The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 411–419

MRI-derived left ventricular function parameters and mass in healthy young adults: Relation with gender and body size

  • J.T. Marcus
  • L.K. DeWaal
  • M.J.W. Götte
  • R.J. van der Geest
  • R.M. Heethaar
  • A.C. Van Rossum


Purpose: To obtain normal values of left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume (EDV), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO) and LV mass, in relation to gender, weight (W), length (L) and body surface area (BSA). Methods: Sixty-one healthy volunteers (32 male, 22.4 ± 2.2 years) were examined, weight was 70.9 ± 12.2 kg, length was 1.78 ± 0.09 m, BSA was 1.88 ± 0.19 m2. Segmented k-space breathhold cine MRI was used to obtain a stack of parallel short-axis images, from which LV volumes and end-diastolic mass were derived by slice summation. Four different body size indices were studied: W, L, L2 and BSA. Results: After indexing for L, L2 and BSA, the gender differences in all LV parameters are still persisting. After indexing for W, gender differences persist for EDV and EDM, but are no longer observed for SV and CO. Separate regression analyses for males and females were performed. EDV, SV, CO and EDM correlated significantly with each body size index, both in males and in females. L or BSA were in general better predictors for LV parameters than W. Linear regression equations of EDV (ml) vs. L(m) were for males: EDV = 275 × L − 359 and for females: EDV = 190 × L − 215. Equations of SV(ml) vs. L were for males: SV = 186 × L − 237 and for females: SV = 118 × L − 121. Equations of LV mass(g) vs. L were for males: Mass = 175 × L − 179 and for females: Mass = 65.8 × L − 10.9. Conclusion: Most gender differences in LV parameters remain even after correction for body size indices. Normal reference values for LV parameters are given in relation to body size indices, by calculating regression coefficients separately for males and females. These normal values serve to obtain more accurate reference values for a patient with given gender, weight and length, and thus to improve the differentiation between normal and abnormal LV parameters.

body height body weight cardiac output gender heart mass human stroke volume 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    White HD, Norris RM, Brown MA, Brandt PWT, Whitlock RML, Wild CJ. Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation 1987; 76: 44-51.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dubois D, Dubois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight are known. Arch Int Med 1916; 17: 863-871.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lauer MS, Anderson KM, Larson MG, Levy D. A new method for indexing left ventricular mass for differences in body size. Am J Cardiol 1994; 74: 487-91.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shub C, Klein AL, Zachariah PK, Bailey KR, Tajik AJ. Determination of left ventricular mass by echocardiography in a normal population: effect of age and sex in addition to body size. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 1994; 69: 205-11.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Underwood SR, Rees RSO, Savage PE, Klipstein RH, Firmin DN, Fox KM, Poole-Wilson PA, Longmore DB. Assessment of regional left ventricular function by magnetic resonance. Br Heart J 1986; 56: 334-40.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sechtem U, Pflugfelder PW, Gould RG, Cassidy MM, Higgins CB. Measurement of right and left ventricular volumes in healthy individuals with cine MR imaging. Radiology 1987; 163: 697-02.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Higgins CB, Holt W, Pflugfelder P, Sechtem U. Functional evaluation of the heart with magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Res Med 1988; 6: 121-39.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van Rossum AC, Visser FC, Sprenger M, Van Eenige MJ, Valk J, Roos JP. Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the determination of left ventricular ejection fraction and comparison with angiography. Am J Cardiol 1988; 62: 628-33.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cranney GB, Lotan CS, Dean L, Baxley W, Bouchard A, Pohost G. Left ventricular volume measurement using cardiac axis nuclear magnetic resonance imaging: validation by calibrated ventricular angiography. Circulation 1990; 82: 154-63.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mogelvange J, Lindvig K, Sondergard L, Saunamaki K, Henndriksen O. Reproducibility of cardiac volume measurements including left ventricular mass determined by MRI. Clin Physiol 1993; 13: 587-97.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sakuma H, Fujita N, Foo TKF, Caputo GR, Nelson SJ, Hartiala J, Shimakawa A, Higgins CB. Evaluation of left ventricular volume and mass with breathhold cine MR imaging. Radiology 1993; 188: 377-80.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van der Geest RJ, de Roos A, Van der Wall EE, Reiber JHC. Quantitative analysis of cardiovascular MR images. Int J Card Imag 1997; 13: 247-58.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rogers WJ, Shapiro EP, Weiss JL, Buchalter MB, Rademakers FE, Weisfeldt ML, Zerhouni EA. Quantification of and correction for left ventricular systolic long axis shortening by magnetic resonance tissue tagging and slice isolation. Circulation 1991; 84: 721-31.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marcus JT, Götte MJW, Dewaal LK, Stam MR, VanderGeest RJ, Heethaar RM, VanRossum AC. The influence of through-plane motion on left ventricular volumes measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Implications for image acquisition and analysis. J Cardiov Magn Res 1999; 1: 1-6.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nidorf SM, Picard MH, Triulzi MO, Thomas JD, Newell J, King ME, Weyman AE. New perspectives in the assessment of cardiac chamber dimensions during development and adulthood. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 983-88.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lorenz CH, Walker ES, Morgan VL, Klein SS, Graham TP. Normal human right and left ventricular mass, systolic function, and gender differences by cine magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiov Magn Res 1999; 1: 7-21.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Katz J, Whang J, Boxt LM, Barst RJ. Estimation of right ventricular mass in normal subjects and in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21: 1475-81.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Doherty NE, Fujita N, Caputo GN, Higgins CB. Measurement of right ventricular mass in normal and dilated cardiomyopathic ventricles using cine magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol 1992; 69: 1223-28.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pattynama PMT, Lamb HJ, Van der Velde EA, Van der Geest RJ, Van der Wall EA, De Roos A. Reproducibility of MRI-derived measurements of right ventricular volumes and myocardial mass. Magn Res Imag 1995; 13: 53-63.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • J.T. Marcus
    • 1
  • L.K. DeWaal
    • 1
  • M.J.W. Götte
    • 2
  • R.J. van der Geest
    • 3
  • R.M. Heethaar
    • 1
  • A.C. Van Rossum
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept of Clinical Physics and InformaticsVrije Universiteit AmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Dept of Cardiology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research ICaR-VUVrije UniversiteitAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Dept of RadiologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations