Skip to main content
Log in

Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from undeveloped ovules and stigma/style explants of sweet orange navel group [ Citrus sinensis (L.) Osb.]

  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Somatic embryogenesis was induced and plant regeneration was obtained in 11 different genotypes of sweet orange navel group [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osb.] from cultures of stigma/style explants and undeveloped ovules. Explants were cultured on 3 different modifications of Murashige and Skoog medium: 500 mg l-1 malt extract; 500 mg l-1 malt extract and 4.6 μM kinetin; and 500 mg l-1 malt extract and 13.3 μM 6-benzylaminopurine. Sucrose (146 mM) was used as carbon source. Somatic embryogenesis occurred 1–3 months after culture initiation from undeveloped ovule and stigma/style cultures of all the genotypes tested. Somatic embryos developed into plantlets with a high frequency (74%) after transfer to Murashige and Skoog medium supplemented with 146 mM sucrose and 500 mg l-1 malt extract. Plants were successfully transferred to soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bitters WP, Murashige T, Rangan TS & Nauer E (1970) Investigations on established virus-free plants through tissue culture. Calif Citrus Nursery Soc 9: 27–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Button J & Bornman CH (1971) Development of nucellar plants from unpollinated and unfertilized ovules of the Washington navel orange in vitro. J S Afr Bot 37: 127–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Button J, Kochba J & Bornman CH (1974) Fine structure of and embryoid development from embryogenic ovular callus of ‘shamouti’ orange (Citrus sinensis Osb.). J Exp Bot 25: 446–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Carimi F, De Pasquale F & Crescimanno FG (1995) Somatic embryogenesis in Citrus from style culture. Plant Sci 105: 81–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gavish H, Vardi A & Fluhr R (1991) Extracellular proteins and early embryo development in Citrus nucellar cell cultures. Physiol Plant 82: 606–616

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gill MIS, Singh Z, Dhillon BS & Gosal SS (1995) Somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration in mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco). Sci Hortic 63: 167–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litz RE, Moore GA & Srinivasan C (1985) In vitro system for propagation and improvement of tropical fruits and palm. Hort Rev 7: 157–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore GA (1985) Factors affecting in vitro embryogenesis from undeveloped ovules of mature Citrus fruit. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 110: 66–70

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T & Tucker DPH (1969) Growth factor requirements of citrus tissue culture. Proc First Intern Citrus Symp 3: 1155–1161

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nito N & Iwamasa M (1990) In vitro plantlet formation from juice vesicle callus of satsuma (Citrus unshiu Marc.). Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 20: 137–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starrantino A & Russo F (1980) Seedlings from undeveloped ovules of ripe fruits of polyembryonic citrus cultivars. Hort Science 15: 296–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel RDG & Torrie JH (1980) Principles and procedures of statistics. (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carimi, F., Tortorici, M.C., De Pasquale, F. et al. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from undeveloped ovules and stigma/style explants of sweet orange navel group [ Citrus sinensis (L.) Osb.]. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 54, 183–189 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006113731428

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006113731428

Navigation