Advertisement

Natural Language & Linguistic Theory

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 541–586 | Cite as

Macedonian and Bulgarian li Questions: Beyond Syntax

  • Catherine Rudin
  • Christina Kramer
  • Loren Billings
  • Matthew Baerman
Article

Abstract

The distribution of the yes/no-interrogative clitic li in Macedonian and Bulgarian reveals a complex interaction of syntax with non-syntactic factors. The underlying syntactic uniformity of questions with li in the two languages is obscured by a series of prosodic idiosyncracies in one language or the other. In Macedonian, the major prosodic phenomenon affecting the placement of li is the option for certain sequences of words to share a single stress. In Bulgarian, two different prosodic phenomena are relevant: stressing of clitics after the negative element ne and inversion of initial clitics with the following verb. When these factors are controlled for, the syntax of li questions in the two languages is strikingly homogeneous. If no element is focused (i.e., moved to SpecCP), then, in both languages, the tensed verb head-incorporates into li in C. Additional non-syntactic factors, including lexical differences between the two languages in the clitic/non-clitic status of certain auxiliaries and differences in the usage of li questions, are also discussed.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Complex Interaction Negative Element Single Stress Lexical Difference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Alexander, Ronelle: 1991, ‘The Rhythm of Negation in Balkan Slavic’ presented at the American Association of Teachers of Slavic and Eastern Languages Conference, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, Ronelle: 1995, ‘The Balkanization of Wackernagel's Law’ Indiana Slavic Studies 7, 1–8, in G. Fowler et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Biennial Conference on Balkan and South Slavic Linguistics, Literature, and Folklore, Department of Slavic Languages, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, Stephen R.: 1996, ‘How to Put your Clitics in their Place, or Why the Best Account of Second-Position Phenomena May be Something Like the Optimal One’ The Linguistic Review 13, 165–91. (Special issue: M. Nespor (ed.), Phonology Between Words and Phrases.)Google Scholar
  4. Avgustinova, Tania: 1994, ‘On the Bulgarian Verb Clitics’ Journal of Slavic Linguistics 2, 29–47.Google Scholar
  5. Baerman, Matthew: 1998, ‘The Evolution of Prosodic Constraints inMacedonian’ Lingua 104, 57–78.Google Scholar
  6. Baerman, Matthew and Loren Billings: 1998, ‘Macedonian Clitics and the Trisyllabic Stress Window’ in M. Dimitrova-Vulchanova et al. (eds.), Papers from the Second Conference on Formal Approaches to South Slavic Linguistics (University of Trondheim Working Papers in Linguistics 31), NTNU Linguistics Department, Dragvoll, Norway, pp. 13–32.Google Scholar
  7. Billings, Loren A.: 1996, ‘Conflicting Prosodic and Syntactic Constraints on Special Clitics’ Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft Papers in Linguistics 6, pp. 43–50. (J. Kornfilt (ed.), Proceedings of the Workshop on the Phonology, Morphology and Syntax of Clitics, Berlin, 26–27 May 1996.)Google Scholar
  8. Ćavar, Damir: 1996, ‘On Cliticization in Croatian: Syntax or Prosody?’ Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft Papers in Linguistics 6, pp. 51–65. (J. Kornfilt (ed.), Proceedings of the Workshop on the Phonology, Morphology and Syntax of Clitics, Berlin, 26–27 May 1996.)Google Scholar
  9. Ćavar, Damir and Chris Wilder: 1994, ‴Clitic Third″ in Croatian’ Linguistics in Potsdam 1, 25–63.Google Scholar
  10. Comrie, Bernard: 1976, ‘Irregular Stress in Polish and Macedonian’ International Review of Slavic Linguistics 1, 227–40.Google Scholar
  11. Comrie, Bernard: 1997, ‘Formal Approaches to Slavic Languages: Achievements and Limitations’ in W. Browne et al. (eds.), Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 4, Michigan Slavic Publications, Ann Arbor, pp. 165–82.Google Scholar
  12. Dimitrova-Vulchanova, Mila: 1995, ‘Clitics in Slavic’ Studia Linguistica 49, 54–92.Google Scholar
  13. Elson, Mark J.: 1976, ‘The Definite Article in Bulgarian and Macedonian’ Slavic and East European Journal 20, 273–79.Google Scholar
  14. Elson, Mark J.: 1993, ‘Collocational Stress in Contemporary Standard Macedonian’ Slavic and East European Journal 37, 149–61.Google Scholar
  15. Embick, David and Roumyana Izvorski: 1997, ‘Participle-Auxiliary Word Orders in Slavic’ in W. Browne et al. (eds.), Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 4, Michigan Slavic Publications, Ann Arbor, pp. 210–39.Google Scholar
  16. Englund, Birgitta: 1977, Yes/No-Questions in Bulgarian and Macedonian: Form, Almqvist and Wiksell International, Stockholm (Acta Universitatis stockholmensis, Stockholm Slavic Studies, 12).Google Scholar
  17. Englund, Birgitta: 1979, ‘The Functions of Yes/No-Questions (on Basis of Bulgarian and Macedonian Material)’ in B. Englund et al. (eds.), Papers in Slavonic Linguistics 1, Stockholms universitet, Institutionen för slaviska och baltiska språk, Stockholm, pp. 16–26. (Meddelanden från institutionen för slaviska och baltiska språk, 18.)Google Scholar
  18. Franks, Steven L.: 1987, ‘Regular and Irregular Stress in Macedonian’ International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics 35–36, 93–142.Google Scholar
  19. Franks, Steven L.: 1989, ‘The Monosyllabic Head Effect’ NLLT 7, 551–63.Google Scholar
  20. Franks, Steven L.: 1991, ‘Diacritic Extrametricality vs. Diacritic Accent: A Reply to Hammond’ Phonology 8, 145–61.Google Scholar
  21. Friedman, Victor A.: 1993, ‘Macedonian’ in B. Comrie and G. C. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic Languages, Routledge, London, pp. 249–305.Google Scholar
  22. Garde, Paul: 1968, ‘Note sur l'enclise et la proclise en macédonien’ Zbornik za filologiju i lingvistiku 11, 31–37 [Novi Sad: Matica srpska].Google Scholar
  23. Groen, Bernardus M.: 1977, A Structural Description of the Macedonian Dialect of Dihovo, Peter de Ridder Press, Lisse.Google Scholar
  24. Halle, Morris and Michael Kenstowicz: 1991, ‘The Free Element Condition and Cyclic vs. Noncyclic Stress’ Linguistic Inquiry 22, 457–501.Google Scholar
  25. Halpern, Aaron L.: 1995, On the Placement and Morphology of Clitics, CSLI Publications, Stanford.Google Scholar
  26. Hammond, Michael: 1989, ‘Lexical Stress in Macedonian and Polish’ Phonology 6, 19–38.Google Scholar
  27. Hauge, Kjetil Rå: 1976, The Word Order of Predicate Clitics in Bulgarian, Universitetet i Oslo, Slavisk-Baltisk Institutt, Oslo (Meddelelser, 10).Google Scholar
  28. Hendricks, Peter: 1976, The Radožda-Vevčani Dialect of Macedonian, Peter de Ridder Press, Lisse.Google Scholar
  29. Izvorski, Roumyana: 1994, ‘Yes-No Questions in Bulgarian: Implications for Phrase Structure’ presented at the 9th Biennial Conference on Balkan and South Slavic Linguistics, Literature, and Folklore, Indiana University, Bloomington, April 1994.Google Scholar
  30. Izvorski, Roumyana: 1995, ‘Wh-Movement and Focus-Movement in Bulgarian’ in R. Eckardt and V. van Geenhoven (eds.), ConSole II: Proceedings of the Second Conference of the Student Organization of Linguistics in Europe, Holland Academic Graphics, The Hague, pp. 54–67.Google Scholar
  31. Izvorski, Roumyana, Tracy Holloway King and Catherine Rudin: 1997, ‘Against li Lowering in Bulgarian’ Lingua 102, 187–94.Google Scholar
  32. Kager, René: 1993, ‘Stress in Windows’ unpublished manuscript, Universiteit Utrecht.Google Scholar
  33. Kenstowicz, Michael: 1991, ‘Enclitic Accent: Macedonian, Italian, Polish’ in P. M. Bertinetto et al. (eds), Certamen Phonologicum II: Papers from the 1990 Cortona Phonology Meeting, Rosenberg and Sellier, Torino, pp. 173–85.Google Scholar
  34. King, Tracy Holloway: 1995, Configuring Topic and Focus in Russian, CSLI Publications, Stanford. (Chapter 6, ‘Focus in Yes-No Questions’ also appeared in 1994 as ‘Focus in Russian Yes-No Questions’ Journal of Slavic Linguistics 2, 92–120.)Google Scholar
  35. King, Tracy Holloway: 1996, ‘Slavic Clitics, Long Head Movement, and Prosodic Inversion’ Journal of Slavic Linguistics 4, 274–311.Google Scholar
  36. King, Tracy Holloway: 1997a, ‘The Prosodic Status of A/A0-Heads in Slavic’ in K. Kusumoto (ed.), Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society, Vol. 27, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, pp. 235–49.Google Scholar
  37. King, Tracy Holloway: 1997b, ‘Some Consequences of a Prosodic Inversion Account of Slavic Clitic Clusters’ in U. Junghanns and G. Zybatow (eds.), Formale Slavistik, Vervuert Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 75–86.Google Scholar
  38. Koneski, Blaže: 1952, ‘Za akcentot’ Gramatika na makedonskiot literaturen jazik. Del 1. Državno knigoizdatelstvo na NR Makedonija, Skopje, pp. 123–84. (Reprinted in 1967 as Izbrani dela vo sedum knigi, 6, Skopje, Kultura, pp. 139–210.)Google Scholar
  39. Korubin, Blagoja: 1974, ‘Mesto glagola sum kak vspomogatel'nogo i kak svjazki v makedonskom literaturnom jazyke’ in N. Ju. Švedova et al. (eds.), Grammatičeskoe opisanie slavjanskix jazykov: Koncepcii i metody, Nauka, Moskva, pp. 244–50.Google Scholar
  40. Kramer, Christina E.: 1985, Anglisko-makedonski razgovornik, Univerzitet ‘Kiril i Metodij’ Skopje.Google Scholar
  41. Kramer, Christina E.: 1986, Analytic Modality in Macedonian, Verlag Otto Sagner, München (Slavistische Beiträge 198).Google Scholar
  42. Kramer, Christina E.: 1993, ‘The Future in Macedonian’ presented at the American Association of Teachers of Slavic and East European Languages Conference, Toronto, 27–30 December 1993.Google Scholar
  43. Legendre, Géraldine: 1998, ‘Morphological and Prosodic Alignment of Bulgarian Clitics’ to appear in J. Dekkers, F. van der Leeuw and J. van deWeijer (eds.), Optimality Theory: Syntax, Phonology and Acquisition, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Lunt, Horace G.: 1952, A Grammar of the Macedonian Literary Language, Državno Knigoizdatelstvo na NR Makedonija, Skopje.Google Scholar
  45. Mihaljević, Milan: 1997, ‘The Interaction of li and Negation in Croatian Church Slavonic’ in U. Junghanns and G. Zybatow (eds.), Formale Slavistik, Vervuert Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 87–92.Google Scholar
  46. Minova-\(\mathop G\limits^\prime \)urkova, Liljana: 1987, ‘Partikulata li vo makedonskiot literaturen jazik’ Godišnik. Filološki fakultet na Univerzitetot – Skopje, 29–38.Google Scholar
  47. Minova-\(\mathop G\limits^\prime \)urkova, Liljana: 1994, Sintaksa na makedonskiot standarden jazik, Rading, Skopje.Google Scholar
  48. Nikov, Mišel D.: 1976, ‘Leksiko-sintaktična struktura na sâštinskite obšti vâprosi vâv frenski i bâlgarski ezik’ Bjuletin za sâpostavitelno izsledvane na bâlgarskija ezik s drugi ezici 3, 115–34.Google Scholar
  49. Norman, B. Ju.: 1971, ‘Funkcii elementa si v glagol'nyx konstrukcijax bolgarskogo jazyka’ in A. Ja. Suprun et al. (eds.), Linhvistvčcnyja dasledavanni. Sbornik artyklaw, Vydavectva BDU imja Ul. I. Lenina, Minsk, pp. 179–93.Google Scholar
  50. Penčev, Jordan: 1993, Bâlgarski sintaksis: Upravlenie i svârzvane, Plovdivsko universitetsko izdatelstvo, Plovdiv.Google Scholar
  51. Peperkamp, Sharon: 1996, ‘On the Prosodic Representation of Clitics’ in U. Kleinhenz (ed.), Interfaces in Phonology, (Studia grammatica, 41), Academie Verlag, Berlin, pp. 102–27.Google Scholar
  52. Restan, Per: 1972, Sintaksis voprositel'nogo predloženija; obščij vopros (Glavnym obrazom na materiale sovremennogo russkogo jazyka) [Syntax of the interrogative sentence; yes-no questions (Mainly on the basis of Russian material)], Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.Google Scholar
  53. Rivero, María-Luisa: 1993, ‘Bulgarian and Serbo-Croatian Yes-No Questions: V0 Raising to-li vs.-li Hopping’ Linguistic Inquiry 24, 564–75.Google Scholar
  54. Rivero, María-Luisa: 1994, ‘Clause Structure and V-Movement in the Languages of the Balkans’ NLLT 12, 63–120.Google Scholar
  55. Rudin, Catherine: 1993, ‘On Focus Position and Focus Marking in Bulgarian Questions’ in A. Davison et al. (eds.), Papers from the 4th Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Midamerica, University of Iowa, Iowa City, pp. 252–65.Google Scholar
  56. Rudin, Catherine: 1997a, ‘Kakvo li e li: Interrogation and Focusing in Bulgarian’ Balkanistika 10, 335–46.Google Scholar
  57. Rudin, Catherine: 1997b, ‘Agr-O and Bulgarian Pronominal Clitics’ in M. Lindseth and S. Franks (eds.), Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 5, Michigan Slavic Publications, Ann Arbor, pp. 224–52.Google Scholar
  58. Rudin, Catherine, Tracy Holloway King, and Roumyana Izvorski: 1997, ‘Focus in Bulgarian and Russian Yes-No Questions’ in E. Benedicto, M. Romero and S. Tomioka (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Focus, University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 21, 209–26, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  59. Sawicka, Irena and Ljudmil Spasov: 1997, Fonologija na sovremeniot makedonski standarden jazik, Detska radost, Skopje.Google Scholar
  60. Scatton, Ernest: 1984, A Reference Grammar of Modern Bulgarian, Slavica, Columbus.Google Scholar
  61. [SSKG]: 1975, Slovar slovenskega knjižnega jezika, v. 2, Slovenska akademija znanosti in umetnosti, Institut za slovenski jezik, Ljubljana.Google Scholar
  62. Toman, Jindřrich: 1996, ‘A Note on Clitics and Prosody’ in A. L. Halpern and A. M. Zwicky (eds.), Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomena, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 505–10.Google Scholar
  63. Tomić, Olga Mišeska: 1996a, ‘The Balkan Slavic Nominal Clitics’ in A. L. Halpern and A. M. Zwicky (eds.), Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomena, CSLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 511–35.Google Scholar
  64. Tomić, Olga Mišeska: 1996b, ‘The Balkan Slavic Clausal Clitics’ NLLT 14, 811–72.Google Scholar
  65. Wilder, Chris and Damir Ćavar: 1994, ‘Long Head Movement? Verb Movement in Cliticization in Croatian’ Lingua 93, 1–58.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine Rudin
    • 1
  • Christina Kramer
    • 2
  • Loren Billings
    • 3
  • Matthew Baerman
    • 4
  1. 1.Humanities DivisionWayne State CollegeWayneUSA
  2. 2.Department of Slavic Languages and LiteratureUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Department of LinguisticsUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA
  4. 4.Linguistic and International StudiesUniversity of SurreyGuildford, SurreyUK

Personalised recommendations