Experimental & Applied Acarology

, Volume 23, Issue 6, pp 437–454 | Cite as

Origin and Evolution of Feather Mites (Astigmata)



Feather mites are highly specialized plumage and skin ectoparasites that are variously adapted for inhabiting certain microhabitats on a bird's body. Different feather mite taxa of higher (familial) rank adapted to the same microhabitats display similar main morphological adaptations even if they are rather distantly related to one another. Hypotheses on the evolution of general adaptations in morphology of feather mites during colonization and establishment in different microhabitats are presented. According to recent data, feather mites are a paraphyletic group consisting of three superfamilies: Analgoidea, Pterolichoidea and Freyanoidea. We present our view on the general feather mite phylogeny course at the familial rank for the Analgoidea by means of cladistic analysis. Co-speciation of parasites with their hosts is postulated as a main factor driving feather mite evolution. Examples are given of non-coevolutionary events, for example recolonization from one host species onto another, extinction and multiple speciation.

feather mites morphological adaptations phylogeny coevolution co-speciation birds ectoparasites 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atyeo, W.T. and Gaud, J. 1979. Feather mites and their hosts. Rec. Adv. Acar. 2: 355–361.Google Scholar
  2. Atyeo, W.T., Kethley, J.B. and Pérez, T.M. 1984. Paedomorphosis in Metacheyletia (Acari: Cheyletidae), with the description of a new species. J. Med. Entomol. 21(2): 125–132.Google Scholar
  3. Černý, V. 1971. Parasite-host relationships in feather mites. In: Proceedings of the Third International Congress on Acarology, Daniel, M. and Rosický, B. (eds.), pp. 761–764. Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Prague.Google Scholar
  4. Cracraft, J. 1981. Toward a phylogenetic classification on the recent birds of the world (Class Aves). Auk 98(4): 681–714.Google Scholar
  5. Dabert, J. and Ehrnsberger, R. 1995. Zur Systematik und Phylogenie der Gattung Thecarthra Trouessart, 1896 (Astigmata, Pterolichoidea, Syringobiidae) mit Beschreibung zweier neuer Arten. Mitt. hamb. zool. Mus. Inst. 92: 87–116.Google Scholar
  6. Dabert, J. and Ehrnsberger, R., 1998. Phylogeny of the feather mite family Ptiloxenidae Gaud, 1982 (Acari: Pterolichoidea). In: Arthropod Biology: Contribution to morphology, ecology and systematics, Ebermann, E. (ed.), pp. 145–178. Biosystematics and Ecology series 14. Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna.Google Scholar
  7. Dubinin, V.B. 1951. Feather mites (Analgesoidea). Part I. Introduction to their study. Fauna SSSR, Paukoobraznye, 6(5): 1–363. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
  8. Dubinin, V.B. 1953. Feather mites (Analgesoidea). II Families Epidermoptidae and Freyanidae. Fauna SSSR. Paukoobraznye. 6(6): 3–411. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
  9. Dubinin, V.B. 1956. Feather mites (Analgesoidea). III Family Pterolichidae. Fauna SSSR. Paukoobraznye. 6(7): 3–814. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
  10. Gaud, J. and Atyeo, W.T. 1975. Ovacaridae, une famille nouvelle de sarcoptiformes plumicoles. Acarologia 17: 169–176.Google Scholar
  11. Gaud, J. and Atyeo, W.T. 1976. Discordances entre les aires de répartition géographique des parasites et celles de leurs hôtes chez les sarcoptiformes plumicoles. Acarologia 18: 329–344.Google Scholar
  12. Gaud, J. and Atyeo, W.T. 1977. Nouvelles superfamilles pour les acariens astigmates parasite d'oiseaux. Acarologia 19: 678–685.Google Scholar
  13. Gaud, J. and Atyeo, W.T. 1979. Co-évolution des acariens sarcoptiformes plumicoles et de leurs hôtes. Acarologia, 21: 291–306.Google Scholar
  14. Gaud, J. and Atyeo, W.T. 1982. Spécifité parasitaire chez les acariens Sarcoptiformes plumicoles. Mem. Mus. Nat. Hist. Natur. A-123, 21: 247–254.Google Scholar
  15. Gaud, J. and Atyeo, W.T. 1996. Feather mites of the world (Acarina, Astigmata): The supraspecific taxa. Part I Text. Ann. Mus. R. Afr. Centr., Tervuren, Sces zool. 277: 3–193.Google Scholar
  16. Hudson, G.E., Hoff, K.M., Berge, J. van den and Trivette, E.C. 1969. A numerical study of the wing and leg muscles of lari and Alcae. Ibis 111: 459–524.Google Scholar
  17. Kuroda, N. 1954. On the Classification and Phylogeny of the Order Tubinares, Particularly the Shearwaters (Puffinus) with Special Consideration on their Osteology and Habit Differentiation. Herald Co. Ltd., Tokyo.Google Scholar
  18. Lindholm, A.K., Venter, G.J. and Ueckermann, E.A. 1998. Persistence of passerine ectoparasites on the diederik cuckoo Chrysococcyx caprius. J. Zool., Lond. 244: 145–153.Google Scholar
  19. McKitrick, M.C. 1991. Phylogenetic analysis of avian hindlimb musculature. Misc. Publs. Mus. Zool., Univ. Mich. 179: 1–85.Google Scholar
  20. Mironov, S.V. 1982. Distribution of feather mites on the recent birds. Parazitologiia 14: 404–411. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
  21. Mironov, S.V. 1987. Morphological adaptations of feather mites to different types of plumage and skin of birds. Parazit. Sb. 34: 114–132. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
  22. Mironov, S.V. 1991a. A phylogeny of the feather mites family Avenzoariidae (Acariformes: Analgoidea). Parazitologiia 25(4): 281–296. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
  23. Mironov, S.V. 1991b. Coevolutionary relationships of the feather mite family Avenzoaridae (Acariformes: Analgoidea) with birds. Parazitologiia 25(6): 473–493. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
  24. Moss, W.W., Peterson, P.C. and Atyeo, W.T. 1977. A multivariate assessment of phenetic relationships within the feather mite family Eustathiidae (Acari).Syst. Zool. 26: 386–409.Google Scholar
  25. OConnor, B.M. 1982. Acari: Astigmata. In: Synopsis and Classification of Living Organisms, Parker S.P. (ed.), pp. 146–169. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Peterson, P.C. 1975. An analysis of host-parasite associations among feather mites (Acari: Analgoidea). Misc. Publs ent. Soc. Am. 9: 237–242.Google Scholar
  27. Sibley, C.G. and Ahlquist, J.E. 1990. Phylogeny and Classification of Birds. A study in molecular evolution. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Animal MorphologyA. Mickiewicz UniversityPoznanPoland. E-mail
  2. 2.Zoological InstituteRussian Academy of ScienceSaint-PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations