Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 17, Issue 9–10, pp 1093–1102 | Cite as

The Stakeholder Theory and the Common Good

  • Antonio Argandoña
Article

Abstract

The theory of the social responsibility of the firm oscillates between two extremes: one that reduces the firm's responsibility to the obtainment of (the greatest possible) profit for its shareholders, and another that extends the firm's responsibility to include a wide range of actors with an interest or "stake" in the firm. The stakeholder theory of the social responsibility of business is more appealing from an ethical point of view, and yet it lacks a solid foundation that would be acceptable to a variety of schools of thought.

In this paper I argue that the stakeholder theory could be founded on the concept of the common good. First, I explain the foundations of the theory of the common good, the concept itself, how it relates to the individual good, and its role in the firm. Following that, I explain how the theory of the common good could be applied to the stakeholder theory. Finally, I draw some conclusions.

Keywords

Economic Growth Social Responsibility Stake Common Good Stakeholder Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boatright, J. R.: 1994, ‘Fiduciary Duties and the Shareholder-Management Relation: Or, What's So Special About Shareholders?’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4) (October).Google Scholar
  2. Brenner, S. N. and P. Cochran: 1990, ‘A Stakeholder Theory of the Firm’, Working Paper MGMT 90–1 (Portland State University, Portland, Oregon).Google Scholar
  3. Brenner, S. N. and P. Cochran: 1991, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Firm: Implications for Business and Society Theory and Practice’, Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society(Sundance, Utah).Google Scholar
  4. Burton, B. K. and C. P. Dunn: 1996, ‘Feminist Ethics as Moral Grounding for Stakeholder Theory’, Business Ethics Quarterly 6(2) (April).Google Scholar
  5. Calvez, Y. and J. Perrin: 1959, Eglise et société économique(Paris).Google Scholar
  6. Carroll, A.: 1989, Business and Society(South Western, Cincinnati).Google Scholar
  7. Carson, T. L.: 1993, ‘Does the Stakeholder Theory Constitute a New Kind of Theory of Social Responsibility?’, Business Ethics Quarterly 3(2) (April).Google Scholar
  8. Donaldson, T.: 1989, The Ethics of International Business(Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  9. Dunn, C.: 1990, ‘The Stakeholder Approach as Ethical Theory: A Critical Review’, paper presented at the Academy of Management annual meeting.Google Scholar
  10. Dunn, C. and N. Brady: 1995, ‘From Rules to Relationships: A Review of the Search for an Ethical Justification of Stakeholder Interests’, Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society.Google Scholar
  11. Evan, W. M. and R. E. Freeman: 1993, ‘A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism’, in T. Beauchamp and N Bowie (ed.), Ethical Theory and Business, 4th. ed. (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs).Google Scholar
  12. Finnis, J.: 1983, Fundamentals of Ethics(Clarendon Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  13. Follett, M. P.: 1996, Prophet of Management(Harvard University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  14. Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach(Pitman Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  15. Freeman, R. E.: 1994, ‘The Politics of Shareholder Theory: Some Future Directions’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4) (October).Google Scholar
  16. Freeman, R. E. and D. R. Gilbert: 1988, Corporate Strategy and the Search for Ethics(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs).Google Scholar
  17. Freeman, R. E. and D. R. Gilbert: 1992, ‘Business Ethics and Society: A Critical Agenda’, Business & Society 31(1).Google Scholar
  18. Freeman, R. E. and D. L. Reed: 1983, ‘Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance’, California Management Review 25(Spring).Google Scholar
  19. Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, The New York Times Magazine(September 13th).Google Scholar
  20. Goodpaster, K. E.: 1991, ‘Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis’, Business Ethics Quarterly 1(1) (January).Google Scholar
  21. Goodpaster, K. E. and T. E. Holloran: 1994, ‘In Defense of a Paradox’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4) (October).Google Scholar
  22. Hosseini, J. C. and S. N. Brenner: 1992, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Firm: A Methodology to Generate Value Matrix Weights’, Business Ethics Quarterly 2(2) (April).Google Scholar
  23. Langtry, B.: 1994, ‘Stakeholders and the Moral Responsibility of Business’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4) (October).Google Scholar
  24. Maitland, I.: 1994, ‘The Morality of the Corporation: An Empirical or Normative Disagreement?’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4) (October).Google Scholar
  25. Maritain, J.: 1966a, The Person and the Common Good(University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame).Google Scholar
  26. Maritain, J.: 1966b, Humanismo integral(Lohlé, Buenos Aires).Google Scholar
  27. Millan-Puelles, A.: 1968, Persona humana y justicia social(Rialp, Madrid).Google Scholar
  28. Millan-Puelles, A.: 1971, ‘Bien comÚn’, en Gran Enciclopedia Rialp, vol. IV (Rialp, Madrid).Google Scholar
  29. Millan-Puelles, A.: 1974, Economía y Libertad(Confederación Española de Cajas de Ahorro, Madrid).Google Scholar
  30. Mitroff, I. I.: 1983, Stakeholders of the Organization Mind(Jossey Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  31. Parker, P.: 1996, ‘Most Quoted - Least Heeded: The Five Senses of Follett’, in M. P. Follett (1996).Google Scholar
  32. Phillips, R. A.: 1997, ‘Stakeholder Theory and a Principle of Fairness’, Business Ethics Quarterly 7(1) (January).Google Scholar
  33. Ramírez, S. M.: s.f., La doctrina política de Santo Tomás(CSIC, Madrid).Google Scholar
  34. Schlossberger, E.: 1994, ‘A New Model of Business: Dual-Investor Theory’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4) (October).Google Scholar
  35. Second Vatican Council: 1965, ‘Gaudium et spes’, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 58, 1966.Google Scholar
  36. Todolí, J.: s.f., El bien comÚn(Madrid).Google Scholar
  37. Velásquez, M.: 1992, ‘International Business, Morality, and the Coommon Good’, Business Ethics Quarterly 2(1) (January).Google Scholar
  38. Wallace, W. A.: 1977, The Elements of Philosophy.A Compendium for Philosophers and Theologians(Alba House, New York).Google Scholar
  39. Wicks, A. C., D. R. Gilbert and R. E. Freeman: 1994, ‘A Feminist Reinterpretion of the Stakeholder Concept’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4) (October).Google Scholar
  40. Yepes, R.: 1996, Fundamentos de Antropología. Un ideal de la excelencia humana(Eunsa, Pamplona).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Argandoña

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations