Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 44, Issue 2–3, pp 133–140

Assessing soil quality in a riparian buffer by testing organic matter fractions in central Iowa, USA

  • C. O. Marquez
  • C. A. Cambardella
  • T. M. Isenhart
  • R. C. Schultz

Abstract

A multispecies riparian buffer strip (MRB) was established along Bear Creek in central Iowa by the Agroecology Issues Team at Iowa State University (ISU) in order to assess the ability of the MRB to positively impact soil erosion and process non-point source pollutants to improve water quality. Soil organic matter (SOM), and especially biologically-active soil organic matter, is considered to be an important soil quality indicator variable because of it has relationship to critical soil functions like erodibility and the capacity of the soil to act as an environmental buffer. The objectives of this study were to examine trends in SOM C accrual and to quantify intra-seasonal changes in SOM C and particulate organic matter (POM) C for each vegetation zone of a MRBS seven years after establishment on previously cultivated or heavily grazed soil. Total SOM C and POM C in soil under perennial vegetation (poplar, switchgrass and cool season grass) were significantly higher than under cropped soil. Total POM C changed within vegetation type over the four month study period, whereas total SOM C did not. After six growing seasons, SOM C increased 8.5% under poplar grown in association with cool season grass, and 8.6% under switchgrass. The results are very promising and suggest that changes in SOM C can occur in a relatively short time after the establishment of perennial vegetation in a MRB. These changes should increase the ability of MRB soil to process non-point source pollutants.

Glicine max Panicum virgatum Populus X euramerican particular organic matter 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cambardella C and Elliott E (1992a) Particulate soil organic matter changes across a grassland cultivation sequence. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56: 777–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cambardella C and Elliott E (1992b) Methods for physical separation and characterization of soil organic matter fractions. Geoderma 56: 449–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cambardella C and Elliott E (1993) Carbon and nitrogen distribution in aggregates from cultivated and native grassland soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57: 1071–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cambardella C (1997) Experimental verification of simulated soil organic matter pools. In: Lal R et al. (eds) Soil Processes and the Carbon Cycle, pp 519–526. CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  5. Christensen B (1992) Physical fractionation of soil and organic matter in primary particle size and density separates. Adv Soil Sci 20: 2–90Google Scholar
  6. Christensen, B (1996) Carbon in primary and secondary organomineral complexes. Adv Soil Sci 24: 97–165Google Scholar
  7. Elmore W and Beschta R (1987) Riparian areas: perception in management. Rangelands 6: 260–265Google Scholar
  8. Fisher M, Rao I, Lascano J, Yhomas J, Vera R and Ayarza M (1994) Pasture soil as carbon sink. Nature 376: 473–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher M, Rao I, Lascano J, Yhomas J, Vera R and Ayarza M (1994) Carbon storage by intro-ducen deep-rooted grasses in the South American savannas. Nature 317: 236–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Janzen H, Campbell C, Brandt S, Lafond G and Townley-Smith L (1992) Light-fraction organic matter in soils from long-term crop rotations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56: 1799–1806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hill A (1996) Nitrate removal in stream riparian zones. J. Environ Qual 25: 743–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lal R (1997) Land use and soil management effects on soil organic matter dynamics on alfisol in Western Nigeria. In: Lal R et al. (eds) Soil Processes and the Carbon Cycle, pp 109–126. CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  13. Lowrance R, Todd R, Fail J, Hendrickson O, Leonardo R and Asmussen (1984) Riparian forests as nutrients filters in agricultural watersheds. Bio Sci 34: 374–377Google Scholar
  14. Osborne L and Kovacic D (1993) Riparian vegetated buffer strips in water-quality restoration and stream management. Freshwater Biology 24: 243–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Paul E (1984) Dynamic of organic matter in soils. Plant Soil 76: 275–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. SASInstitute, Inc. SAS/STAT user’s guide. Vol. 2. 6th de. SAS Inst., Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  17. Schultz R, Colletti J, Simpkins W, Wray P, Anderson L, Rule C, Mize C and Thompson M (1993) Demonstration and evaluation of a sustainable multi-species riparian buffer strip as non-point source Best Management Practice. Final Report to the Leopold Center of Sustainable Agriculture and Iowa Department of Natural Resources, 156 ppGoogle Scholar
  18. Schultz R, Colletti J, Isenhart T, Simpkins W, Mize C and Thompson M (1995) Design and placement of a multi-species riparian buffer strip system. Agroforestry Systems 29: 201–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sikora L, Yakovchenko V, Cambardella C and Doran J (1996) Assessing soil quality by testing organic matter. In: Soil Organic Matter: Analysis and Interpretation, vol 46, pp 41–50. SSSA, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  20. Sikora L and Stott D (1996) Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen. In: Doran W and Jones A (eds) Methods for Assessing Soil Quality, vol 49, pp 157–167. SSSA, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  21. Van B and Jackson W (1990) Concepts is stream riparian rehabilitation, pp 281–289. Trans. 51st N.A. Wildl & Nat Res ConfGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. O. Marquez
    • 1
  • C. A. Cambardella
    • 2
  • T. M. Isenhart
    • 1
  • R. C. Schultz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forestry, 251 Bessey HallIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  2. 2.National Soil Tilth Lab.USDA-ARSAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations