Experimental & Applied Acarology

, Volume 23, Issue 11, pp 915–928 | Cite as

Sequential Histopathology at the Rhipicephalus Sanguineus Tick Feeding Site on Dogs and Guinea Pigs

  • M.P.J. Szabó
  • G.H. Bechara


The tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus is a very common parasite of dogs worldwide. Dogs seem unable to acquire resistance against this tick species, whereas guinea pigs demonstrate a very strong resistance following primary infestation. We studied the inflammatory reaction at the R. sanguineus tick feeding site on dogs and guinea pigs during primary and tertiary infestations at different time intervals after attachment. Biopsies were collected after 4, 24, 48 and 96 hours. Changes that were found in all experimental groups included a cone of cement around the mouthparts of the tick, epidermal hyperplasia, edema and inflammatory cell infiltration in the dermis directly underneath the tick attachment site. Dogs reacted to ticks mainly with neutrophils, particularly after repeated exposure. Mast cells and mononuclear leukocytes were also present. Guinea pigs reacted to R. sanguineus mainly with mononuclear cells, eosinophils and basophils. These cells were particularly numerous after repeated exposure to R. sanguineus. Our results suggest that basophils and eosinophils are involved in resistance of guinea pigs to R. sanguineus and that neutrophils in dogs have little effect against this tick species.

histopathology leukocytes dog guinea pig resistance tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bechara, G.H., Szabó, M.P.J., Mukai, L.S. and Rosa, P.C.S. 1994. Immunisation of dogs, hamsters and guinea pigs against Rhipicephalus sanguineus using crude unreleased adult tick extracts. Vet. Parasitol. 52: 79–90.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, S.J., Galli, J.S., Gleich, G.J. and Askenase, P.W. 1982. Ablation of immunity to Amblyomma americanum by anti-basophil serum: cooperation between basophils and eosinophils in expression of immunity to ectoparasites (ticks) in guinea-pigs. J. Immunol. 129(2): 790–796.Google Scholar
  3. Chabaud, A.G. 1950. L'infestation par des ixodinés provoque-t-elle une immunité chez l-hôte (2me note). Ann. Parasitol. 25(5–6): 474–479.Google Scholar
  4. Comer, K.M. 1988. Carpet deodorizer as a contact allergen in a dog. J.A.V.M.A. 193: 1553–1554.Google Scholar
  5. Cotran, R.S., Kumar, V. and Robbins, S.L. 1994. Inflammation and Repair. In: Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease, R.S. Cotran, V. Kumar and S.L. Robbins (eds). W.B. Saunders Company, 5th ed.Google Scholar
  6. Dumler, J.S. and Bakken, J.S. 1998. Human ehrlichioses: newly recognized infections transmitted by ticks. Annual Ver. Med. 49: 201–213.Google Scholar
  7. Fielden, L.J., Rechav, Y. and Bryson, N.R. 1992. Acquired immunity to larvae of Amblyomma marmoreum and A. hebraeum by tortoises, guinea-pigs and guinea-fowl. Med. Vet. Entomol. 6: 251–254.Google Scholar
  8. Freitas, M.G., Costa, H.M.A., Costa, J.O. and Iide, P. 1978. Entomologia e Acarologia Médica e Veterinária. Editora Rabelo e Brasil, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.Google Scholar
  9. Galkowska, H. and Olszewski, W.L. 1986. Cellular composition of lymph in experimental lymphedema. Lymphology 19: 139–145.Google Scholar
  10. Galkowska, H., Dabrowski, M. and Olszewski, W.L. 1989. Spontaneously active suppressive cells in the canine peripheral blood. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 20: 101–108.Google Scholar
  11. Giorgi, R., Pagano, R.L., Dias, M.A., Aguiar-Passeti, T., Sorg, C. and Mariano, M. 1998. Antinociceptive effect of the calcium-binding protein MRP-14 and the role played by neutrophils on the control of inflammatory pain. J. Leukoc. Biol. 64(2): 214–220.Google Scholar
  12. Halliwell, R.E.W. and Schemmer, R.K. 1987 The role of basophils in the immunopathogenesis of hypersensitivity to fleas (Ctenocephalides felis) in dogs. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol.15: 203–13.Google Scholar
  13. Inokuma, H., Hara, Y., Aita, T. and Onishi, T. 1997. Effect of infestation with Rhipicephalus sanguineus on neutrophil function in dogs. Med. Vet. Entomol. 11: 401–403.Google Scholar
  14. Jain, N.C. 1986. The neutrophils. In: Schalm's Veterinary Hematology, 4th Edn, pp. 676–730. Lea and Feibiger Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  15. Lloyd, A.R. and Oppenheim, J.J. 1992. Poly's lament: the neglected role of the polymorphonuclear neutrophil in the afferent limb of the immune response. Immunol. Today 13(5): 169–172.Google Scholar
  16. Luft, J.H. 1961. Improvements in epoxi resin embedding methods. J. Biochem. Cytol. 9: 409–417.Google Scholar
  17. Moller, A., Lippert, U., Lessmann, D., Kolde, G., Hamann, K., Welker, P., Schadendorf, D., Rosenbach, T., Luger, T. and Czarnetzki, B.M. 1993. Human mast cells produce Il-8. J. Immunol. 151(6): 3261–3266.Google Scholar
  18. Paine, S.H., Kemp, D.H. and Allen, J.R. 1983. In vitro feeding of Dermacentor andersoni (Stiles): effects of histamine and other mediators. Parasitology 86: 419–428.Google Scholar
  19. Pegram, R.G., Clifford, C.M., Walker, J.B. and Keirans, J.E. 1987. Clarification of the Rhipicephalus sanguineus group (Acari, Ixodoidea, Ixodidae). I. R. sulcatus (Neuman, 1908) and R. turanicus (Pomerantsev, 1936). Sys. Parasitol 10: 3–26.Google Scholar
  20. Randolph, S.E. 1979. Population regulation in ticks: the role of acquired resistance in natural and unnatural hosts. Parasitology 79: 141–156.Google Scholar
  21. Rechav, Y. 1992. Naturally acquired resistance to ticks — a global view. Insect. Sci. Applic. 13(4): 405–504.Google Scholar
  22. Ribeiro, J.M.C. 1989. Role of saliva in tick/host interactions. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 7: 15–20.Google Scholar
  23. Ribeiro, J.M.C., Weiss, J.J. and Telford III, S.R. 1990. Saliva of the tick Ixodes dammini inhibits neutrophil function. Exp. Parasitol. 70: 382–8.Google Scholar
  24. Scepek, S., Moqbel, R. and Lindau, M. 1994. Compound exocytosis and cumulative degranulation by eosinophils and their role in parasite killing. Parasitol. Today 10(7): 276–278.Google Scholar
  25. Szabó, M.P.J. and Bechara, G.H. 1995. An insight into the histopathology caused by the tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Acarina: Ixodidae) in the skin of previously infested, vaccinated or tick-bite naive dogs, guinea pigs and hamsters. Braz. J. vet. Res. anim. Sci. 32(1): 37–42.Google Scholar
  26. Szabó, M.P.J., Morelli Jr., J. and Bechara, G.H. 1995a. Cutaneous hypersensitivity induced in dogs and guinea pigs by extracts of the tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Acari: Ixodidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 19: 723–730.Google Scholar
  27. Szabó, M.P.J., Mukai, L.S., Rosa, P.C.S. and Bechara, G.H. 1995b. Differences in the acquired resistance of dogs, hamsters, and guinea pigs to repeated infestations with adult ticks Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Acari: Ixodidae). Braz. J. vet. Res. anim. Sci. 32(1): 43–50.Google Scholar
  28. Theis, J.H. and Budwiser, P.D. 1974. Rhipicephalus sanguineus: sequential histopathology at the hostarthropode interface. Exp. Parasitol. 36: 77–105.Google Scholar
  29. Walker, A.R. and Fletcher, J.D. 1986. Histological study of the attachment sites of adult Rhipicephalus appendiculatus on rabbits and cattle. Int. J. Parasitol. 16: 399–413.Google Scholar
  30. Wikel, S.K. 1996. Immunology of the tick-host interface. In: The immunology of Host-ectoparasitic arthropod relationships, S.K. Wikel (ed.), pp. 204–231. Cab International, UK. pp. 204–231.Google Scholar
  31. Weiss, S.J. 1989. Tissue destruction by neutrophils. N. Engl. J. Med. 320(6): 365–376.Google Scholar
  32. Zucker-Franklin, D. 1990. Eosinophils: Morphology, production, chemistry and function. In: Hematology, W.J. Williams, E. Beutler, A.J. Erslev and M.A. Lichtman, (eds), 4th edn, pp. 835–855. McGraw-Hill, Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • M.P.J. Szabó
  • G.H. Bechara

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations