Biogeochemistry

, Volume 40, Issue 2–3, pp 175–187

Temperature, growth and dietary effects on fish mercury dynamics in two Ontario lakes

  • Reed C. Harris
  • R.A. (Drew) Bodaly
Article
  • 408 Downloads

Abstract

A bioenergetics-based model was used to investigate the effects of temperature, growth and dietary exposure on methylmercury dynamics in walleye (Stizostedion vitreum) and yellow perch (Perca flavescens) from two lakes sampled in northwestern Ontario. Orange Lake was smaller, warmer, had slower fish growth and higher mercury concentrations in yearling yellow perch and walleye (three fold difference in 40 cm walleye) than Trout Lake. The model was applied to test the hypothesis that higher water temperatures in Orange Lake increased metabolic needs, food consumption and mercury uptake in fish. The effects of different growths rates in the lakes were also considered. Temperature/metabolic effects and growth effects on internal methylmercury dynamics in walleye and perch were predicted to occur but be of secondary importance. Different dietary exposure to methylmercury was likely the dominant source of variation in fish mercury concentrations between the two lakes.

bioenergetics fish mercury methylmercury models 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bodaly RA, Rudd JWM, Fudge RJP & Kelly CA (1993) Mercury concentrations in fish related to size of remote Canadian Shield lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50: 980–987Google Scholar
  2. Fagerstrom T, Asell B & Jernelov A (1974) Model for accumulation of methylmercury in Northern Pike (Esox lucius). OIKOS 26: 109–116Google Scholar
  3. Fagerstrom T & Asell B (1973) Methyl mercury accumulation in an aquatic food chain – A model and some implications for research planning. Ambio 2(5): 64–171Google Scholar
  4. Fudge RJP, Bodaly RA & Strange NE (1994) Lake variability and climate change study: Fisheries investigations from the Northwestern Ontario Lake Size Series (NOLSS) Lakes, 1987–1989. Can. Data Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 921: v + 96Google Scholar
  5. Goldstein RM, Brigham ME & Stauffer JC (1996) Comparison of mercury concentrations in liver, muscle, whole bodies, and composites of fish from the Red River of the North. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53: 244–252Google Scholar
  6. Hall BD, Bodaly RA, Fudge RJP, Rudd JWM & Rosenberg DM (in press) Food as the dominant pathway of methylmercury uptake by fish. Water, Air, and Soil PollutionGoogle Scholar
  7. Harris RC & Watras CJ (1996) Standardizing Fish Mercury Concentrations by age, Length or Weight: Bioenergetic Predictions of the Effects of Growth Rate. Abstract from Fourth International Conference on Mercury as a Global Pollutant, August 4–8. Hamburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  8. Harris RC, Gherini SA, Hudson RJM, Watras CJ & Porcella DB (1996) Application of the Regional Mercury Cycling Model (R-MCM) to 23 MAPP Lakes in Wisconsin. Abstract from presentation at International Conference on Mercury, August. Hamburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  9. Harris RC & Snodgrass WJ (1993) Bioenergetic simulations of mercury uptake and retention in walleye (Stizostedion vitreum) and yellow perch (Perca flavescens). Water Pollution Research Journal of Canada. 28(1): 217–236Google Scholar
  10. Hewett SW & Johnson BL (1992) Fish Bioenergetics Model 2. Published by the University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute (WIS-SG-91-250)Google Scholar
  11. Korhonen P, Virtanen M & Schultz T (1995) Bioenergetic calculation of mercury accumulation in fish. Water Air Soil Poll. 80: 901–904Google Scholar
  12. Norstrom RJ, McKinnon AE & DeFreitas ASW (1976) A bioenergetics-based model for pollutant accumulation by fish – Simulation of PCB and methylmercury residue levels in Ottawa River yellow perch. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 33: 248–267Google Scholar
  13. Rodgers DW (1996) Methylmercury accumulation by reservoir fish: Bioenergetic and trophic effects. In: Miranda LE & DeVries DR (Eds) Multidimensional Approaches to Reservoir Fisheries Management (pp 107–118). American Fisheries Society Symposium 16, Bethesda, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  14. Rodgers DW (1994) You are what you eat and a little bit more: Bioenergetics-based models of methylmercury accumulation in fish revisited. In: Watras CJ & Huckabee JW (Eds) Mercury as a Global Pollutant (pp 427–439). Lewis PublishersGoogle Scholar
  15. Rodgers DW & Beamish FWH (1982) Dynamics of dietary methylmercury in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). Aquatic Toxicology 2: 271–290Google Scholar
  16. Tetra Tech Inc. (1996) Mercury Accumulation Pathways and Processes (MAPP) Synthesis Document. Prepared for Electric Power Research Institute, May 1996 (Draft)Google Scholar
  17. Tetra Tech Inc. (1994) A Study to Model Mercury Dynamics in Finescale Dace Sampled During 1991–93 at the Experimental Lakes Area, Ontario. Prepared for the Canadian Department of Fisheries and OceansGoogle Scholar
  18. Watras CJ, Morrison KA, Host J & Bloom NS (1995) Concentration of mercury species in relationship to other site-specific factors in the surface waters of Northern Wisconsin lakes. Limnol. Oceangr. 40: 556–565Google Scholar
  19. Wiener JG & Spry DJ (1996) Toxicological significance of mercury in freshwater fish. In: Beyer W, Heinz G & Redmon-Norwood A (Eds) Environmental Contaminants in Wildlife: Interpreting Tissue Concentrations (pp 297–339). Special Publication of the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Lewis PublishersGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reed C. Harris
  • R.A. (Drew) Bodaly

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations