Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 44, Issue 2–3, pp 253–265 | Cite as

The establishment and early growth of three leguminous tree species for use in silvopastoral systems of the southeastern USA

  • B. J. Addlestone
  • J. P. Mueller
  • J-M. Luginbuhl


Demand for goat meat in the eastern USA is growing as a result of preference by ethnic communities. Meat goat production systems in the southeastern USA should be designed to take advantage of the goats' natural preference for browse. Trees could contribute to system productivity by supplying required nutrients when demand by growing animals is critical and the quality of forage is limited. A field study was established in Wake County, NC to evaluate the establishment and early growth characteristics of three leguminous tree species, Robinia pseudoacacia, Gleditsia triacanthos, and Albizia julibrissin. The three tree species were planted in single-row plots following a randomized complete block design (3 × 2 × 2, replicated six times) with two planting densities (intra-row spacing of 50 or 100 cm) and two coppice heights (25 or 50 cm). Bare-root seedlings were planted in March 1995, evaluated for browse quality (composited samples) in August 1995, coppiced in February 1996, evaluated for herbage mass and quality in July 1996, and evaluated for goat preference in August 1996. Herbage mass produced during the second season ranged from about 200 (G. tricanthos) to 3,200 kg/ha (R. pseudoacacia). Estimates of herbage quality were high for all species. Crude protein and acid detergent fiber of leaflets ranged from 23 to 28% and 12 to 22%, respectively. Robinia pseudoacacia has a high potential as a browse species for goats due to high herbage production (mean of 2,390 kg/ha) and goat preference. Gleditsia triacanthos was judged to be a low value browse species. Albizia julibrissin, although not highly preferred by goats in the trial holds sufficient potential to warrant further investigation.

Albizia julibrissin browse forage Gleditsia triacanthos goats Robinia pseudo-acacia 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bransby DI, Sladden SE and Aiken GE (1992) Mimosa as a Forage Plant: Preliminary Evaluation. Proc: American Forage and Grassland Council 1, Georgetown, TexGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheeke PR (1992) Black Locust as an Animal Feedstuff. Proc: International Conference on Black Locust: Biology, Culture & Utilization (June 17–21, 1991). Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheeke PR and Shrull LR (1985) Natural Toxicants in Feeds and Poisonous Plants. Avi Publishing Co., INC., Westport, CT, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Gold MA and Hanover JW (1993) Honey Locust (Gleditsia triacanthos), a multi-purpose tree for the temperate zone. The Int Tree Crops Jour 7: 189–207Google Scholar
  5. Komarek AR, Robertson JB and Van Soest PJ (1993) A comparison of methods for determining ADF using the filter bag technique versus conventional filtration. J Dairy Sci 77 (Sup 1)Google Scholar
  6. Lambert MG, Jung GA, Fletcher RH, Budding PJ and Costall DA (1989) Forage shrubs in North Island Hill Country 2, sheep and goat preferences. New Zealand Jour of Agric Res 32: 485–490Google Scholar
  7. Le Houérou HN (1978) The Role of Shrubs and Trees in the Management of Natural Grazing Lands (With Particular Reference to Protein Production). Eighth World Forestry Congress-Agenda Item 10 (October 16–28, 1978). Jakarta, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  8. McArdle AJ and Santamour Jr FS (1986) Screening Mimosa (Albizia julibrissin) seedlings for resistance to Nematodes and Fusarium Wilt. Plant Disease 70: 249–251Google Scholar
  9. Mebrahtu T (1992) Growth and Photosynthesis of Black Locust. Proc.: International Conference on Black Locust: Biology, Culture, & Utilization (June 17–21, 1991). Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  10. National Research Counci (1981) Nutrient requirements for goats: angora, dairy and meat goats in temperate and tropical countries. Nut Req of Domestic Animals 15: 13–14Google Scholar
  11. Papachristou TG and Papanastasis VP (1994) Forage value of Mediterranean deciduous woody fodder species and its implication to management of silvo-pastoral systems for goats. Agrofor Syst 27: 269–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pinkerton F, Escobar N, Harwell L and Drinkwater W (1994) A Survey of Prevalent Production and Marketing Practices in Meat Goats of Southern Origin. SRDC Publication No. 182. Southern Rural Dev. Center, Mississippi State, MSGoogle Scholar
  13. Terrill CE (1993) Goat meat in our future? The status of meat goats for the US. Live An Trade & Trans Mag 5(4): 36–39Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. J. Addlestone
    • 1
  • J. P. Mueller
    • 2
  • J-M. Luginbuhl
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of ForestryNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.Department of Crop ScienceNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  3. 3.Department of Animal ScienceNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations