Advertisement

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 65, Issue 3, pp 531–546 | Cite as

Parameters Influencing Sediments Resuspension and the Link to Sorption of Inorganic Compounds

  • Eid Alkhatib
  • Keith Castor
Article

Abstract

In the aquatic environment, the accumulation of chemicalcontaminants by sediments poses a potential threat to endemiclife forms and drinking water resources. Trace metals such asCd, Cu, Cr, Ni, Pb, and toxic organic compounds, are among awide variety of contaminants having an affinity for sediments.In this study, experiments were performed simulating sedimentresuspension in the lower Housatonic River, Connecticut, using aParticle Entrainment Simulator. Analyses of grain sizedistributions, porosities and total organic contents of thesediments suggested that these parameters influence theredistribution and entrainment of settleable solids in the watercolumn. These findings were established by evaluating the impactof one parameter on sediment resuspension as a function ofstream flow with the other two characteristics being heldconstant. Total suspended solids and volatile suspended solidsresuspension concentration ranged from 3.2 to 20648.3 mg L-1,and 1.5 to 1823.8 mg L-1, respectively, with subsequentincreases in flow rates from 9 to 6 dynes cm-2. The resuspension concentrations were augmentedby sediment porosity (22.0 to 57.5%), percent finer grain-size distributions at 0.1 mm, and total organic content (2.7 g kg-1 to 29.0 g kg-1). Using Kp values, and the dissolvedcontaminant levels of various trace metals, the particulatecontaminant levels of the metals were determined under variousoscillation rates. As sediment resuspension increased withincreased stream flow, there was an overall general increasefrom 0.02 to 33.6 μg L-1 in the particulatecontaminant levels of Cd, Cu, Cr, Ni and Pb.

sediments resuspension partition coefficient heavymetals 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alkhatib, E. and Castor, K.: 1997, 'Impact and remediation of contaminated bottom sediments in rivers', ACS, Environ. Chemistry Division, Vol. 37, No. 32.Google Scholar
  2. Alkhatib, E. and Wright, R.: 1991, 'A Study of the Blackstone River. Internal Report', University of Rhode Island. Civil Engineering Department.Google Scholar
  3. Arakel, A. V.: 1995, 'Towards developing sediment quality assessment guidelines for aquatic systems: An Australian perspective', Australian Journal of Earth Science 42.Google Scholar
  4. Eaton, D., Andrew, Clesceri, S. Lenore and Greenberg, E. Arnold: 1995, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th ed., American Public Health Association, 105 Fifteenth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005.Google Scholar
  5. Fetter, C. W.: 1995, Applied Hydrology, 3rd ed., University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 06732.Google Scholar
  6. Frink, C. R., Sawhney, B. L., Kulp, K. P. and Fredette, C. G.: 1982, 'Polychlorinated biphenyls in the Housatonic River, sediments in Massachusetts and Connecticut. Determination, Distribution and Transport, A cooperative study by the Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, and the U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  7. Horowitz, A. J. and Elrick, K. A.: 1988, 'Interpretation of Bed Sediment Trace Metal Data: Methods of Dealing with the Grain-Size Effect', in Lichtenberg, J. J.,Winter, J. A.,Weber, C. I. and Franklin, L. (eds.), Chemical and Biological Characteristics of Sludges, Sediments, Dredge Spoils and Drilling Muds, ASTM STP, No. 976.Google Scholar
  8. Kontaxis, T. Michael, M. Dominic and O'Connor, J. Donald: 1982, 'Water Sediment Partition Coefficients for Priority Metals', USEPA, 625/6-74-003.Google Scholar
  9. Lee Dong-Young, Link Wilbert, Whan Kang See: 1981, 'The Entrainment and Deposition of Fine-Grained Sediments in Lake Erie', Journal of Great Lake Resources.Google Scholar
  10. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: 1994, 'ARCS Assessment Guidance Document', EPA 905-B94-002, Chicago, 111, Great Lakes Program Office, Washington State Department of Ecology.Google Scholar
  11. U.S. Geological Survey: 1981, 'Water Resources Data for Connecticut, U.S.', Geological Survey-Water-Data Report, CT-96-1.Google Scholar
  12. U.S. Geological Survey: 1996, 'Water Resources Data for Connecticut, U.S.', Geological Survey-Water-Data Report, CT-80-1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eid Alkhatib
    • 1
  • Keith Castor
    • 2
  1. 1.Chemistry DepartmentSacred Heart UniversityFairfieldU.S.A.
  2. 2.Chemistry DepartmentSacred Heart UniversityFairfieldU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations