Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 1–11 | Cite as

Forage production of woody fodder species and herbaceous vegetation in a silvopastoral system in northern Greece

  • A. B. Ainalis
  • C. N. TsiouvarasEmail author


Introduction of woody plants in silvopastoral systems could be an appropriate land-use for the poor sandy soils of the Mediterranean semiarid zone. Forage production of four woody fodder species and herbaceous vegetation in relation to plant spacing and animal (sheep) grazing was studied in a silvopastoral system on such a site in Macedonia, northern Greece. The woody fodder species tested were Robinia pseudoacacia L., Gleditsia triacanthos L., Amorpha fruticosa L. and Morus alba L. They were planted at the spacings 1.5 × 1.5 m,2.5 × 2.5 m and 3.5 × 3.5 m and kept in a shrubby form by topping. They were grazed by sheep (stocking rate of 1.1 sheep/ha/year) in early July and late August of 1992, 1993 and 1994. Among the species Robinia yielded the highest forage production (394 kg/ha). The spacing 1.5 × 1.5 m had the highest (P ≥ 0.05) forage production per area unit (280 kg/ha) while the spacing 3.5 × 3.5 m had the highest forage production per plant (91.8 g/plant). No competition was observed between the woody and the herbaceous plants in the various spacings probably due to topping of the woody species every winter. Percent utilisation of the native herbage dropped as forage of the woody species increased.

Robinia pseudoacacia semiarid zone sheep summer grazing wood deciduous fodder species 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ainalis AB (1996) Growth dynamics, production and nutritive value of some shrubby form species in relation to spacing and grazing. PhD Dissertation, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GreeceGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett RP (1992) Forage plantation management for Black Locust. In: Hanover JW, Miller K and Plesko S (eds) Proc of Intern Conf on Black Locust: Biology, Culture and Utilization. pp 259–272. Michigan State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  3. Cook CW (1972) Comparative nutritive values of forbs, grasses and shrubs. In: McKell CM, JP Blaisdell and JR Goodin (eds) Wildland Shrubs their Biology and Utilization, pp 303–370. USDA, For Serv Gen Tech Rep. INT-1Google Scholar
  4. Cook CW and Stubbendieck J (1986) Range Research: Basic Problems and Techniques. Soc Range Manage, Denver CO, 317 ppGoogle Scholar
  5. Darrow WK (1984) Biomass production of Eucalyptus grantisin South Africa planted at various close espacements: two years results. Suid-Afrikaanse Bosboutydskrif 12: 34–39Google Scholar
  6. Emberger L (1942) Un project d’ une classification des climats du point de vue phytogeographigue. Bul Soc D’ Historie Nuturelle de Toulouse 77: 97–124Google Scholar
  7. Forti M, Lavie Y, Benjamin RW, Barkai D and Hefetz Y (1987) Standing biomass of three species of fodder shrubs planted at five densities 18 months after planting. In: Proceedings of the 5th Meeting of FAO Sub-network on Mediterranean Pastures, pp 86–90. Montrellier, FranceGoogle Scholar
  8. Keresztesi B (1988) The black locust. Forestry Monograph Series of the Agricultural Science Department of the Hungarian Academy of Science. Ed. B Keresztesi. Budapest, 197 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. Le Houerou HN (1985) Forage and fuel plants in the arid zone of North Africa, the Near and Middle East. In: Plants for Arid Lands. Royal Botanic Gardens. Kew, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  10. Le Houerou HN (1993) Environmental aspects of fodder trees and shrubs plantation in the mediterranean basin. In: Papanastasis V (ed) Fodder Trees and Shrubs in the Mediterranean Production Systems: Objectives and Expected Results, pp 11–34. Agriculture Agrimed Res Progr, EUR 14459 ENGoogle Scholar
  11. Lovenstein HM, Berliner PR and Hvan Keulen (1991) Runoff agroforestry in arid lands. For Ecol Manage 45: 59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nastis AS, Noitsakis B, Tsiouvaras CN, Koukoura Z and Ispikoudis I (1997) Agrosilvopastoralism-perspectives for alternative use of marginal lands. Proc 1st National Range Soc Congress on ‘Sustainable Use of Rangelands and Pastures’, pp 181–187. Aristotle University, 54006 Thessaloniki, GreeceGoogle Scholar
  13. Olea L, Paredes J and Verdasco P (1992) Evaluation, selection techniques and utilization of the shrubs and fodder trees on the semi-arid conditions of the SW of Iberian peninsula. Proceedings of the EEC–CAMAR 8001-CT90-0030, pp 93–100. Research Project Meeting held at Palermo, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  14. Papachristou TG and Papanastasis VP (1994) Forage value of Mediterranean deciduous woody fodder species and its implication to management of silvo-pastoral systems for goats. Agrofor Syst 27: 269?282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Papanastasis V (1993) Fodder trees and shrubs in the mediterranean production sustems: objectives and expected results of the EC research contract, pp 3–8. Agriculture, Agrimed Res Progr, EUR 14459 ENGoogle Scholar
  16. Papanastasis VP, Platis PD and Dini-Papanastasi O (1997) Productivity of deciduous woody and fodder species in relation to air temperature and precipitation in a Mediterranean environment. Agrofor Syst 37: 187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Platis PD and Papanastasis VP (1993) Productivity of deciduous fodder trees and shrubs in relation to the year of cutting. In: Proceedings of the 7th Meeting of FAO Sub-network on Mediterranean Pastures and Fodder Crops, p. 47. Chania (Crete), GreeceGoogle Scholar
  18. Steel RGD and Torrie JH (1980) Principles and procedures of statistics. 2nd Ed McGraw-Hill Book Co Inc, NYGoogle Scholar
  19. Stringi L, Sarno R, Mato G, Leto G, Gristina L and Corrao A (1987) Shrubs utilisation in semiarid environment: bio-agronomic aspects and their use in sheep husbandry. World Rev Anim Prod 23: 79–90Google Scholar
  20. Tsiouvaras CN (1988) Long term effects of clipping on production and vigor of kermes oak (Quercus coccifera). For Ecol Manage 24: 159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tsiouvaras CN and Nastis AS (1990) Browse production and nutritive value of some fodder shrubs and trees in a semi-arid environment in Greece. In: Proceedings of the 6th Meeting of FAO on Mediterranean pastures and fodder crops, pp 169–172. Bari, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  22. Tsiouvaras CN, Koukoura Z, Platis P and Ainalis A (1998) Yearly changes in vegetation of a semi-arid grassland under various stocking rates and grazing systems. Proc Int Workshop on ‘Ecological Basis of Livestock Grazing in Mediterranean Ecosystems’, 23–25 October 1997, Thessaloniki, Greece (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Forest ServiceLagadasGreece
  2. 2.Range Science LaboratoryAristotle UniversityThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations