virginian Province-1992, EPA/620/R-94/019, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Narragansett, RI.Google Scholar
  10. Strobel, C.J., Buffum, H.W., Benyi, S.J., Petrocelli, E.A., Reifsteck, D.R. and Keith, D.J.: 1995, Statistical Summary: EMAP-Estuaries Virginian Province-1990 to 1993, EPA/620/R-94/026, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Narragansett, RI.Google Scholar
  11. Strobel, C.J.: 1998, Mid-Atlantic Integrated Assessment, MAIA-Estuaries Field Operations and Safety Manual, EPA/620/R-98/003, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Environmental Research Laboratory, Narragansett, RI, June 1998.Google Scholar
  12. Strobel C.J., Buffum, H.W., Benyi, S.J. and Paul, J.F.: 1999, ‘Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program: Current Status of Virginian Province (U.S.) Estuaries’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 56, 1-25.Google Scholar
  13. USEPA: 1990, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program Overview, EPA/600/9-90/001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  14. USEPA: 1995, EMAP-Estuaries Laboratory Methods Manual, Volume I — Biological and Physical Analyses, EPA/620/R-95/008, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Narragansett, RI.Google Scholar
  15. USEPA: 1996, Recommended Guidelines for Sampling and Analyses in the Chesapeake Bay Monitoring Program, CBP/TRS 148/96, EPA 903-R-96-006.Google Scholar
  16. USEPA: 1998, Condition of the Mid-Atlantic Estuaries, EPA 600-R-98-147, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  17. Weisberg, S.B., Frithsen, J.B., Holland, A.F., Paul, J.F., Scott, K.J., Summers, J.K., Wilson, H.T., Valente, R.M., Heimbuch, D.G., Gerritsen, J., Schimmel, S.C. and Latimer, R.W.: 1993, EMAP-Estuaries, Virginian Province 1990 Demonstration Project Report, EPA/620/R-93/006, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Narragansett, RI.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles J. Strobel
    • 1
  • John F. Paul
    • 2
  • Melissa M. Hughes
    • 2
  • Henry W. Buffum
    • 2
  • Barbara S. Brown
    • 1
  • J. Kevin Summers
    • 3
  1. 1.Atlantic Ecology DivisionU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyNarragansettUSA
  2. 2.Atlantic Ecology DivisionU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyNarragansettUSA
  3. 3.Gulf Ecology Division, Sabine IslandU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyGulf BreezeUSA

Personalised recommendations