Policy guidelines for the utilization of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections: the UNC SPORE experience
- 61 Downloads
Paraffin blocks represent a valuable resource that has allowed investigators to apply today's technology to address scientific questions in a shorter period of time and in more diverse populations than would have been possible with fresh or frozen tissue. However, in addition to being an exhaustible resource, there is concern regarding the appropriate use of these tissues, both with respect to medical or legal considerations and quality control and quality assurance practices. We describe policy guidelines to address these concerns, including: safeguards to address medical/legal and patient confidentiality issues, quality control and quality assurance for tissue sectioning, processing and storage, database management for sample tracking, and scientific review for utilization of specimens. These policies and procedures have been developed and implemented by the University of North Carolina (UNC) Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in the Breast Cancer Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Core laboratory, in collaboration with our study pathologists, participants, and research investigators. It is our hope that the information and experience described here may stimulate discussion that can ultimately lead to a uniform policy for handling formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues in research.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Liu E: The Specialized program of research excellence in breast cancer at the University of Chapel Hill. Breast Cancer Res Treat 35(51): 1–5, 1995Google Scholar
- 2.Newman B, Moorman PG, Millikan R, et al.: The Carolina breast cancer study: integrating population-based epidemiology and molecular biology. Breast Cancer Res Treat 35: 51–60, 1995Google Scholar
- 3.Aldrich TE, Vann D, Moorman PG, Newman B: Rapid reporting of cancer incidence in a population-based study of breast cancer: one constructive use of a central cancer registry. Breast Cancer Res Treat 35: 61–64, 1995Google Scholar
- 4.Certificate of confidentiality. Public Health Service (PHS) Act (42U.S.C. 242m(d)). Individually identified data protected under Section 301(d). 'For defense against subpoenas, court orders and other externally compelled disclosures of healthresearch data', the Public Health Service Act provides that legal-confidentiality protection may be issued. Currently protection of this kind is granted in the form of 'Certificates of confidentiality obtained from the Secretary of Health and Human Services'.Google Scholar
- 5.Dressler LG: Genetic testing for the BRCA1 gene and the need for protection from discrimination: an evolving legislative and social issue. Int J Breast Disease 10: 127–135, 1998Google Scholar
- 6.Prioleau J, Schnitt SJ: P53 antigen loss in stored paraffin slides. N Engl J Med 332: 1521–1522, 1995Google Scholar
- 7.Shin HJC, Kalapurakal SK, Lee J, Ro JY, Hong WK, Lee JS: Comparison of p53 immunoreactivity in fresh cut versus stored slides with and without microwave heating. Mod Pathol 10: 224–230, 1997Google Scholar
- 8.Dressler LG, Seamer LA: Standards, controls and histogram interpretation in clinical flow cytometry. In: Darzynkiewics Z, Robinson P, Crissman H (eds) Methods in Cell Biology, Vol. 41, 2nd edition. Academic Press, 1994Google Scholar
- 9.This work was presented in part as a poster presentation at the Breast cancer symposium, San Antonio, Tx, 1997: Dressler, LG, Burroughs M, Cowan D, Geradts J, Millikan R, Newman B. Policy guidelines for the utilization, processing and storage of formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue sections for immunohistochemistry and molecular analysis, 20th annual breast cancer symposium, Breast Cancer Res Treat vol. 46, Supplement. Abstract #384.Google Scholar