Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 54, Issue 2, pp 109–115

Quality of life in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated with conservative surgery and postoperative irradiation

  • Maurizio Amichetti
  • Orazio Caffo
  • Mauro Arcicasa
  • Mario Roncadin
  • Ornella Lora
  • Alberto Rigon
  • Giampaolo Zini
  • Luciano Armaroli
  • Francesca Coghetto
  • Pierluigi Zorat
  • Stefanoti Neri
  • Nazario Teodorani
Article

Abstract

Aim of the study: To evaluate the quality of life (QL) in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated with conservative surgery and postoperative irradiation.

Material and methods: A self‐completed questionnaire covering many disease‐, symptom‐, and treatment‐specific issues was administered to 106 conservatively treated patients affected by non‐infiltrating breast cancer. The questionnaire was based on a series of 34 items assessing five main fields of post‐treatment adjustment: physical well being, sexual adaptation, aesthetic outcome, emotional/psychological well being, relational behaviour. Furthermore, the patients were requested to evaluate the degree of information provided by the medical staff concerning surgical procedures and radiation therapy, and to evaluate the effects of the treatment on their social and overall life.

Results: The questionnaire was completed by 83 patients (78%), who had a median follow‐up of 54.5 months. This final sample had a median age of 50 years (range 29–88) at the time of treatment and 54 years (range 32–94) at the time of study. The patients claimed to be in good physical condition. Data relating to sexual life were provided by 93% of the sample. Some limitations in sexuality, some interference with sexual desire, and some modifications during intercourse were reported by 5, 6, and 5 patients, respectively. The subjective evaluations of the cosmetic results of the therapies were generally good. Only 13 patients (16%) reported the perception of a worsened body image. Forty‐six percent of the sample (38 patients) declared that they felt tense, 48% (39 patients) nervous, 29% (38 patients) lonely, 59% (41 patients) anxious, and 41% (34 patients) depressed. Only seven patients (8%) declared that the treatment had had a bad effect on their social life, and 15 (18%) thought that their current life had been affected by the treatment. The amount of information received concerning the disease and treatment (surgery and radiotherapy) was considered sufficient by 79%, 75%, and 79% of the sample, respectively.

Conclusions: This study revealed a good QL in patients treated with breast conservation and postoperative irradiation, with a preserved favourable body image and a lack of negative impact on sexuality. Radiation therapy did not lead to any significant additional problems capable of affecting the QL.

breast conservation DCIS quality of life radiotherapy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Frykberg ER, Bland KI: Overview of the biology and management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer 74: 350–361, 1994Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lagios MD: Duct carcinoma in situ. Surg Clin North Am 4: 859–871, 1990Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garfinkel L, Boring CC, Heath CW Jr: Changing trends: an overview of breast cancer incidence and mortality. Cancer 74: 222–227, 1994Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ernster VL, Barclay J, Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Henderson C: Incidence and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Am Med Assoc 275: 913–918, 1996Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Winchester DP, Menck HR, Osteen RT, Kraybill W: Treatment trends in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol 2: 207–213, 1995Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sharma S, Hill ADK, McDermott EW, O'Higgins NJ: Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast – current management. Eur J Surg Oncol 23: 191–197, 1997Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meyerowitz BE: Psychological correlates of breast cancer and its treatment. Psychol Bull 87: 108–131, 1980Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Levy SM, Haynes LT, Herberman RB, Lee J, McFeeley S, Kirkwood J: Mastectomy versus breast conservation surgery: mental health effects at long-term follow-up. Health Psychol 11: 349–354, 1992Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maguire P, Selby P: Assessing quality of life in cancer patients. Br J Cancer 60: 437–440, 1990Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Spilker B, Molinek F, Johnston K, Simpson RL Jr, Tilson HH: Quality of life bibliography and indexes. Med Care 28 Suppl, DS1–77, 1990Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wilkin D, Hallam L, Doggett M: Measures of Need and Outcome for Primary Care. Oxford, University Press, Oxford, 1992Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Katz S: The science of quality of life. J Chron Dis 6: 459–463, 1987Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Donovan K, Sanson-Fisher RW, Redman S: Measuring quality of life in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 7: 959–968, 1989Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Amichetti M, Caffo O, Richetti A, Zini G, Rigon A, Antonello M, Arcicasa M, Coghetto F, Valdagni R, Maluta S, Di Marco A: Ten year results of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with conservative surgery and radiotherapy. Eur J Cancer 33: 1559–1565, 1997Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Caffo O, Ambrosini G, Agugiaro S, Eccher C, Maluta S: The influence of both surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy on breast cancer women's quality of life. In: Banzet, Holland, Khayat, Weil (eds) Cancer Treatment Update. Springer-Verlag, Paris, 1994, pp 677–680Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Caffo O, Fellin G, Graffer U, Luciani L: Assessment of quality of life after radical radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Br J Urology 78: 557–563, 1996Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Caffo O, Fellin G, Graffer U, Luciani L: Cancer assessment of quality of life after cystectomy or conservative therapy for infiltrating bladder cancer: survey by a self-administered questionnaire. Cancer 78: 1089–1097, 1996Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Armitage P, Berry G: Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Oxford, Blackwell, 1987Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stefanek ME: Quality of life and other psychosocial issues in breast cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 6: 583–586, 1994Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F, Bonomi AE, Tulsky DS, Lloyd SR, Deasy S, Cobleigh M, Shiomoto G: Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy – breast quality of life instrument. J Clin Oncol 15: 974–986, 1997Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Levine MN, Guyatt GH, Gent M, De Pauw S, Goodyear MD, Hryniuk WM, Arnold A, Findlay B, Skilling JR, Bramwell VH: Quality of life in stage II breast cancer: an instrument for clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 6: 1798–1810, 1988Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fallowfield LJ: Assessment of quality of life in breast cancer. Acta Oncol 34: 689–694, 1995Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Graydon EJ: Women with breast cancer: their quality of life following a course of radiation therapy. J Adv Nurs 19: 617–622, 1994Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Maguire GP, Lee EG, Bevington DJ, Kuchemann CS, Crabtree RJ, Cornell CE: Psychiatric problems in the first year after mastectomy. Brit Med J 1: 963–965, 1978Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Morris T, Greer HS, White P: Psychological and social adjustment to mastectomy. Cancer 40: 2381–2387, 1977Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jameson KR, Wellisch DK, Pasnau RO: Psychosocial aspects of mastectomy: I. The woman's perspective. Am J Psych 135: 432–436, 1978Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wellisch DK, Jameson KR, Pasnau RO: Psychosocial aspects of mastectomy: II. The man's perspective. AmJ Psych 135: 543–546, 1978Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fallowfield LJ, Hall A, Maguire GP, Baum M: Psychological outcome of different treatment policies in women with breast cancer outside a clinical trial. Brit Med J 301: 575–580, 1990Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    McArdle JM, Hughson AVM, McArdle CS: Reduced psychological morbidity after breast conservation. Brit J Surg 77: 1221–1223, 1990Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Maunsell E, Brisson J, Deschenes L: Psychological distress after initial treatment for breast cancer: a comparison of partial and total mastectomy. JClin Epidemiol 42: 765–771, 1989Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Steinberg MD, Juliano MA, Wise L: Psychological outcome of lumpectomy versus mastectomy in the treatment of breast cancer. Am J Psychiatry 142: 34–39, 1985Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hietanen PS: Measurement and practical aspects of quality of life in breast cancer. Acta Oncol 35: 39–42, 1996Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kiebert GM, deHaes JC, van de Velde CJ: The impact of breast conserving treatment and mastectomy on the quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients: a review. J Clin Oncol 9: 1059–1070, 1991Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Norhouse LL: Psychological impact of the diagnosis of breast cancer on the patient and her family. J Am Med Womens Assoc 47: 161–164, 1992Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pettingale KW, Burgess C, Greer S: Psychological response to cancer diagnosis: correlations with prognostic variables. J Psychosom Res 32: 255–261, 1988Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Webb C, Koch T: Women's experiences of noninvasive breast cancer: literature review and study support. J Adv Nurs 25: 514–525, 1997Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kalinowsky B: Local therapy for breast cancer: treatment choices and decision making. Semin Oncol Nurs 7: 187–193, 1991Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kelly PT, Wellisch DK: Talking to patients with noninvasive breast cancer. Information relieves anxiety and facilitates informed consent. In: Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Poller DN, Recht A (eds) Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the Breast. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1997, pp 315–323Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hoffman RS: Psychologic impact of noninvasive breast cancer. In: Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Poller DN, Recht A (eds) Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the Breast. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1997, pp 307–313Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Silverman DC, Edbril S, Gartrell N, Wise N, Botnick L, Liao-Rosemblatt E, Huntley B: A pilot study of women's attitude towards breast-conserving surgery with primary radiation therapy for breast cancer. Int J Psychiatry Med 15: 381–391, 1985Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Watson M, Greer S, Rowden L, Gorman C, Robertson B, Bliss JM, Tunmore R: Relationship between emotional control, adjustment to cancer and depression and anxiety in breast cancer patients. Psych Med 21: 51–57, 1991Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    van Heeringen C, van Moffaert M, de Cuypere G: Depression after surgery for breast cancer. Psychother Psychosomatics 51: 175–179, 1989Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Maraste R, Brandt L, Olsson H, Ryde Brandt B: Anxiety and depression in breast cancer patients at start of adjuvant radiotherapy. Acta Oncol 31: 641–643, 1992Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Holland JC, Rowland J, Lebovits A: Reactions to cancer treatments: assessment of emotional response to adjuvant radiotherapy as a guide to planned intervention. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2: 347–358, 1979Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Margolis G, Goodman R, Rubin A: Psychological effects of breast conserving cancer treatment and mastectomy. Psychosomatics 31: 33–39, 1990Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Omne-Pontin M, Holmberg L, Burns T, Adami H, Bergstrom R: Determinants of the psycho-social outcome after operation for breast cancer. Results of a prospective comparative interviewstudy following mastectomy and breast conservation. Eur J Cancer 28A: 1062–1067, 1992Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Irvine RN, Brown B, Crooks D, Roberts J, Browne G: Psychosocial adjustment in women with breast cancer. Cancer 67: 1097–1117, 1991Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Margolis GJ, Goodman RL: Psychological factors in women choosing radiation therapy for breast cancer. Psychosomatics 25: 464–469, 1984Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wainstock J: Breast cancer: psychosocial consequences for the patients. Semin Oncol Nurs 7: 207–215, 1991Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Stefanek ME: Psychosocial aspects of breast cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 5: 996–1000, 1993Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mills JM, Schultz DJ, Solin LJ: Preservation of cosmesis with low complication risk after conservative surgery and radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 39: 637–641, 1997Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Poulsen B, Graversen HP, Beckmann J, Blichert-Toft M: A comparative study of post-operative psychosocial function in women with primary operable breast cancer randomized to breast conservation therapy or mastectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 23: 327–334, 1997Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hickson GB, Clayton EW, Entman SS, Miller CS, Githens PB, Whetten-Goldstein K: Obstetricians' prior malpractice experience and patients' satisfaction with care. J Am Med Assoc 272: 1583–1587, 1994Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Suominen T: Breast cancer patients' opportunities to participate in their care. Cancer Nurs 15: 68–72, 1992Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Cassileth BR, Zupkis RV, Sutton-Smith K, March V: Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med 92: 832–836, 1980, 87: 108–131, 1980Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maurizio Amichetti
    • 1
  • Orazio Caffo
    • 1
  • Mauro Arcicasa
    • 2
  • Mario Roncadin
    • 2
  • Ornella Lora
    • 3
  • Alberto Rigon
    • 3
  • Giampaolo Zini
    • 4
  • Luciano Armaroli
    • 4
  • Francesca Coghetto
    • 5
  • Pierluigi Zorat
    • 5
  • Stefanoti Neri
    • 6
  • Nazario Teodorani
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Radiation Oncology of TrentoItaly
  2. 2.Department of Radiation Oncology of AvianoItaly
  3. 3.Department of Radiation Oncology of PadovaItaly
  4. 4.Department of Radiation Oncology of Reggio EmiliaItaly
  5. 5.Department of Radiation Oncology of TrevisoItaly
  6. 6.Department of Radiation Oncology of BolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations