Advertisement

Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 44, Issue 2–3, pp 215–225 | Cite as

Evaluation of potential gross income from non-timber products in a model riparian forest for the Chesapeake Bay watershed

  • L. F. Robles-Diaz-de-LeonEmail author
  • P. Kangas
Article

Abstract

The creation of riparian forest buffer zones for water quality management in agricultural landscapes takes land out of production, incurring an economic loss for the landowner. However, planting and harvesting techniques, such as those employed in indigenous systems of tropical agroforestry, can enhance riparian forest buffer strips with economically viable species. This kind of riparian forest buffer can be harvested and generate income from otherwise unproductive tracts of land. This practice would make the implementation of riparian forest buffers more acceptable to farmers, by generating income while helping to improve water quality. The present project provides an economic model for the harvest of non-timber products (fruits, nuts and ornamentals) from riparian forest buffer zones in the Chesapeake Bay region. Potential gross income from harvest is calculated to demonstrate the feasibility of this strategy. Given certain assumptions, the gross income can amount to $60,934.30/ha/year.

energy circuit models fruit trees ideal Holdridge diagram income generation nut trees ornamentals riparian buffer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alcorn JB (1989) An economic analysis of Huastec Mayan forest management. In: Browder JO (ed) Fragile Lands of Latin America, pp 182–206. Westview Press, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcorn JB (1981) Huastec noncrop resource management: implications for prehistoric rain forest management. Human Ecology 9(4): 395–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anonymous (1993) Forest buffers raise concerns for farmers. In: Trees and the Bay, November Bay Journal. Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay, Annapolis, Maryland.Google Scholar
  4. Clay J and Clement C (1993) Selected species and strategies to enhance income generation from Amazonian forests. FAO Forestry Paper, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  5. Davies K (1994) New and old northern tree crops. PO Box 601, Northampton, MA 01061Google Scholar
  6. D’Elia CF (1995) Sustainable development and the Chesapeake Bay: a case study, pp 161–176. In: Munasinghe M and Shearer W (eds) Defining and Measuring Sustainability. The World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Forestry Work Group (1993) The role and function of forest buffers in the Chesapeake Bay Basin for nonpoint source management. Nonpoint Source Subcommittee, Chesapeake Bay Program, Annapolis, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  8. Fosberg F (1973) Temperate zone influence on tropical forest land use: a plea for sanity, pp 345–350. In: Meggers BJ, Ayensu ES and Duckworth WD (eds) Tropical Forest Ecosystems in Africa and South America: A Comparative Review. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Godoy R, Lubowski R and Markandya A (1993) A method for the economic valuation of nontimber tropical forest products. Economic Botany 47: 220–233Google Scholar
  10. Gouin F (1990) Pussy Willow as an Alternative Crop. Cooperative Extension Service, University of Maryland System, Vegetable Views 1(3): 5–7Google Scholar
  11. Holdridge LR (1967) Life zone ecology. Tropical Science Center, San Jose, Costa Rica Leach C (1983) Colonial Berries: Small Fruits Adapted to American Agriculture. The National Colonial Farm Research Report 11. The Accokeek Foundation, Accokeek, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  12. Leach C (1984) Colonial Uses of Nut Trees. The National Colonial Farm Research Report 21. The Accokeek Foundation, Accokeek, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  13. Lichtenberg E, Lessley BV and Howard HD (1991) Maryland farmers’ adoption of best management practices for nonpoint source pollution control. Cooperative Extension Service Bulletin 345. University of Maryland System, College Park, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  14. Lowrance R et al. (1995) Water Quality Functions of Riparian Forest Buffer Systems in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Nutrient Subcommittee, Chesapeake Bay Program, Annapolis, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  15. Mendelsohn R (1993) Non-timber forest products, pp 1425–1448. In: Pancel L (ed) Tropical Forestry Handbook, Vol. 2. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  16. National Research Council (NRC) (1983) Ecological aspects of development in the humid tropics. National Academy Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  17. Odum EP (1978) Ecological importance of the riparian zone, pp. 2–4. In: Johnson RR and McCormick JF (eds) Strategies for Protection and Management of Floodplain Wetlands and Other Riparian Ecosystems. General Technical Report WO-12, USDA Forest Service, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  18. Odum HT (1983) Systems Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Perfecto I, Rice RA, Greenberg R and Van der Voort ME (1996) Shade coffee: a disappearing refuge for biodiversity. Bioscience 46: 1466–1475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Peters CM, Gentry AH and Mendelsohn RO (1989) Valuation of an Amazonian rainforest. Nature 339: 655–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peterson NR (1991) Genetic Resources of Temperate Fruit and Nut Crops. Pawpaw (Asimina). Acta Horticulturae. International Society for Horticultural ScienceGoogle Scholar
  22. Pinedo-Vasquez M, Zarin D and Jipp P (1992) Economic returns from forest conversion in the Peruvian Amazon. Ecological Economics 6: 163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Plotkin M and Famolare L (eds) (1992) Sustainable Harvest and Marketing of Rain Forest Products. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  24. Pryor EB (Undated) Orchard fruits in the colonial Chesapeake. national colonial farm Research Report 14, The Accokeek Foundation, Accokeek, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  25. Pryor EB (1984) Heaven’s favourite gift: viticulture in colonial Maryland, Virginia, and Pennsylvania. National Colonial Farm Research Report 23, The Accokeek Foundation, Accokeek, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  26. Scharabok K (1994) Tree Crops and the Evolution of Forest Farming. Forest Farming and Gardening. The Permaculture Activist #31Google Scholar
  27. Stang EJ (1990) Elderberry, highbush cranberry, and juneberry management. In: Galleta G and Himelrick D (eds) Small Fruit Crop Management, pp 363–382. Pretince Hall Career & Technology, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  28. USDA (1997) Agriculture Information Bulletin # 408. Growing Fruits and NutsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marine, Estuarine and Environmental Sciences ProgramUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations