Advertisement

Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 47, Issue 1–3, pp 37–48 | Cite as

Improving shifting cultivation in Southeast Asia by building on indigenous fallow management strategies

  • M. Cairns
  • D. P. Garrity
Article

Abstract

Shifting cultivation continues as the economic mainstay of upland communities in many countries in Southeast Asia. However, the conditions that historically underpinned the sustainability of rotations with long fallows have largely vanished. The imperative to evolve more permanent forms of land use has been exacerbated by rapid population growth, gazettement of remnant wildlands into protected areas, and state policies to sedentarize agriculture and discourage the use of fallows and fire. There are many compelling examples where shifting cultivators have successfully managed local resources to solve local problems. Technical approaches to stabilizing and improving productivity of shifting cultivation systems have not been notably successful. Farmer rejection of researcher-driven solutions has led to greater recognition of farmer constraints. This experience underlined the need for participatory, on-farm research approaches to identify solutions. The challenge is to document and evaluate indigenous strategies for intensification of shifting cultivation through a process of research and development. This process involves identification of promising indigenous practices, characterization of the practices, validation of the utility of the practice for other communities, extrapolation to other locations, verification with key farmers, and wide-scale extension.

farming systems indigenous knowledge intensification slash-and-burn swidden uplands 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cairns M and Burgers P (eds) (1999) Indigenous strategies for intensification of shifting cultivation in Southeast Asia. Proceedings of a regional workshop held in Bogor, Indonesia on 23–27 June 1997. International Centre for Research in Agroforestry, Southeast Asian Regional Research Programme, Bogor, Indonesia (in press)Google Scholar
  2. Conklin H (1954) An ethnoecological approach to shifting agriculture. Transactions New York Academy of Sciences, Series II 17: 133–142Google Scholar
  3. Conklin HC (1957) Hanunoo Agriculture: A Report on an Integral System of Shifting Cultivation in the Philippines. FAO Forestry Development Paper No 12, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  4. De Foresta H and Michon G (1997) The agroforest alternative to Imperata grasslands: when smallholder agriculture and forestry reach sustainability. In: Garrity DP (ed) Agroforestry Innovations for Imperata Grassland Rehabilitation, pp 105–120. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands and the International Centre for Research in Agroforestry, Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  5. ICRAF (1997) Indigenous Strategies for Intensification of Shifting Cultivation in Southeast Asia. Programme and Abstracts for a Workshop, 23–27 June 1997. International Centre for Research in Agroforestry, Bogor, Indonesia, 125 ppGoogle Scholar
  6. van Noordwijk M, Hairiah K, Guntro B, Sugito Y and Ismunandar S (1996) Biological management of soil fertility for sustainable agriculture on acid upland soils. Agrivita 19: 131–136Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ICRAF Southeast Asia Regional ProgrammeBogorIndonesia

Personalised recommendations