Plant Molecular Biology

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 79–92 | Cite as

Molecular evolution of the chalcone synthase multigene family in the morning glory genome

  • Mary L. Durbin
  • Bonnie McCaig
  • Michael T. Clegg


Plant genomes appear to exploit the process of gene duplication as a primary means of acquiring biochemical and developmental flexibility. Thus, for example, most of the enzymatic components of plant secondary metabolism are encoded by small families of genes that originated through duplication over evolutionary time. The dynamics of gene family evolution are well illustrated by the genes that encode chalcone synthase (CHS), the first committed step in flavonoid biosynthesis. We review pertinent facts about CHS evolution in flowering plants with special reference to the morning glory genus, Ipomoea. Our review shows that new CHS genes are recruited recurrently in flowering plant evolution. Rates of nucleotide substitution are frequently accelerated in new duplicate genes, and there is clear evidence for repeated shifts in enzymatic function among duplicate copies of CHS genes. In addition, we present new data on expression patterns of CHS genes as a function of tissue and developmental stage in the common morning glory (I. purpurea). These data show extensive differentiation in gene expression among duplicate copies of CHS genes. We also show that a single mutation which blocks anthocyanin biosynthesis in the floral limb is correlated with a loss of expression of one of the six duplicate CHS genes present in the morning glory genome. This suggests that different duplicate copies of CHS have acquired specialized functional roles over the course of evolution. We conclude that recurrent gene duplication and subsequent differentiation is a major adaptive strategy in plant genome evolution.

anthocyanin chalcone synthase gene duplication Ipomoea rate of nucleotide substitution stilbene synthase 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Axelsen KB, Palmgren MG: Evolution of substrate specificities in the P-type ATPase superfamily. J Mol Evol 46: 84–101 (1998).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beerhues L, Robeneck H, Wiermann R: Chalcone synthases from spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). Planta 173: 544–553 (1988).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Christensen AB, Gregersen PL, Schröder J, Collinge DB: A chalcone synthase with an unusual substrate preference is expressed in barley leaves in response to UV light and pathogen attack. Plant Mol Biol 37: 849–857 (1998).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clegg MT, Cummings ML, Durbin ML: The evolution of plant nuclear genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 7791–7798 (1997).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Debnam PM, Shearer G, Blackwood L, Kohl DH: Evidence for channeling of intermediates in the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway by soybean and pea nodule extracts, yeast extracts, and purified yeast enzymes. Eur J Biochem 246: 283–290 (1997).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Durbin ML, Learn GH, Huttley GA, Clegg MT: Evolution of the chalcone synthase gene family in the genus Ipomoea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 3338–3342 (1995).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ennos RA, Clegg MT: Flower color variation in the morning glory, Ipomoea purpurea. J Hered 74: 247–250 (1983).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Epperson BK, Clegg MT: Genetics of flower color polymorphism in the common morning glory (Ipomoea purpurea). J Hered 79: 64–69 (1988).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Epperson BK, Clegg MT: Unstable white flower color genes and their derivatives in the morning glory. J Hered 83: 405–409 (1992).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fukada-Tanaka S, Hoshino A, Hisatomi Y, Habu Y, Hasebe M, Iida S: Identification of new chalcone synthase genes for flower pigmentation in the Japanese and common morning glories. Plant Cell Physiol 38: 754–758 (1997).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gaut BS, Morton BR, McCaig BC, Clegg MT: Substitution rate comparisons between grasses and palms: synonymous rate differences at the nuclear gene Adh parallel rate differences at the plastid gene rbcL. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 10274–10279 (1996).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gottlieb O: Phytochemicals: differentiation and function. Phytochemistry 29: 1715–1724 (1990).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Habu, Y, Fukada-Tanaka, S, Hisatomi Y, Iida, S: Amplified restriction fragment length polymorphism-based mRNA fingerprinting using a single restriction enzyme that recognizes a 4-bp sequence. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 234: 516–521 (1997).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Habu, Y, Hisatomi Y, Iida S: Molecular characterization of the mutable flaked allele for flower variegation in the common morning glory. Plant J 16: 371–376 (1998).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Helariutta Y, Kotilainen M, Elomaa P, Kalkkinen N, Bremer K, Teeri TH, Albert VA: Duplication and functional divergence in the chalcone synthase gene family of Asteraceae: evolution with substrate change and catalytic simplification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 9033–9038 (1996).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hrazdina G, Zobel AM, Hoch HC: Biochemical, immunological and immunocytochemical evidence for the association of chalcone synthase with endoplasmic reticulum membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 8966–8970 (1987).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hrazdina G, Jensen RA: Spatial organization of enzymes in plant metabolic pathways. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 43: 241–267 (1992).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huttley GA, Durbin ML, Glover DE, Clegg MT: Nucleotide polymorphism in the chalcone synthase: A locus and evolution of the chalcone synthase multigene family of common morning glory Ipomoea purpurea. Mol Ecol 6: 549–558 (1997).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ibrahim RK, Varin L: Flavonoid enzymology. Meth Plant Biochem 9: 99–131 (1993).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Imai Y: Analysis of flower colour in Pharbitis nil. J Genet 24: 203–224 (1931).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jukes TH, Cantor CR: Evolution of protein molecules. In: Mums HN (ed), Mammalian Protein Metabolism, pp. 21–132. Academic Press, New York (1969).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kimura M: A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16: 111–120 (1980).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Koes RE, Spelt CE, Mol JNM, Gerats AG: The chalcone synthase multigene family of Petunia hybrida (V30): sequence homology, chromosomal localization and evolutionary aspects. Plant Mol Biol 10: 159–169 (1987).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Koes RE, Spelt CE, Mol JNM: The chalcone synthase multigene family of Petunia hybrida (V30): differential, lightregulated expression during flower development and UV light induction. Plant Mol Biol 12: 213–225 (1989).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Koes RE, Spelt CE, van den Elzen PJM, Mol JNM: Cloning and molecular characterization of the chalcone synthase multigene family of Petunia hybrida. Gene 81: 245–257 (1989).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Koes RE, Quattrocchio F, Mol JNM: The flavonoid biosynthetic pathway in plants: function and evolution. BioEssays 16: 123–132 (1994).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M: MEGA: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis, version 1.0. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 (1993).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li P, Bousquet J: Relative-rate test for nucleotide substitutions between two lineages. Mol Biol Evol 9: 1185–1189 (1992).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li W-H: Molecular Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA (1997).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1982).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Martin CR: Structure, function, and regulation of the chalcone synthase. Int Rev Cytol 147: 233–284 (1993).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Muse SV, Gaut BS: A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates, with application to the chloroplast genome. Mol Biol Evol 11: 715–724 (1994).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    O'Neill SD, Tong Y, Sprolein B, Forkmann G, Yoder J: Molecular genetic analysis of chalcone synthase in Lycopersicon esculentum and an anthocyanin-deficient mutant. Mol Gen Genet 224: 279–288 (1990).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ryder TB, Hedrick SA, Bell JN, Liang X, Clouse SD, Lamb CJ: Organization and differential activation of a gene family encoding the plant defense enzyme CHS in Phaseolus vulgaris. Mol Gen Genet 210: 219–233 (1987).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Saslowsky DE, Shirley BW: Immunolocalization of two flavonoid enzymes. In: Arabidopsis. 9th International Conference on Arabidopsis Research, p. 108. University of Wisconsin-Madison (1998).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schröder J: A family of plant-specific polyketide synthases: facts and predictions. Trends Plant Sci 2: 373–378 (1997).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schröder J, Raiber S, Berger T, Schmidt A, Schmidt J, Soares-Sello A, Bardshiri E, Strack D, Simpson TJ, Veit M, Schröder G: Plant polyketide synthases: a chalcone synthasetype enzyme which performs a condensation reaction with methylmalonyl-CoA in the biosynthesis of C-methylated chalcones. Biochemistry 37: 8417–8425 (1998).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sommer H, Saedler H: Structure of the chalcone synthase gene of Antirrhinum majus. Mol Gen Genet 202: 429–434 (1986).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Srere PA, Sümegi B, Sherry AD: Organizational aspects of the citric acid cycle. Biochem Soc Symp 54: 173–182 (1987).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Srivastava DK, Bernhard SA: Metabolite transfer via enzymeenzyme complexes. Science 234: 1081–1084 (1986).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Stafford HA: Flavonoid evolution: an enzymic approach. Plant Physiol 96: 680–685 (1991).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ: Clustal W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight-matrix choice. Nucl Acids Res 22: 4673–4680 (1994).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tiffin P, Miller R, Rausher M: Control of expression patterns of anthocyanin structural genes by two loci in the common morning glory. Genes Genet Syst 73: 105–110 (1998).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tropf S, Lanz T, Rensing SA, Schröder J, Schröder G: Evidence that stilbene synthases have developed from chalcone synthases several times in the course of evolution. J Mol Evol 38: 610–618 (1994).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tropf S, Kärcher B, Schröder G, Schröder J: Reaction mechanisms of homodimeric plant polyketide synthases (stilbene and chalcone synthase). A single active site for the condensing reaction is sufficient for synthesis of stilbenes, chalcones, and 6'-deoxychalcones. J Biol Chem 270: 7922–7928 (1995).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Walsh JB: How often do duplicated genes evolve new functions? Genetics 139: 421–428 (1995).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary L. Durbin
    • 1
  • Bonnie McCaig
    • 1
  • Michael T. Clegg
    • 1
  1. 1.Botany and Plant Sciences DepartmentUniversity of CaliforniaRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations