Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 55–84 | Cite as

Effects of windbreaks on airflow, microclimates and crop yields

  • H. A. Cleugh

Abstract

The mechanisms by which a porous windbreak modifies airflow, microclimates and hence crop yields are addressed, based upon recent wind tunnel experiments, field observations and numerical modelling. This paper is thus an update to the excellent reviews in Brandle (1988). It shows how a turbulent mixing layer initiated at the top of the windbreak dominates the airflow behind a windbreak. This mixing layer spreads vertically as it moves downwind, growing at a rate determined by the turbulence in the approach flow and the windbreak's ‘permeability’. The roughness of the terrain and land-cover upwind, windbreak height and porosity are thus the main controls on the amount and extent of shelter provided by a windbreak. The changes in temperature, humidity, heat and evaporation fluxes given these changes in turbulence are then described. Based on the turbulent mixing layer model, the highly sheltered ‘quiet zone’ will be typically warmer and more humid while further downwind in the ‘wake zone’, cooler and drier conditions would be expected. The careful experimental studies needed to verify these theoretical predictions have not yet been published. Shade is also shown to modify the heating in the quiet zone and, depending on the orientation of the windbreak, can offset the warming in the quiet zone. Lastly, the mechanisms affecting plant productivity are described in light of these airflow and microclimate changes. A major effect of a windbreak is to reduce the incidence of low frequency, high magnitude damage events such as sandblasting or lodging. Microclimate effects, however, do not always improve productivity. For example, while shelter may improve water-use efficiency in irrigated crops by increasing yields and reducing water-use, this may not be the case in dryland agriculture.

evaporation turbulence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aase JK and Siddoway FH (1974) Tall wheat grass barriers and winter wheat response. Agric Meteorol 13: 321–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abel N et al. (1997) Agroforestry Design Principles. RIRDC PublicationGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin CS (1988) The influence of field windbreaks on vegetable and specialty crops. Agric Ecosystems Environ 22/23: 191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barker GL, Hatfield JL and Wanjura DF (1989) Influence of wind on cotton growth and yield. Trans ASAE 32: 98–104Google Scholar
  5. Bean A, Alperi RW and Federer CA (1975) A method for categorizing shelterbelt porosity. Agric Meteorol 14: 417–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradley EF and Mulhearn PJ (1983) Development of velocity and shear stress distributions in the wake of a porous shelter fence. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 15: 145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brandle JR and Hintz DL (1988) ‘Windbreak Technology’ eds, Special Issue of Agric Ecosystems Environ 22/23Google Scholar
  8. Brenner AJ, Jarvis PG and van den Beldt RJ (1995) Windbreak – crop interactions in the Sahel. 1. Dependence of shelter on field conditions. Agric For Meteorol 75: 215–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brenner AJ, Jarvis PG and van den Beldt RJ (1995) Windbreak – crop interactions in the Sahel. 2. Growth response of millet in shelter. Agric For Meteorol 75: 235–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brenner AJ (1991) Tree-Crop Interactions within a Sahelian Windbreak System. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown KW and Rosenberg NJ (1970) Effect of windbreaks and soil water potential on stomatal diffusion resistance and photosynthetic rate of sugar beets (Beta vulgaris). Agron Journal 62: 4–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown KW and Rosenberg NJ (1971) Turbulent transport and energy balance as affected by a windbreak in an irrigated suger beet field. Agron Journal 63: 351–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown KW and Rosenberg NJ (1972) Shelter effects on microclimate, growth and water use by irrigated sugar beets in the Great Plains. Agric For Meteorol 9: 241–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caborn JM (1957) Shelterbelts and Microclimate, Forestry Commission Bulletin No. 29Google Scholar
  15. Cleugh HA (1997) The influence of a windbreak on airflow and scalar transport: Part 1: Field measurements, 1997 Joint Assemblies of IAMAS and IAPSO, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  16. Eastham J and Rose CW (1988) Pasture evapotranspiration under varying tree planting density in an agroforestry experiment. Agric Water Management 15: 87–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eastham J, Rose CW and Charles-Edwards DA (1990) Planting density effects on water use efficiency of trees and pasture in an agroforestry experiment. NZ J For Sci 20: 39–53Google Scholar
  18. Grace J and Russell G (1982) The effect of wind and a reduced supply of water on the growth and water relations of Festuca arundinacea. Ann Bot 49: 217–225Google Scholar
  19. Heisler GM and DeWalle DR (1988) Effects of windbreak structure on wind flow. Agric Ecosystems Environ 22/23: 41–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jacobs AFG (1984) Wind reduction near the surface behind a thin solid fence. Agric For Meteorol 33: 157–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Judd MJ and McAneney KJ (1984) Water use by tamarillos (Cyphomandra betacea) within a sheltered orchard environment. Agric For Meteorol 32: 31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Judd MJ, Raupach MR and Finnigan JJ (1996) A wind tunnel study of turbulent flow around single and multiple windbreaks, accepted for publication in Boundary-Layer MeteorolGoogle Scholar
  23. Kohli RK, Singh D and Verma RC (1990) Influence of eucalypt shelterbelt on winter season agroecosystems. Agric Ecosystems Environ 33: 23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kort J (1988) Benefits of windbreaks to field and forage crops. Agric Ecosystems Environ 22/23: 165–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ludlow MH (1978) Light relations of pasture plants. In: Wilson JR (ed) Plant Relations in Pasture, pp 35–50. CSIRO, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  26. Lynch JJ, Elwin RL and Mottershead BE (1980) The influence of artificial windbreaks on loss of soil water from a continuously grazed pasture during a dry period. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 20: 170–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McAneney KJ, Prendergast PT, Judd MJ and Green AE (1992) Observations of equilibrium evaporation from a windbreak-sheltered kiwifruit orchard. Agric For Meteorol 57: 253–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McAneney KJ, Salinger MJ, Porteous AS and Barber RF (1990) Modifications to an orchard climate with increasing shelter height. Agric For Meteorol 50: 211–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McMahon SD (1990) Effects of shelter on the plant and soil water status of a rainfed crop, Unpublished BSc (Hons) Thesis, Macquarie UniversityGoogle Scholar
  30. McNaughton KG (1988) Effects of windbreaks on turbulent transport and microclimate. Agric Ecosystems Environ 22/23: 17–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller DR, Rosenberg NJ and Baglet WT (1973) Soybean water use in the shelter of a slat fence windbreak. Agric Meteorol 11: 405–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Miller JM, Böhm M and Cleugh HA (1995) Direct mechanical effects of wind on selected crops: a review Report to RIRDC (also Technical Report No. 67, CSIRO Centre for Environmental Mechanics, Canberra)Google Scholar
  33. Mulhearn PJ and Bradley EF (1977) Secondary flows in the lee of porous shelterbelts. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 12: 75–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Naegeli W (1946) Weitere untersuchungen über die windverhältnisse im bereich von windschutzanlagen (Further investigations of wind conditions in the range of shelterbelts). Mitt Schweiz Anst Forstl Versuchswesen 24: 660–737Google Scholar
  35. Nord M (1991) Shelter effects of vegetation belts – results of field measurements. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 54: 363–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Norton RL (1988) Windbreaks: benefits to orchard and vineyard crops. Agric Ecosystems Environ 22/23: 205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oke R (1987) Boundary Layer Climates. Routledge, New York, 435 ppGoogle Scholar
  38. Onyewotu LOZ, Ogigirigi MA and Stigter CJ (1994) A study of competitive effects between a Eucalyptus camaldulensis shelterbelt and an adjacent millet (Pennisetum typhoides) crop. Agric Ecosystems Environ 51: 281–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Patton EG, Shaw RH, Judd MJ and Raupach MR (1996) Large eddy simulation of flow around multiple windbreaks in reviewGoogle Scholar
  40. Perera MDAE (1981) Shelter behind two dimensional solid and porous fences. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 8: 93–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Plate EJ (1971) The aerodynamics of shelterbelts. Agric Meteorol 8: 203–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Raine JK and Stevenson DC (1977) Wind protection by model fences in simulated atmospheric boundary layer. J Ind Aerodyn 2: 159–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schroth G and Zech W (1995) Root length dynamics in agroforestry with Gliricidia sepium as compared to sole cropping in the semi-deciduous rainforest zone of West Africa. Plant and Soil 170: 297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schwartz RC, Fryrear DW, Harris BL, Bilbro JD and Juo ASR (1995) Mean flow and shear stress distributions as influenced by vegetative windbreak structure. Agric For Meteorol 75: 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Seginer I and Rosenzweig D (1971) Flow around oriented porous obstructions, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology Publication No. 138. Prepared for USDAGoogle Scholar
  46. Seginer, I. (1975) Atmospheric stability effect on windbreak shelter and drag Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 8, 383–400.Google Scholar
  47. Stigter CJ, Darnhofer T and Herrera SH (1989) Crop protection from very strong winds: recommendations from a Costa Rican agroforestry case study. In: Reifsnyder WR and Darnhofer OT (eds) Meteorology and Agroforestry, pp 521–530. ICRAF, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  48. van Eimern J, Karschon R, Razumova LA and Robertson GW (1964) Windbreaks and shelterbelts WMO Technical Note No. 59 (WMO-No.147.TP.70), 188 ppGoogle Scholar
  49. Wallace JS, Batchelor CH, Dabeesing DN, Teeluck M and Soopramanien GC (1991) A comparison of the light interception and water use of plant and first ratoon sugar cane intercropped with maize. Agric For Meteorol 57: 85–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang, H and Klaasen W (1995) The surface layer above a landscape with a rectangular windbreak pattern. Agric For Meteorol 72: 195–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang H and Takle ES (1995) A numerical simulation of boundary layer flows near shelterbelts. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 75: 141–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang H and Takle ES (1996) On three-dimensionality of shelterbelt structure and its influences on shelter effects. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 79: 83–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang H and Takle ES (1997) Momentum budget and shelter mechanism of boundary layer flow near a shelterbelt. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 82: 417–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wilson J (1985) Numerical studies of flow through a windbreak. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 21: 119–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilson JD (1987) On the choice of a windbreak porosity profile. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 38: 37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Woodruff NP and Zingg AW (1953) Wind tunnel studies of shelterbelt models. J For 53: 173–178Google Scholar
  57. Zhuang Y and Wilson JD (1994) Coherent motions in windbreak flow. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 70: 151–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. A. Cleugh
    • 1
  1. 1.Pye LaboratoryCSIRO Land and WaterCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations