Systematic Parasitology

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 1–8 | Cite as

Taxonomic status of Pelichnibothrium speciosum Monticelli, 1889 (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea), a mysterious parasite of Alepisaurus ferox Lowe (Teleostei: Alepisauridae) and Prionace glauca (L.) (Euselachii: Carcharinidae)

  • Tomáš Scholz
Article

Abstract

Comparison of freshly collected tetraphyllidean cestodes from a teleost fish, Alepisaurus ferox Lowe, from Japan with types and vouchers of Pelichnibothrium speciosum Monticelli, 1889, described from the same host, and specimens of Prionacestus bipartitus Mete & Euzet, 1996, from the spiral valve of a shark, Prionace glauca (Linnaeus), from the Indian Ocean between Réunion and Madagascar, revealed their conspecificity. Consequently, P. bipartitus is considered a junior synonym of P. speciosum and the genus Prionacestus Mete & Euzet, 1996 is suppressed. The life-cycle of the parasite, which retains larval features and is considered to represent a neotenic form, is discussed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Braun, M. (1894–1900) Vermes. Abteilung I. b. Cestodes. In: Dr. H.G. Bronn's Klassen und Ordnungen des Thier-Reichs, wissenschaftlich dargestellt in Wort und Bild. Vierter Band. Leipzig, pp. 927–1731 + 59 plates.Google Scholar
  2. Dubinina, M.N. (1971) Cestodes from fishes of the River Amur basin. Parazitologicheskii Sbornik, 25, 77–119. (In Russian).Google Scholar
  3. Euzet, L. (1959) Recherches sur les cestodes tétraphyllides des sélaciens des côtes de France. Thèse, University of Montpellier; published by Causse Graille Castelnau, Montpellier, pp. 7–263.Google Scholar
  4. Euzet, L. (1994) Tetraphyllidea. In: Khalil, L.F., Jones, A. & Bray, R.A. (Eds) Key to the cestode parasites of vertebrates. Wallingford: CAB International, pp. 149–194.Google Scholar
  5. Mete, K. & Euzet L. (1996) Prionacestus bipartitus n. gen., n. sp. (Cestoda, Tetraphyllidea), un cas de néotenie. Parasite, 4, 363–366.Google Scholar
  6. Monticelli, F.S. (1889) Notes on some Entozoa in the collection of British Museum. Proceedings of the Zoological Society, London, (1889), 321–325.Google Scholar
  7. Mudry, D.R. & Dailey, M.D. (1971) Postembryonic development of certain tetraphyllidean and trypanorhynchan cestodes with a possible alternative life cycle for the order Trypanorhyncha. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 49, 1249–1253.Google Scholar
  8. Schmidt, G.D. (1986) Handbook of tapeworm identification. Boca Raton: CRC Press Inc., 675 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Southwell, T. (1925) A monograph on the Tetraphyllidea with notes on related cestodes. Memoirs of the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, new series, No. 2, 363 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Wardle, R.A. & McLeod, J.A. (1952) The zoology of tapeworms. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 780 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Whitehead, P.J.P., Bauchot, M.-L., Hureau, J.-C., Nielsen, J. & Tortonese, E. (Eds) (1984) Fishes of the North-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. Paris: UNESCO, Vol. I, 510 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Williams, H. & Jones, A. (1994) Parasitic worms of fish. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd., 593 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Yamaguti, S. (1934) Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan. Part 4. Cestodes of fishes. Japanese Journal of Parasitology, 6, 1–112.Google Scholar
  14. Yamaguti, S. (1952) Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan. Part 49. Cestodes of fishes, II. Acta Medicinae Okayama, 8, 1–76 + 22 Plts.Google Scholar
  15. Yamaguti, S. (1959) Systema helminthum. Vol. II. The cestodes of vertebrates. New York: Interscience Publishers Inc., 860 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomáš Scholz

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations