Advertisement

Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 49, Issue 3, pp 275–288 | Cite as

The farming system and traditional agroforestry systems in the Maya community of San Jose, Belize

Article

Abstract

Shifting slash-and-burn agriculture is likely one of the main causes of forest degradation in southern Belize. Although many development projects have attempted to reduce the impacts of agriculture on the tropical rainforest, the situation is still a cause for concern. A study of the farming system of the San Jose Maya community was therefore carried out to examine agricultural production in its social, cultural, economic, and political context. Results demonstrate that agricultural production contributes to forest degradation because of the limited availability of agricultural land, the low level of investment in agricultural production, the land tenure system, limited marketing opportunities, and the exclusion of Mayas from the country's political and economic domains. Agroforestry could, however, offer a partial solution to the problem of forest degradation. Three types of traditional agroforestry systems are practised in San Jose: the milpa (a slash-and-burn agriculture system), cacao (Theobroma cacao) cultivation under shade trees, and the homegarden. These traditional agroforestry systems almost entirely meet a family's needs for food and wood, and generate at least 62% of family income. Improving the productivity of these systems could help to reduce pressure on the forest in southern Belize.

cacoa homegarden household perspectives milpa participatory observation qualitative research 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arya L and Pulver EL (1993) On-site appraisal of target areas for sustainable agriculture production activities. Natural Resource Management Protection Project (NARMAP), Belmopan, BelizeGoogle Scholar
  2. Barreto HJ (1994) Evaluation and utilization of different mulches and cover crops for maize production in Central America. In: Thurston HD, Smith M, Abawi G and Kearl S (eds) Tapado-Slash/mulch: How Farmers Use It and What Researchers Know About It, pp 157-168. CATIE/CIIFAD, Turrialba, Costa RicaGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkey C (1994) Maya Land Rights in Belize and the History of Indian Reservations. Indian Law Resource Center, Washington, DC, USA. 35 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. Boot RGA (1997) Extraction of non-timber forest products from tropical rain forests: Does diversity come at a price? Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 45: 439-450Google Scholar
  5. Bruntland GH (1989) Notre avenir à tous. Éditions du Fleuve. Québec, Canada. 432 ppGoogle Scholar
  6. Buckles D (1995) Velvet bean: A new plant with history. Economic Botany 46(1): 13-25Google Scholar
  7. Bunch R (1994) The potential of slash/mulch for relieving poverty and environmental degradation. In: Thurston HD, Smith M, Abawi G and Kearl S (eds) Tapado-Slash/mulch: How Farmers Use It and What Researchers Know About it, pp 5-10. CATIE/CIIFAD, Turrialba, Costa RicaGoogle Scholar
  8. Cowgill UM (1962) An agricultural study of the Southern Maya Lowlands. American Anthropologist 64: 273-286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dove MR (1983) Theories of swidden agriculture, and the political economy of ignorance. Agroforestry Systems 1: 85-99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dupriez H (1982) Paysans d'Afrique noire. Second Edition. Éditions l'Harmattan, Paris, France, pp 19-60Google Scholar
  11. FAO (1997) Situación de los bosques del mundo. Food and Alimentation Organization, Roma, Italy. 200 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Gómez-Pompa A, Vásquez-Yanes C and Guevara S (1972) The tropical rain forest: a non renewable resource. Science 177: 762-765Google Scholar
  13. Government of Belize (1996) Belize Abstracts of Statistics. Central Statistical Office, Ministry of Finance, Belmopan, BelizeGoogle Scholar
  14. Hammond N (1978) The myth of the milpa: agricultural expansion in the Maya Lowlands. In: Harrison PD and Turner BL (eds) Pre-Hispanic Maya Agriculture, pp 23-34. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USAGoogle Scholar
  15. Jouve P (1988) Quelques réflexions sur la spécificité et l'identification des systèmes agraires. Les Cahiers de la Recherche et du Développement 20: 5-16Google Scholar
  16. Kairi Consultants Limited (1996) Poverty Assessment Report-Belize. Kairi Consultants Limited, Tunapuna, Trinidad & TobagoGoogle Scholar
  17. Kalpagé FSCP (1974) Tropical Soil. Macmillan cie, India. 238 ppGoogle Scholar
  18. Lambert JDH and Arnason JT (1980) Nutrient levels in corn and competing weed species in a first year milpa, Indian Church, Belize, CA Plant and Soil 55: 415-427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lévi-Strauss C (1971) Systèmes sociaux et dynamique culturelle. In: Lengyel P (ed) Approches de la science du développement socio-économique, pp 227-256. UNESCO, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  20. Mazoyer M and Roudart L (1997) Histoire des agricultures du monde: du néolithique à la crise contemporaine. Éditions du Seuil, Paris, France. 533 ppGoogle Scholar
  21. Morley SG (1975) The Ancient Maya. Third edition. Stanford University Press, Stanford, USA. 465 ppGoogle Scholar
  22. Mossu G (1990) Le cacaoyer. Éditions Maisonneuve et Larose, Paris, France. 132 ppGoogle Scholar
  23. Nair PKR (1993) An Introduction to Agroforestry. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 499 ppGoogle Scholar
  24. Nye PH and Greenland DJ (1960) The soil under shifting cultivation. Technical Communication No. 51. Commonwealth Bureau of Soils, Harpenden, United Kingdom. 153 ppGoogle Scholar
  25. Palm CA, Swift MJ and Woormer P (1996) Soil biological dynamics in slash-and-burn agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 58: 61-74Google Scholar
  26. Raintree JB and Warner K (1986) Agroforestry pathways for the intensification of shifting cultivation. Agroforestry Systems 4: 39-54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vosti SA and Witcover J (1996) Slash-and-burn agriculture-household perspectives. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 58: 23-38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Département de phytologie, Faculté des sciences de l'agriculture et de l'alimentationUniversité LavalSainte-FoyCanada

Personalised recommendations