, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 1–22 | Cite as

Diel methane emission patterns from Scirpus lacustris and Phragmites australis

  • Frans-Faco W.A. Van Der Nat
  • Jack J. Middelburg*
  • Daniëlle Van Meteren
  • Annette Wielemakers


In mature Phragmites australis and Scirpus lacustris vegetated sediment methane was emitted almost exclusively by plant-mediated transport, whereas in unvegetated, but otherwise identical sediment, methane was emitted almost exclusively by ebullition. Diel variations in methane emission, with highest emission rates at daytime and emission peaks following sunrise, were demonstrated for Phragmites and Scirpus. The diel difference and magnitude of the emission peaks were much smaller for Scirpus than for Phragmites. In contrast to Phragmites, methane concentrations within Scirpus stems did not change significantly over the diel period. These patterns are consistent with a two-way transport mechanism for Phragmites (convective at daytime and diffusive at night-time) and an all day diffusive mechanism for Scirpus. The patterns could not be accounted for by diel variation in air and sediment temperature, plant transpiration, or photosynthetically coupled methane production. Comparison of the experimentally derived ratio of methane emission in helium and nitrogen under light and dark conditions with the theoretical derived ratio (calculated according to the kinetic theory of gases) confirmed the exploitation of the different transport mechanism for Phragmites and Scirpus. Methane emission from Phragmites correlated significantly with incident light, which probably drove the pressure differential associated with thermally induced convection. Decrease of the radial resistance of Scirpus stems for methane transport under light compared to dark conditions, in combination with morphological characteristics of the plant species, suggested that stomatal aperture, regulated by light, controls methane emission from Scirpus. Diel variation in bubble emission from the non-vegetated sediment coincided with sediment temperature changes. The results have important implications for sampling and scaling strategies for estimating methane emission from wetlands.

methane emission plant mediated methane transport Phragmites australis Scirpus lacustris 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Armstrong J & Armstrong W (1990) Light-enhanced convective throughflow increases oxygenation in rhizomes and rhizosphere of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. New Phytol. 114: 121–128Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong J & Armstrong W (1991) A convective through-flow of gases in Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. Aquat. Bot. 39: 75–88Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong J, Armstrong W & Beckett PM (1992) Phragmites australis: Venturi-and humidity-induced pressure flows enhance rhizome aeration and rhizosphere oxidation. New Phytol. 120: 197–207Google Scholar
  4. Aselman I & Crutzen PJ (1989) Global distribution of natural freshwater wetlands and rice paddies, their net primary productivity, seasonality and possible methane emissions. J. Atmos. Chem. 8: 307–358Google Scholar
  5. Bendix M, Tornbjerg T & Brix H (1994) Internal gas transport in Typha latifolia L and Typha angustifolia L. 1. Humidity-induced pressurisation and convective throughflow. Aquat. Bot. 49: 75–89Google Scholar
  6. Brix H, Sorrell BK & Orr PT (1992) Internal pressurisation and convective gas flow in some emergent freshwater macrophytes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 37: 1420–1433Google Scholar
  7. Brix H, Sorrell BK & Schierup H (1996) Gas fluxes achieved by in situ convective flow in Phragmites australis. Aquat. Bot. 54: 151–163Google Scholar
  8. Chanton JP & Dacey JWH (1991) Effects of vegetation on methane flux, reservoirs, and carbon isotopic composition. In: Sharkey T, Holland E & Mooney H (Eds) Trace Gas Emissions by Plants (pp 65–92). Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  9. Chanton JP & Whiting GJ (1996) Methane stable isotopic distributions as indicators of gas transport mechanisms in emergent aquatic plants. Aquat. Bot. 54: 227–236Google Scholar
  10. Chanton JP, Whiting GJ, Showres WJ & Crill PM (1992) Methane flux from Peltandra virginica: Stable isotope tracing and chamber effects. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 6: 15–31Google Scholar
  11. Chanton JP, Whiting GJ, Happell JD & Gerard G (1993) Contrasting rates and diurnal patterns of methane emission from emergent macrophytes. Aquat. Bot. 46: 111–128Google Scholar
  12. Chanton JP, Bauer JE, Glaser PA, et al. (1995) Radiocarbon evidence for the substrates supporting methane formation within northern Minnesota peatlands. Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac. 59: 3663–3668Google Scholar
  13. Chanton JP, Whiting GJ, Blair NE, Lindau CW & Bollich PK (1997) Methane emission from rice: Stable isotopes, diurnal variations, and CO2 exchange. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 11: 15–27Google Scholar
  14. Conrad R (1989) Control of methane production in terrestrial ecosystems. In: Andrea MO & Schimmel DS (Eds) Exchange of Trace Gases Between Terrestrial Ecosystems and the Atmosphere (pp 39–58). John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Dacey JWH & Klug MJ (1979) Methane emission from lake sediment through water lelies. Science 203: 1253–1255Google Scholar
  16. Denier van der Gon HAC & Breemen van N (1993) Diffusion-controlled transport of methane from soil to atmosphere as mediated by rice plants. Biogeochemistry 21: 177–190Google Scholar
  17. Denier van der Gon HAC & Neue HU (1996) Oxidation of methane in the rhizosphere of rice plants. Biol. Fertil. Soils 22: 359–66Google Scholar
  18. Fechner-Levy EJ & Hemond HF (1996) Trapped methane volume and potential effects on methane ebullition in a northern peatland. Limnol. & Oceanogr. 41(7): 1375–1383Google Scholar
  19. Frenzel P, Rothfuss F & Conrad R (1992) Oxygen profiles and methane turnover in a flooded rice microcosm. Biol. Fertil. Soils 14: 84–89Google Scholar
  20. Frye JP, Mills AL & Odum WE (1994) Methane flux in Peltandra virginica (Araceae) wetlands – Comparison of field data with a mathematical model. American Journal of Botany 81: 407–413Google Scholar
  21. Gerard G & Chanton J (1993) Quantification of methane oxidation in the rhizosphere of emergent aquatic macrophytes – Defining upper limits. Biogeochemistry 23: 79–97Google Scholar
  22. Grosse W, Buchel HB & Tiebel H (1991) Pressurised ventilation in wetland plants. Aquat. Bot. 39: 89–98Google Scholar
  23. Harden HS & Chanton JP (1994) Locus of Methane Release and Mass-Dependent Fractionation from two Wetland Macrophytes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 39: 148–154Google Scholar
  24. Hirschfelder JO, Curtiss CF & Bird RB (1964) Transport phenomena of dilute gases. In: Molecular Theory of Gases and Liquids (pp 514–543). John Wiley & sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Knapp AK & Yavitt JB (1992) Evaluation of a closed-chamber method for estimating methane emissions from aquatic plants. Tellus 44B: 63–71Google Scholar
  26. Koncalová H, Pokorný J & Kvét, J (1988) Root ventilation in Carex gracilis curt.: Diffusion or mass flow? Aquat. Bot. 30: 149–155Google Scholar
  27. Leffelaar PA (1987) Dynamic simulation of multinary diffusion problems related to soils. Soil Science 143: 43–55Google Scholar
  28. Mevi-Schutz J & Grosse W (1988) A two-way gas transport system in Nelumbo nucifera. Plant Cell and Environment 11: 27–35Google Scholar
  29. Mikkela C, Sundh I, Svensson BH & Nilsson M (1995) Diurnal variation in methane emission in relation to the water table, soil temperature, climate and vegetation cover in a Swedish acid mire. Biogeochemistry 28: 93–114Google Scholar
  30. Minoda T & Kimura M (1994) Contribution of photosynthesised carbon to the methane emitted from paddy fields. Geophys. Res. Lett. 21: 2007–2010Google Scholar
  31. Morrissey LA, Zobel DB & Livingston GP (1993) Significance of stomatal control on methane release from Carex-dominated wetlands. Chemosphere 26: 339–355Google Scholar
  32. Nouchi I, Mariko S & Aoki K (1990) Mechanism of methane transport from the rhizosphere to the atmosphere through rice plants. Plant Physiology 94: 59–66Google Scholar
  33. Schütz H, Holzapfel-Pschorn A, Conrad R, Rennenberg H & Seiler W (1989a) A 3-year continuous record on the influence of daytime, season, and fertiliser treatment on methane emission rates from an Italian rice paddy. J. Geophys. Res. 94: 16,405–16,416Google Scholar
  34. Schütz H, Seiler W & Conrad R (1989b) Processes involved in formation and emission of methane in rice paddies. Biogeochemistry 7: 33–53Google Scholar
  35. Schütz H, Schröder P & Rennenberg H (1991) Role of plants in regulating the methane flux to the atmosphere. In: Sharkey T, Holland E & Mooney H (Eds) Trace Gas Emissions by Plants (pp 29–63). Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  36. Sebacher D, Harriss RC & Bartlett KB (1985) Methane emissions to the atmosphere through aquatic plants. J. Environ. Qual. 14: 40–46Google Scholar
  37. Seiler WA, Holzapfel-Pschorn A, Conrad R & Scharffe D (1984) Methane emission from rice paddies. J. Atmos. Chem. 1: 241–268Google Scholar
  38. Shannon RD, White JR, Lawson JE & Gilmour BS (1996) Methane efflux from emergent vegetation in peatlands. J. Ecol. 84: 239–246Google Scholar
  39. Sorrell BK & Boon PI (1994) Convective gas flow in Eleocharis sphacelata R. Br.: methane transport and release from wetlands. Aquat. Bot. 47: 197–212Google Scholar
  40. van der Nat FJWA & Middelburg JJ (1998) Seasonal variation of methane oxidation in the rhizosphere of Phragmites australis and Scirpus lacustris: A mesocosm study Aquatic Botany (submitted)Google Scholar
  41. Whiting GJ & Chanton JP (1993) Primary production control of methane emission from wetlands. Nature 364: 794–795Google Scholar
  42. Whiting GJ & Chanton JP (1996) Control of the diurnal pattern of methane emission from emergent aquatic macrophytes by gas transport mechanism. Aquat. Bot. 54: 237–253Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frans-Faco W.A. Van Der Nat
    • 1
  • Jack J. Middelburg*
    • 1
  • Daniëlle Van Meteren
    • 1
  • Annette Wielemakers
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Estuarine and Coastal EcologyNetherlands Institute of EcologyAC YersekeThe Netherlands (*Corresponding author)

Personalised recommendations