Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 60, Issue 2, pp 121–144 | Cite as

The Vegetation of Wet Meadows in Relation to Their Land-use

  • Susan M. Galatowitsch
  • Diane C. Whited
  • Richard Lehtinen
  • Jason Husveth
  • Karen Schik

Abstract

Wetland biomonitoring approaches are needed to determine when changes in response to stressors are occurring and to predict the consequences of proposed land-use changes. These approaches require an understanding of shifts in biota that occur in response to land-use, data that are lacking for most kinds of wetlands. Changes in floristic composition corresponding to land-use differences at multiple scales (site to 2500 m radius) were characterized for 40 wet meadows associated with prairie glacial marshes in Minnesota (U.S.A.). In general, guild was more useful than species composition for indicating land-use impacts. Site impacts (stormwater, cultivation) and landscape disturbance (agriculture and urbanization, combined), coincide with a reduction in native graminoid and herbaceous perennial abundance (e.g., Carex lasiocarpa, Calamagrostis canadensis, Spartina pectinata). This vegetation is replaced with annuals (e.g, Bidens cernua, Polygonum pensylvanicum) in recently cultivated sites or introduced perennials (e.g., Phalaris arundinacea, Typha angustifolia) and floating aquatics (lemnids) in stormwater impacted wetlands. Ditches also reduce native perennial importance and increase perennials, but only when they are in highly impacted landscapes.

impact assessment land-use impacts Minnesota wet meadows wetland vegetation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adamus, P. R.: 1992, ‘Choices in Monitoring Wetlands', in: D. H. McKenzie, D. E. Hyatt and V. J. McDonald (eds), Ecological Indicators, Elsevier Applied Science, New York, pp. 571–592.Google Scholar
  2. Ambuel, B. and Temple, S. A.: 1983, ‘Area-dependent changes in bird communities and vegetation of southern Wisconsin forests', Ecology 64, 1057–1068.Google Scholar
  3. Blair, R. B. and Launer, A. E.: 1997, ‘Butterfly diversity and human land-use: species assemblages along an urban gradient', Biological Conservation 80, 113–125.Google Scholar
  4. Bogler, D. T., Scott, T. A. and Rotenberry, T. R.: 1997, ‘Breeding bird abundance in an urbanizing landscape in coastal southern California', Conservation Biology 11, 406–421.Google Scholar
  5. Conchou, O. and Fustec, E.: 1988, ‘Influence of hydrological fluctuations on the growth and nutrient dynamics of Phalaris arundinacea L. in a riparian environment', Plant and Soil 112, 53–60.Google Scholar
  6. Conchou, O. and Pautou, G.: 1987, ‘Modes of colonization of an heterogeneous alluvial area on the edge of the Garonne River by Phalaris arundinacea', Regulated Rivers 1, 37–48.Google Scholar
  7. Connell, J. H.: 1978, ‘Diversity in tropical rainforests and coral reefs', Science 199, 1302–1310.Google Scholar
  8. Delphey, P. J. and Dinsmore, J. J.: 1993, ‘Breeding bird communities of recently restored and natural prairie potholes', Wetlands 13, 200–206.Google Scholar
  9. Denny, P.: 1994, ‘Biodiversity and wetlands', Wetlands Ecology and Management 3, 55–61.Google Scholar
  10. Ehrenfeld, J. G. and Schneider, J. P.: 1993, ‘Responses of forested wetland vegetation to perturbations of water chemistry and hydrology', Wetlands 13, 122–129.Google Scholar
  11. Ehrenfeld, J. G. and Schneider, J. P.: 1991, ‘Chamaecyparis thyoides wetlands and suburbanization: effects of nonpoint source water pollution on hydrology and plant community structure', Journal of Applied Ecology 28, 467–490.Google Scholar
  12. Findlay, C. S. and Houlahan, J.: 1997, ‘Anthropogenic correlates of species richness in southeastern Ontario wetlands', Conservation Biology 11, 1000–1009.Google Scholar
  13. Fisher, A. S., Podniesinski, G. S. and Leopold, D. J.: 1996, ‘Effects of drainage ditches on vegetation patterns in abandoned agricultural peatlands in central New York', Wetlands 16, 397–409.Google Scholar
  14. Freemark, K. E. and Merriam, H. G.: 1986, ‘Importance of area and habitat heterogenity to bird assemblages in temperate forest fragments', Biological Conservation 36, 115–141.Google Scholar
  15. Galatowitsch, S. M. and Van der Valk, A. G.: 1994, Restoring Prairie Wetlands: An Ecological Approach, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, 244 p.Google Scholar
  16. Galatowitsch, S.M. and Van der Valk, A. G.: 1995, ‘Natural revegetation during restoration of wetlands in the southern prairie pothole region of north America', in B. D. Wheeler, S. C. Shaw, W. J. Fojt and R. A. Robertson (eds.), Restoration of Temperate Wetlands John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, U.K., pp. 129–142.Google Scholar
  17. Galatowitsch, S. M. and Van der Valk, A. G.: 1996, ‘The vegetation of restored and natural prairie wetlands', Ecological Applications 6, 102–112.Google Scholar
  18. Galatowitsch, S. M., Tester, J., Whited, D. C. and Moe, S.: 1997, ‘Assessing wetland quality with ecological indicators', report to the legislative commission on Minnesota resources. (www.hort.agri.umn.edu/mnwet/).Google Scholar
  19. alatowitsch, S. M., Anderson, N. O. and Ascher, P. D.: 1998, ‘Invasiveness in wetland plants of temperate north America', Wetlands (in press).Google Scholar
  20. Grootjans, A. and Van Diggelen, R.: 1995, ‘Assessing the restoration prospects of degraded fens', in: B. D. Wheeler, S. C. Shaw, W. J. Fojt and R. A. Robertson (eds), Restoration of Temperate Wetland, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, U.K., pp. 73–89.Google Scholar
  21. Great Plains Flora Association: 1986, Flora of the Great Plains, University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
  22. Hansen, A. J. and Urban, D. L.: 1992, ‘Avian response to landscape pattern: the role of species' Life Histories', Landscape Ecology 7, 163–180.Google Scholar
  23. Hecnar, S. J. and M'Closkey, R. T.: 1997, ‘The effects of predatory fish on amphibian species richness and distribution', Biological Conservation 79, 123–131.Google Scholar
  24. Karr, J. R.: 1991, ‘Biological integrity: a long-neglected aspect of water resources management', Ecological Applications 1, 66–84.Google Scholar
  25. Kremen, C.: 1992, ‘Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural areas monitoring', Ecological Applications 2, 203–217.Google Scholar
  26. Legendre, L. and Legendre, P.: 1983, Numerical Ecology, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 419 p.Google Scholar
  27. Lehtinen, R., Galatowitsch, S. M. and Tester, J. R.: ‘The role of local and landscape factors in structuring amphibian assemblages in depressional wetlands', Wetlands (in press).Google Scholar
  28. Manley, B. F. J.: 1991, Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, Chapman and Hall, London, U.K., 281 p.Google Scholar
  29. McIntyre, S., Lavorel, S. and Tremont, R. M.: 1995, ‘Plant life-history attributes: their relationship to disturbance response in herbaceous vegetation', Journal of Ecology 83, 31–44.Google Scholar
  30. Mensing, D., Galatowitsch, S. M. and Tester, J. R.: 1998, ‘Anthropogenic impacts to small stream riparian wetlands in a northern temperate landscape', Journal of Environmental Management 53, 349–377.Google Scholar
  31. MN DNR (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources): 1996, Ecological Classification System (ECS) for Minnesota, State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Forestry, Resource Assessment Program, Grand Rapids, Minnesota. Map.Google Scholar
  32. Mueller-Dombois, D. and Ellenberg, H.: 1974, Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology, JohnWiley, New York, New York, 547 p.Google Scholar
  33. Murtaugh, P. A.: 1996, ‘The statistical evaluation of ecological indicators', Ecological Applications 6, 132–139.Google Scholar
  34. Noss, R. F.: 1990, ‘Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach', Conservation Biology 4, 355–364.Google Scholar
  35. Omernik, J. M. and Bailey, R. G.: 1997, ‘Distinguishing between watersheds and ecoregions’ Journal of the American Water Resources Association 33, 935–949.Google Scholar
  36. Ostrem, L.: 1987, ‘Studies on genetic variation in reed canarygrass, Phalaris arundinacea. II. Alkaloid type and concentration', Hereditas 107, 235–248.Google Scholar
  37. Patil, G. P.: 1991, ‘Encountered data, statistical ecology, environmental statistics, and weighted distribution methods', Environmetrics 2, 377–423.Google Scholar
  38. Pearson, J. and Loeschke, M.: 1992, ‘Floristic composition and conservation status of fens in Iowa', Journal of the Iowa Academy of Sciences 99, 41–52.Google Scholar
  39. Rice, J. S. and Pinkerton, B. W.: 1993, ‘Reed canarygrass survival under cyclic inundation', Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 48, 132–135.Google Scholar
  40. Richardson, J. L., Arndt, J. L. and Freeland, J.: 1994, ‘Wetland soils of the prairie potholes', Advances in Agronomy 52, 121–171.Google Scholar
  41. Richter, K. O. and Azous, A. L.: 1995, ‘Amphibian occurrence and wetland characteristics in the Puget Sound Basin', Wetlands 15, 305–312.Google Scholar
  42. Rohlf, F. J.: 1994, NTSYS-pc: Numerican Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Exeter Software, Setauket, New York.Google Scholar
  43. Ruszczyk, A.: 1986, ‘Distribution and abundance of butterflies in the urbanization zones of Porto Alegre, Brazil', Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 25, 157–178.Google Scholar
  44. Ruszczyk, A. and DeAraujo, A. M.: 1992, ‘Gradients in butterfly species diversity in an urban area in Brazil', Journal of the Lepidopteran Society 46, 255–264.Google Scholar
  45. SAS Institute, Inc.: 1996, SAS Release 6.12. Cary, NC, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  46. Schindler, D. W.: 1987, ‘Detecting ecosystem responses to anthropogenic stress', Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 44(Suppl. 1), 6–25.Google Scholar
  47. Sheaffer, C. C., Peterson, P. R., Hall, M. H. and Stordahl, J. B.: 1992, ‘Drought effects on yield and quality of perennial grasses in the north central United States', J. Prod. Agric. 5, 556–561.Google Scholar
  48. Smart, P.: 1995, HydroCAD Stormwater Modeling System Manual, Applied Microcomputer Systems, Chocorua, CA.Google Scholar
  49. Sokal, R. R. and Michener, C. D.: 1958, ‘A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships', University of Kansas Science Bulletin 38, 1409–1438.Google Scholar
  50. State of Minnesota: 1997, Minnesota Wetlands Conservation Plan, Version 1.0. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul, Minnesota.Google Scholar
  51. Stewart, R. E. and Kantrud, H. A.: 1971, Classification of Natural Ponds and Lakes in the Glaciated Prairie Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, U.S.A. Resource Publication 92.Google Scholar
  52. Verhoeven, J. T. A., Koerselman, W. and Beltman, B.: 1988, ‘The vegetation of fens in relation to their hydrology and nutrient dynamics: a case study', in: J. J. Symoens (ed.), Vegetation of Inland Waters, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  53. Waters, I. and Shay, J. M.: 1990, ‘A field study of the morphometric response of Typha glauca shoots to a water depth gradient', Canadian Journal of Botany 68, 2339–2343.Google Scholar
  54. Waters, I. and Shay, J. M.: 1992, ‘Effect of water depth on population parameters of a Typha glauca stand’ Canadian Journal of Botany 70, 349–351.Google Scholar
  55. WCMC (World Conservation Monitoring Centre): 1992, Global Biodiversity: Status of the Earth's Living Resources, Chapman and Hall, London, 594 pp.Google Scholar
  56. Whited, D. C., Galatowitsch, S. M., Tester, J., Lehtinen, R., Schik, K. and Husveth, J.: ‘The effects of local and landscape pattern on animal assemblages in glacial marshes', Landscape Ecology (in review).Google Scholar
  57. Wienhold, C. E. and Van der Valk, A. G.: 1989, ‘The impact of duration of drainage on the seed banks of northern prairie wetlands', Canadian Journal of Botany 67, 1878–1884.Google Scholar
  58. Wilcox, D. A.: 1986, ‘The effects of deicing salts on vegetation in Pinhook Bog, Indiana’ Canadian Journal of Botany 64, 865–874.Google Scholar
  59. Wilkins, F. S. and Hughes, H. D.: 1932, ‘Agronomic trials with reed canarygrass', Journal of the American Society of Agronomy 24, 18–28.Google Scholar
  60. Yamamoto, M.: 1977, ‘A comparison of butterflies assemblages in and near Sapporo City, Northern Japan’ Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Series 6, Zoology 20, 621–646 (not seen).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan M. Galatowitsch
    • 1
  • Diane C. Whited
    • 2
  • Richard Lehtinen
    • 2
  • Jason Husveth
    • 2
  • Karen Schik
    • 2
  1. 1.Departments of Horticultural Science and Landscape ArchitectureUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulU.S.A.
  2. 2.Departments of Horticultural Science and Landscape ArchitectureUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations