Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 44, Issue 2–3, pp 163–174 | Cite as

Fine root dynamics, coarse root biomass, root distribution, and soil respiration in a multispecies riparian buffer in Central Iowa, USA

  • A. Tufekcioglu
  • J. W. Raich
  • T. M. Isenhart
  • R. C. Schultz


By influencing belowground processes, streamside vegetation affects soil processes important to surface water quality. We conducted this study to compare root distributions and dynamics, and total soil respiration among six sites comprising an agricultural buffer system: poplar (Populus × euroamericana‘ Eugenei), switchgrass, cool-season pasture grasses, corn (Zea mays L.), and soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). The dynamics of fine (0--2 mm) and small roots (2--5 mm) were assessed by sequentially collecting 35 cm deep, 5.4 cm diameter cores from April through November. Coarse roots were described by excavating 1 × 1 × 2 m pits and collecting all roots in 20 cm depth increments. Root distributions within the soil profile were determined by counting roots that intersected the walls of the excavated pits. Soil respiration was measured monthly from July to October using the soda-lime technique. Over the sampling period, live fine-root biomass in the top 35 cm of soil averaged over 6 Mg ha-1 for the cool-season grass, poplar, and switchgrass sites while root biomass in the crop fields was < 2.3 Mg ha-1 at its maximum. Roots of trees, cool-season grasses, and switchgrass extended to more than 1.5 m in depth, with switchgrass roots being more widely distributed in deeper horizons. Root density was significantly greater under switchgrass and cool-season grasses than under corn or soybean. Soil respiration rates, which ranged from 1.4--7.2 g C m-2 day-1, were up to twice as high under the poplar, switchgrass and cool-season grasses as in the cropped fields. Abundant fine roots, deep rooting depths, and high soil respiration rates in the multispecies riparian buffer zones suggest that these buffer systems added more organic matter to the soil profile, and therefore provided better conditions for nutrient sequestration within the riparian buffers.

belowground biomass carbon dioxide cool-season grass corn poplar soybean switchgrass 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson JM and Ingram JSI (eds) (1993) Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility: A Handbook of Methods. C.A.B. International, UKGoogle Scholar
  2. Buyanovsky GA, Kucera CL and Wagner GH (1987) Comparative analyses of carbon dynamics in native and cultivated ecosystems. Ecology 68(6): 2023–2031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DeWitt TA (1984) Soil Survey of Story County, Iowa. USDA Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Dwyer LM, Ma BL, Stewart DW, Hayhoe HN, Balchin D, Culley JLB and McGovern M (1996) Root mass distribution under conventional and conservation tillage. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 76: 23–28Google Scholar
  5. Edwards NT (1982) The use of soda-lime for measuring respiration rates in terrestrial systems. Pedobiologia 23: 321–330Google Scholar
  6. Farrish KW (1991) Spatial and temporal fine root distribution in three Louisiana forest soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 55: 1752–1757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fawcett RS, Tierney DP, Peter CJ, Wilmington DE, Baker JL, Mickelson SK, Hatfield JL, Hoffman DW and Franti TG (1995) Protecting Aquatic Ecosystems with Vegetative Filter Strips and Conservation Tillage. National Agricultural Ecosystem Management Conference, December 13–15, 1995, New Orleans, Louisiana, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Groffman PM, Gold AJ and Simmons RC (1992) Nitrate dynamics in riparian forest: microbial studies. Journal of Environmental Quality 21: 666–671Google Scholar
  9. Grogan P (1998) CO2 flux measurement using soda-lime: correction for water formed during CO2 adsorption. Ecology 79: 1467–1468Google Scholar
  10. Hansson AC and Andren O (1986) Belowground plant production in a perennial grass ley (Festuca pratensis Huds.) assessed with different methods. Journal of Applied Ecology 23: 657–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harris WF, Kinerson RS Jr. and Edwards NT (1977) Comparison of belowground biomass of natural deciduous forest and Loblolly pine plantations. In: Marshall JK (ed), The Belowground Ecosysytem: A Synthesis of Plant-Associated Processes, pp 27–29. Range Science Department Science Series No: 26, Fort Collins, Colorado, USAGoogle Scholar
  12. Hartnett DC (1989) Density-and growth stage-dependent responses to defoliation in two rhizomatous grasses. Oecologia 80: 414–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hayes DC and Seastedt TR (1987) Root dynamics of tallgrass prairie in wet and dry years. Canadian Journal of Botany 65: 787–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heilman, PE, Ekuan G and Fogle D (1994) Above-and belowground biomass and fine roots of four-year-old hybrids of Populus trichocarpa??Populus deltoidesand parental species in short-rotation culture. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 24: 1186–1192Google Scholar
  15. Hendrick RL and Pregitzer KS (1993) The dynamics of fine root length, biomass, and nitrogen content in two northern hardwood ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23: 2507–2520Google Scholar
  16. Hill AR (1996) Nitrate removal in stream riparian zones. Journal Environmental Quality 25: 743–755Google Scholar
  17. Jose JJ, Berrade F and Ramirez J (1982) Seasonal changes of growth, mortality and disappearance of belowground root biomass in the Trachypogonsavanna grass. Acta Oecologica 3(17): 347–358Google Scholar
  18. Joslin JD and Henderson GS (1987) Organic matter and nutrients associated with fine root turnover in a white oak stand. Forest Science 33: 330–346Google Scholar
  19. Keyes MR and Grier CC (1981) Above-and belowground net production in 40-year-old Douglas fir stands on low and high productivity sites. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 11: 599–605Google Scholar
  20. Lee K-H, Isenhart TM, Schultz RC and Mickelson SK (1999) Nutrient and sediment removal by switchgrass and cool-season grass filter strips in Central Iowa, USA. Agroforestry Journal, in this issueGoogle Scholar
  21. Linscott DL, Fox RL and Lipps RC (1962) Corn root distribution and moisture extraction in relation to nitrogen fertilization and soil properties. Agronomy Journal 54: 185–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marquez CO, Cambardella CA, Isenhart TM and Schultz RC (in this issue) Assessing soil quality in a riparian buffer strip system by testing organic matter fractions. Agroforestry SystemsGoogle Scholar
  23. Moya EG and Castro PM (1992) Saline grassland near Mexico City in Primary productivity of grass ecosystems of the tropics and sub-tropics, edited by Long SP, Jones MB and Roberts MJ, published by Chapman and Hall, 2–6 Boundary Row, London SE1 8HWGoogle Scholar
  24. Nay, SM, Mattson KG and Bormann BT (1994) Biases of chamber methods for measuring soil CO2 efflux demonstrated with a laboratory apparatus. Ecology 75: 2460–2463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. O’Neill GJ and Gordon AM (1994) The nitrogen filtering capability of Carolina poplar in an artificial riparian zone. Journal Environmental Quality 23: 1218–1223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Puri S, Singh V, Bhushan B and Singh S (1994) Biomass production and distribution of roots in three stands of Populus deltoides. Forest Ecology and Management 65: 135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. SAS Institute, Inc.(1985) SAS Users Guide: Statistics. Version 5 edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
  28. Saterson KA and Vitousek PM (1984) Fine-root biomass and nutrient cycling in Aristida strictain a North Carolina coastal plain savanna. Canadian Journal of Botany 62: 823–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shackleton CM, McKenzie B and Granger JE (1988) Seasonal changes in root biomass, root/shoot ratios and turnover in two coastal grassland communities in Transkei. S Afr J Bot 54(5): 465–471Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Tufekcioglu
    • 1
  • J. W. Raich
    • 2
  • T. M. Isenhart
    • 1
  • R. C. Schultz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forestry, 253 Bessey HallIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Botany, 353 Bessey HallIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations