Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 539–549 | Cite as

Estimates of the abortion demand of young and older teenagers

  • Marshall H. Medoff
Article

Abstract

This study estimates the demand for abortion by younger (ages 15–17) and older (ages 18–19) teenagers. The empirical results show, for both age groups, abortion demand is price inelastic and a normal good with respect to income. Teenage abortion demand is also found to be positively related to labor force participation and state Medicaid funding and negatively related to religiosity and unemployment. State family planning programs, AFDC benefits, and parental involvement laws are found not to be significant determinants of teenage abortion demand.

Teenage Abortion Demand Estimates 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akerlot, G., Yellen, J. & Katz, M. (1996). An analysis of out-of-wedlock childbearing in the United States, Quarterly Journal of Economics 101: 277-318.Google Scholar
  2. Ammerman, N. T. (1987). Bible Believers. NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G. S. (1973). A theory of marriage, Journal of Political Economy 81: 813-846.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S. & Lewis, H. G. (1973). On the interaction between quantity and quality of children, Journal of Political Economy 81: S279-S288.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, R W. & Jewell, R. T. (1996). The impact of provider availability on abortion demand, Contemporary Economic Policy 14: 95-106.Google Scholar
  6. Cartoof, V & Klerman, L. (1986). Parental consent for abortion: Impact of the Massachusetts law, American Journal of Public Health 76: 397-400.Google Scholar
  7. Cooksey, E. C. (1990). Factors in the resolution of adolescent premarital pregnancies, Demography 27: 207-218.Google Scholar
  8. Currie, J., Nixon, L. & Cole, N. (1996). Restrictions on Medicaid funding of abortion, Journal of Human Resources 31: 159-188.Google Scholar
  9. DeTray, D. N. (1973). Child quality and the demand for children, Journal of Political Economy 81: S70-S95.Google Scholar
  10. Duncan, G. J. & Hoffman, S. D. (1990). Welfare benefits, economic opportunities, and out-of-wedlock births among black teenage girls, Demography 27: 519-535.Google Scholar
  11. Frost, J. J. (1996). Family planning clinic services in the United States, 1994, Family Planning Perspectives 28: 92-100.Google Scholar
  12. Gohmann, S. F. & Ohsfeldt, R. L. (1993). Effects of price and availability on abortion demand, Contemporary Policy Issues 11: 42-54.Google Scholar
  13. Henshaw, S. K. & Kost, K (1992). Parental involvement in minors' abortion decisions, Family Planning Perspectives 24: 196-213.Google Scholar
  14. King, R. H., Myers, S. C. & Byrne, D.M. (1992). The demand for abortion by unmarried teenagers, American Journal of Economics and Sociology 51: 223-235.Google Scholar
  15. Leibowitz, A., Eisen, M. & Chow, W. K. (1986). An economic model of teenage pregnancy decision-making, Demography 23: 67-77Google Scholar
  16. Lundberg, S. & Plotnick, R. D. (1995). Adolescent premarital childbearing: Do economic incentives matter, Journal of Labor Economics 13: 177-200.Google Scholar
  17. Medoff, M. H. (1988). An economic analysis of the demand for abortions, Economic Inquiry 26: 353-359.Google Scholar
  18. Medoff, M. H. (1993). An empirical analysis of adoption, Economic Inquiry 31: 59-70.Google Scholar
  19. Michael, R. T. (1973). Education and the derived demand for children, Journal of Political Economy 81: S128-S164.Google Scholar
  20. Mincer, J. (1963). Market prices, opportunity costs, and income effects, in Measurement in Economics: Studies in Mathematical Economics and Econometrics, pp. 67-82. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Quinn, B., Bradley, M., Goettinghall, P. & Shriver, P. (1993). Churches and Church Membership in the United States. Atlanta: Glenmary Research Center.Google Scholar
  22. Rogers, J. L., Boruch, R. F., Stoms, G. B. & Demoya, D. (1991). Impact of Minnesota parental notification law on abortions and births, American Journal of Public Health 81: 294-298.Google Scholar
  23. U.S. Bureau of the Census (1993). State reports, social and economic characteristics, 1990. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  24. Willis, R. (1973). A new approach to the economic theory of fertility behavior, Journal of Political Economy 81: S14–S64.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marshall H. Medoff
    • 1
  1. 1.California State University, Long BeachLong BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations