Advertisement

Photosynthesis Research

, Volume 54, Issue 2, pp 135–142 | Cite as

Resolving chlorophyll a fluorescence images of photosynthetic efficiency into photochemical and non-photochemical components – calculation of qP and Fv-/Fm-; without measuring Fo-;

  • Kevin Oxborough
  • Neil R. Baker
Article

Abstract

Imaging of chlorophyll a fluorescence from leaves has enabled the spatial resolution of the fluorescence parameter, ΔF/Fm-;. Although this parameter provides a reliable estimate of photosynthetic efficiency under most conditions, the extent to which this efficiency is defined by (i) competition with other energy-dissipating processes operating at photosystem II and (ii) by processes on the reducing side of photosystem II, such as carbon assimilation, requires the use of additional parameters. Of particular value are qP, which quantifies the photochemical capacity of photosystem II, and Fv-;/Fm-;, which quantifies the extent to which photochemistry at photosystem II is limited by competition with thermal decay processes. Imaging of both qP and Fv-;/Fm-; requires measurement of Fo-; (the minimum fluorescence yield in the light-adapted state), which cannot be imaged with existing systems. In this paper, a method is described which estimates Fo-; through a simple equation involving the minimum fluorescence yield in the dark-adapted state (Fo), the maximum fluorescence yield in the dark-adapted state (Fm), and the maximum fluorescence yield in the light-adapted state (Fm-;). This method is tested here, through comparison of measured and calculated values of Fo-;. An example of the application of this method to analysis of photosynthetic performance in leaves, from images of chlorophyll a fluorescence, is also presented.

fluorescence imaging non-photochemical quenching photochemical quenching 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bradbury M and Baker NR (1984) A quantitative determination of photochemical and non-photochemical quenching during the slow phase of the chlorophyll fluorescence induction curve of bean leaves. Biochim Biophys Acta 765: 275-281Google Scholar
  2. Bradbury M and Baker NR (1986) The kinetics of photoinhibition of the photosynthetic apparatus in pea chloroplasts. Plant Cell Environ 9: 298-297Google Scholar
  3. Briantais J-M, Vernotte C Picaud M and Krause GH (1979) A quantitative study of the slow decline of chlorophyll afluorescence in isolated chloroplasts. Biochim Biophys Acta 548: 128-138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Butler WL and Kitajima M (1975) Fluorescence quenching in photosystem II of chloroplasts. Biochim Biophys Acta 376: 116-125PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Di Marco G, Manes FS, Tricoli D and Vitale E (1990) Fluorescence parameters measured concurrently with net photosynthesis to investigate chloroplastic CO2concentration in leaves of Quercus silexL. J Plant Physiol 136: 538-543Google Scholar
  6. Edwards GE, Baker NR (1993) Can CO2assimilation in maize leaves be predicted accurately from chlorophyll fluorescence analysis?. Photosynth Res 37: 89-102Google Scholar
  7. Fryer MJ, Oxborough K, Martin B, Ort DR and Baker NR (1995) Factors associated with depression of photosynthetic quantum efficiency in maize at low growth temperature. Plant Physiol 108: 761-767PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Genty B, Briantais JM and Baker NR (1989) The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim Biophys Acta 990: 87-92.Google Scholar
  9. Genty B, Harbinson J, Briantais JM and Baker NR (1990) The relationship between nonphotochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence and the rate of photosystem 2 photochemistry in leaves. Photosynth Res 25: 249-257Google Scholar
  10. Horton P and Ruban AV (1993) ΔpH-dependent quenching of the Fo level of chlorophyll fluorescence in spinach leaves. Biochim Biophys Acta 1142: 203-206Google Scholar
  11. Keiller DR and Walker DA (1990) The use of chlorophyll fluorescence to predict CO2 fixation during photosynthetic oscillations. Proc R Soc London B 241: 59-64Google Scholar
  12. Kitajima M. and Butler WL (1974) Quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence and primary photochemistry in chloroplasts by dibro-mothymoquinone. Biochim Biophys Acta 376: 105-115Google Scholar
  13. Krall JP and Edwards GE (1990) Quantum yields of photosystem II electron transport and carbon dioxide fixation in C4plants. Aust J Plant Physiol 17: 579-588Google Scholar
  14. Krause GH, Vernotte C and Briantais J-M (1982) Photo-induced quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence in intact chloroplasts and algae. Resolution into two components. Biochim Biophys Acta 679: 116-124Google Scholar
  15. Lavergne J and Trissl HW (1995) Theory of fluorescence induction in photosystem-II—derivation of analytical expressions in a model including exciton-radical-pair equilibrium and restricted energy-transfer between photosynthetic units. Biophys J 68: 2474-2492PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Oxborough K and Baker NR (1997) An instrument capable of imaging chlorophyll a fluorescence from intact leaves at very low irradiance and at the cellular and sub-cellular levels of organisation. Plant Cell Environ (in press)Google Scholar
  17. Peterson RB, Sivak MN and Walker DA (1988) Carbon dioxide-induced oscillations in fluorescence and photosynthesis — role of thylakoid membrane energization in regulation of Photosystem-II activity. Plant Physiol 88: 1125-1130Google Scholar
  18. Quick WP and Horton P (1984) Studies on the induction of chlorophyll fluorescence in barley protoplasts. II Resolution of fluorescence quenching by redox state and the transthylakoid pH gradient. Proc R Soc London B 220: 371-382Google Scholar
  19. Rees D, Noctor GD and Horton P (1990) The effect of high-energy-state excitation quenching on maximum and dark level chlorophyll fluorescence yield. Photosynth Res 25: 199-211Google Scholar
  20. Siebke K and Weis E (1995a) Imaging of chlorophyll a fluorescence in leaves — topography of photosynthetic oscillations in leaves of Glechoma hederacea. Photosynth Res 45: 225-237Google Scholar
  21. Siebke K and Weis E (1995b) Assimilation images of leaves of Glechoma hederacea:Analysis of non-synchronous stomata related oscillations. Planta 196: 155-165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Scholes JD and Rolfe SA (1996) Photosynthesis in localised regions of oat leaves infected with crown rust (Puccinia-coronata) — quantitative imaging of chlorophyll fluorescence. Planta 199: 573-582Google Scholar
  23. Van Kooten O and Snel JFH (1990) The use of chlorophyll fluorescence nomenclature in plant stress physiology. Photosynth Res 25, 147-150Google Scholar
  24. Wraight CA and Crofts AR (1970) Energy-dependent quenching of chlorophyll afluorescence in isolated chloroplasts. Eur J Biochem 17: 319-327PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin Oxborough
    • 1
  • Neil R. Baker
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological Sciences, John Tabor LaboratoriesUniversity of EssexColchesterUK

Personalised recommendations