Journal of Consumer Policy

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 461–478 | Cite as

Information, Incentives, and Proenvironmental Consumer Behavior

  • Paul C. Stern


The article discusses the factors influencing proenvironmental consumer behaviors and the policy implications of knowledge about these influences. It presents a conceptual framework that emphasizes the determining roles of both personal and contextual factors and especially of their interactions. The practical usefulness of the framework is illustrated by evidence of the interactive effects of information and material incentives – typical interventions in the personal and contextual domains, respectively. The author concludes that incentives and information have different functions, so that efforts focused on only one are sometimes misplaced; however, properly deployed, they can have synergistic effects on behavior. Some policy conclusions are drawn for consumer and environmental policy.


Interactive Effect Synergistic Effect Conceptual Framework Economic Policy Contextual Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In: J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior, pp. 11-39. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, L. J. (1978). The joint effect of feedback and goal-setting on performance: A field study of residential energy conservation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 428-433.Google Scholar
  3. Black, J. S. (1978). Attitudinal, normative, and economic factors in early response to an energy-use field experiment. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Dissertation Abstracts International, 39, 436B.Google Scholar
  4. Black, J. S., Stern, P. C., & Elworth, J. T. (1985). Personal and contextual influences on household energy adaptations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 3-21.Google Scholar
  5. Cialdini, R., Kallgren, C., & Reno, R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and re-evaluation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 201-234.Google Scholar
  6. Craig, C. S., & McCann, J. M. (1978). Assessing communication effects on energy consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 5, 82-88.Google Scholar
  7. Derksen, L., & Gartrell, J. (1993). The social context of recycling. American Sociological Review, 58, 434-442.Google Scholar
  8. Dietz, T., & Stern, P. C. (1995). Toward a theory of choice: Socially embedded preference construction. Journal of Socio-Economics, 24, 261-279.Google Scholar
  9. Ester, P., & Winett, R. A. (1982). Toward more effective antecedent strategies for environmental programs. Journal of Environmental Systems, 11, 201-221.Google Scholar
  10. Fishbein, M. (1979). A theory of reasoned action: Some applications and implications. In: M. M. Page (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1979, pp. 65-116. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  11. Frey, B., & Oberholzer-Gee, F. (1996). The cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. American Economic Review, 87, 746-755.Google Scholar
  12. Gardner, G. T., & Stern, P. C. (1996). Environmental problems and human behavior. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  13. Guagnano, G. A., Dietz, T., & Stern, P. C. (1994). Willingness to pay for public goods: A test of the contribution model. Psychological Science, 5, 411-415.Google Scholar
  14. Guagnano, G. A., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995). Influences on attitude-behavior relationships: A natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 27, 699-718.Google Scholar
  15. Heberlein, T. A., & Baumgartner, R. M. (1985). Changing attitudes and electricity consumption in a time-of-use experiment. Paper presented at M.E.C.2 La Maîtrise de l'Energie et les Consommateurs (Consumer Behaviour and Energy Policy, Second International Conference), Versailles, April.Google Scholar
  16. Heberlein, T. A., & Warriner, G. K. (1983). The influence of price and attitude on shifting residential electricity consumption from on-to off-peak periods. Journal of Economic Psychology, 4, 107-130.Google Scholar
  17. Hirst, E., Berry, L., & Soderstrom, J. (1981). Review of utility home energy audit programs. Energy, 6, 621-630.Google Scholar
  18. Karp, D. G. (1996). Values and their effects on pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 28, 111-133.Google Scholar
  19. Kempton, W., Harris, C. K., Keith, J. G., & Weihl, J. S. (1984). Do consumers know what works in energy conservation? In: J. Harris & C. Blumstein (Eds.), What works: Documenting energy conservation in buildings, pp. 429-438. Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.Google Scholar
  20. McDougall, G. H. G., Claxton, J. D., & Ritchie, J. R. B. (1983). Residential home audits: An empirical analysis of the ENER$AVE program. Journal of Environmental Systems, 12, 265-278.Google Scholar
  21. Miller, R. D., & Ford, J. M. (1985). Shared savings in the residential market: A public/private partnership for energy conservation. Baltimore, MD: Energy Task Force, Urban Consortium for Technology Initiatives.Google Scholar
  22. Pardini, A. U., & Katzev, R. D. (1984). The effect of strength of commitment on newspaper recycling. Journal of Environmental Systems, 13, 245-254.Google Scholar
  23. Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 221-279.Google Scholar
  24. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65.Google Scholar
  25. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-46.Google Scholar
  26. Seligman, C., Becker, L. J., &. Darley, J. M. (1981). Encouraging residential energy conservation through feedback. In: A. Baum & J. Singer (Eds.), Advances in environmental psychology, Vol. 3, Energy psychological perspectives, pp. 93-113. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Stern, P. C. (1986). Blind spots in policy analysis: What economics doesn't say about energy use. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 5, 200-227.Google Scholar
  28. Stern, P. C. (1992a). Psychological dimensions of global environmental change. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 269-302.Google Scholar
  29. Stern, P. C. (1992b). What psychology knows about energy conservation. American Psychologist, 47, 1224-1232.Google Scholar
  30. Stern, P. C., Aronson, E., Darley, J. M., Hill, D. H., Hirst, E., Kempton, W., & Wilbanks, T. J. (1986). The effectiveness of incentives for residential energy conservation. Evaluation Review, 10, 147-176.Google Scholar
  31. Stern, P. C., Dietz., T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (in press). A valuebelief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review.Google Scholar
  32. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25, 322-348.Google Scholar
  33. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Kalof, L., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). Values, beliefs, and proenvironmental action: Attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1611-1636.Google Scholar
  34. Stern, P. C., & Gardner, G. T. (1981). Psychological research and energy policy. American Psychologist, 36, 329-342.Google Scholar
  35. Stern, P. C., & Oskamp, S. (1987). Managing scarce environmental resources. In: D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology, Vol. 2, 1043-1088. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1978). Moral norms and environmental behavior: An application of Schwartz's norm-activation model to yard burning. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 175-188.Google Scholar
  37. Widegren, Ö. (1998). The new environmental paradigm and personal norms. Environment and Behavior, 30, 75-100.Google Scholar
  38. Winett, R. A., Hatcher, J. A., Fort, T. R., Leckliter, I. N., Love, S. Q., Riley, A. W., & Fishback, J. F. (1982). The effects of videotape modeling and daily feedback on residential electricity conservation, home temperature and humidity, perceived comfort, and clothing worn: Winter and summer. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 155-181.Google Scholar
  39. Winett, R. A., Leckliter, I. N., Chinn, D., Stahl, B., & Love, S. (1985). Effects of television modeling on residential energy conservation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 33-44.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul C. Stern
    • 1
  1. 1.Washington, DCU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations