Plant Molecular Biology

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 387–396

Isolation and characterization of two pathogen- and salicylic acid-induced genes encoding WRKY DNA-binding proteins from tobacco

  • Chunhong Chen
  • Zhixiang Chen


A pathogen- and salicylic acid (SA)-induced DNA-binding activity has been recently identified in tobacco that is related to a previously identified class of WRKY DNA-binding proteins. To identify members of the WRKY gene family associated with this DNA-binding activity, we have attempted to isolate those WRKY genes that are induced by pathogen infection. Using a domain-specific differential display procedure, we have isolated two tobacco WRKY genes, tWRKY3 and tWRKY4, that are rapidly induced in resistant tobacco plants after infection by tobacco mosaic virus (TMV). Both tWRK3 and tWRKY4 encode proteins with a single WRKY domain that contain the conserved WRKYGQK sequence. Unlike other isolated WRKY proteins that contain the Cys2His2 zinc motif, tWRKY3 and tWRKY4 appear to contain the Cys2HisCys zinc motif. Nonetheless, both tWRKY3 and tWRKY4 are capable of binding DNA molecules with the W-box (TTGAC) element recognized by other WRKY proteins. Expression of the tWRKY3 and tWRKY4 genes could be rapidly induced not only by TMV infection but also by SA or its biologically active analogues that are capable of inducing pathogenesis-related genes and enhanced resistance. Interestingly, induction of both genes by TMV infection was still observed in resistant tobacco plants expressing the bacterial salicylate hydroxylase gene (nahG), although the levels of induction appeared to be reduced. Identification of pathogen- and SA-induced genes encoding WRKY DNA-binding proteins should facilitate future studies on the regulation and functions of this novel group of DNA-binding proteins.

gene expression hypersensitive responses plant defense responses salicylic acid tobacco mosaic virus WRKY DNA-binding proteins 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Chen, Z., Silvan, H. and Klessig, D.F. 1991. Active oxygen species in the induction of plant systemic acquired resistance by salicylic acid. Science 262: 1883–1886.Google Scholar
  2. Clarke, N.D. and Berg, J.M. 1998. Zinc fingers in Caenorhabditis elegans: finding families and probing pathways. Science 282: 2018–2022.Google Scholar
  3. Conrath, U., Chen, Z., Ricigliano, J.W. and Klessig, D.F. 1995. Two inducers of plant defense responses, 2,6-dichloroisonicotinic acid and salicylic acid, inhibit catalase activity in tobacco. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 7143–7147.Google Scholar
  4. de Pater, S., Greco, V., Pham, K., Memelink, J. and Kijne, J. 1996. Characterization of a zinc-dependent transcriptional activator from Arabidopsis. Nucl. Acids Res. 24: 4624–4631.Google Scholar
  5. Despres, C., Subramaniam, R., Matton, D.P. and Brisson, N. 1995. The activation of the potato PR-10a gene requires the phosphorylation of the nuclear factor PBF-1. Plant Cell 7: 589–598.Google Scholar
  6. Enyedi, A., Yalpani, N., Silverman, P. and Raskin, I. 1992. Localization, conjugation and function of salicylic acid in tobacco during the hypersensitive reaction to tobacco mosaic virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 2480–2484.Google Scholar
  7. Friedrich, L., Vernooij, B., Gaffney, T., Morse, A. and Ryals, J. 1995. Characterization of tobacco plants expressing a bacterial salicylate hydroxylase gene. Plant Mol. Biol. 29: 959–968.Google Scholar
  8. Fukuda, Y. 1997. Interaction of tobacco nuclear protein with an elicitor-responsive element in the promoter of a basic class I chitinase gene. Plant Mol. Biol. 34: 81–87.Google Scholar
  9. Fukuda, Y. and Shinshi, H. 1994. Characterization of a novel cisacting element that is responsive to a fungal elicitor in the promoter of a tobacco class I chitinase gene. Plant Mol. Biol. 24: 485–493.Google Scholar
  10. Green, P.J., Kay, S.A. and Chua, N.H. 1987. Sequence-specific interactions of a pea nuclear factor with light-responsive elements upstream of the rbcS-3A gene. EMBO J. 6: 2543–2549.Google Scholar
  11. Hahn, K. and Strittmatter, G. 1994. Pathogen-defence gene prp1-1 from potato encodes an auxin-responsive glutathione Stransferase. Eur. J. Biochem. 226: 619–626Google Scholar
  12. Kombrink, E. and Somssich, I.E. 1997. Pathogenesis-related proteins and plant defense. In: G. Carroll and P. Tudzynski (Eds.), TheMycota Part A, Plant Relationships, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 107–128.Google Scholar
  13. Malamy, J. Hennig, J. and Klessig, D.F. 1992. Temperaturedependent induction of salicylic acid and its conjugates during the resistance response to tobacco mosaic virus infection. Plant Cell 4: 359—366.Google Scholar
  14. Raventos, D., Jensen, A.B., Rask, M.B., Casacuberta, J.M., Mundy, J. and San Segundo, B. 1995. A 20 bp cis-acting element is both necessary and sufficient to mediate elicitor response of a maize PRms gene. Plant J. 7: 147–155.Google Scholar
  15. Rushton, P.J. and Somssich, I.E. 1998. Transcriptional control of plant genes responsive to pathogens. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1: 311–315.Google Scholar
  16. Rushton, P.J., Macdonald, H., Huttly, A.K., Lazarus, C.M. and Hooley, R. 1995. Members of a new family of DNA-binding proteins bind to a conserved cis-element in the promoters of α-Amy2 genes. Plant Mol. Biol. 29: 691–702.Google Scholar
  17. Rushton, P.J., Torres, J.T., Parniske, M., Wernert, P., Hahlbrock, K. and Somssich, I.E. 1996. Interaction of elicitor-induced DNAbinding proteins with elicitor response elements in the promoters of parsley PR1 genes. EMBO J. 15: 5690–500.Google Scholar
  18. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F. and Maniatis, T. 1989. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.Google Scholar
  19. Schubert, R., Fischer, R., Hain, R., Schreier, P.H., Bahnweg, G., Ernst, D. and Sandermann, H. Jr. 1997. An ozone-responsive region of the grapevine resveratrol synthase promoter differs from the basal pathogen-responsive sequence. Plant Mol. Biol. 34: 417–426.Google Scholar
  20. Somssich, I.E. and Hahlbrock, K. 1998. Pathogen defense in plants: a paradigm of biological complexity. Trends Plant Sci. 3: 86–90.Google Scholar
  21. van der Biezen, E.A. and Jones, J.D. 1998. Plant disease-resistance proteins and the gene-for-gene concept. Trends Biochem.. Sci. 23: 454–456.Google Scholar
  22. Wang, Z., Yang, P., Fan, B. and Chen, Z. 1998. An oligo selection procedure for identification of sequence-specific DNA-binding activities associated with the plant defense response. Plant J. 16: 515–522.Google Scholar
  23. Warner, S.A., Scott, R. and Draper, J. 1993. Isolation of an asparagus intracellular PR gene (AoPR1) wound-responsive promoter by the inverse polymerase chain reaction and its characterization in transgenic tobacco. Plant J. 3: 191–201.Google Scholar
  24. Warner, S.A., Gill, A. and Draper, J. 1994. The developmental expression of the asparagus intracellular PR protein (AoPR1) gene correlates with sites of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. Plant J. 6: 31–43.Google Scholar
  25. Whitham, S., McCormick, S. and Baker, B. 1996. The N gene of tobacco confers resistance to tobacco mosaic virus in transgenic tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 8776–8781.Google Scholar
  26. Yang, Y., Shah, J. and Klessig, D.F. 1997. Signal perception and transduction in plant defense responses. Genes Dev. 11: 1621–1639.Google Scholar
  27. Yang, P., Wang, Z., Fan, B., Chen, C. and Chen, Z. 1999. A pathogen-and salicylic acid-induced WRKY DNA-binding activity recognizes the elicitor response element of the tobacco class I chitinase gene promoter. Plant J. 18: 141–149.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chunhong Chen
    • 1
  • Zhixiang Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Microbiology, Molecular Biology and BiochemistryUniversity of IdahoMoscowUSA

Personalised recommendations