Advertisement

Plant Molecular Biology

, Volume 35, Issue 1–2, pp 205–218 | Cite as

Transformation of rice mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens

  • Yukoh Hiei
  • Toshihiko Komari
  • Tomoaki Kubo
Article

Abstract

Agrobacterium tumefaciens has been routinely utilized in gene transfer to dicotyledonous plants, but monocotyledonous plants including important cereals were thought to be recalcitrant to this technology as they were outside the host range of crown gall. Various challenges to infect monocotyledons including rice with Agrobacterium had been made in many laboratories, but the results were not conclusive until recently. Efficient transformation protocols mediated by Agrobacterium were reported for rice in 1994 and 1996. A key point in the protocols was the fact that tissues consisting of actively dividing, embryonic cells, such as immature embryos and calli induced from scutella, were co-cultivated with Agrobacterium in the presence of acetosyringonc, which is a potent inducer of the virulence genes. It is now clear that Agrobacterium is capable of transferring DNA to monocotyledons if tissues containing ‘competent’ cells are infected. The studies of transformation of rice suggested that numerous factors including genotype of plants, types and ages of tissues inoculated, kind of vectors, strains of Agrobacterium, selection marker genes and selective agents, and various conditions of tissue culture, are of critical importance. Advantages of the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in rice, like on dicotyledons, include the transfer of pieces of DNA with defined ends with minimal rearrangements, the transfer of relatively large segments of DNA, the integration of small numbers of copies of genes into plant chromosomes, and high quality and fertility of transgenic plants. Delivery of foreign DNA to rice plants via A. tumefaciens is a routine technique in a growing number of laboratories. This technique will allow the genetic improvement of diverse varieties of rice, as well as studies of many aspects of the molecular biology of rice.

Agrobacterium tumefaciens rice transformation monocotyledons 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abdullah R, Thompson J, Khush GS, Kaushik RP, Cocking EC: Protoclonal variation in the seed progeny of plants regenerated from rice protoplasts. Plant Sci 65: 97–101 (1989).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aldemita RR, Hodges TK: Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation of japonica and indica rice varieties. Planta 199: 612–617 (1996).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Allen GC, Hall GE, Childs LC, Weissinger AK, Spiker S, Thompson WF: Scaffold attachment regions increase reporter gene expression in stably transformed plant cells. Plant Cell 5: 603–613 (1993).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alt-Moerbe J, Neddermann P, Von Lintig J, Weiler EW, Schröder J: Temperature-sensitive step in Ti plasmid vir region induction and correlation with cytokinin secretion by Agrobacteria.Mol Gen Genet 213: 1–8 (1988).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alt-Mörbe J, Külhmann H, Schröder J: Differences in induction of Ti-plasmid virulence genes virG and virD and continued control of virD expression by four external factors. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 2: 301–308 (1989).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    An G: High efficiency of transformation of cultured tobacco cells. Plant Physiol 79: 568–570 (1985).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    An G, Evert PR, Mitra A, Ha SB: Binary vectors. In: Gelvin SB, Schilperoort RA (eds) Plant Molecular Biology Manual A3, pp. 1–19. Academic Press, Dordrecht (1988).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ayres NM, Park WD: Genetic transformation of rice. Critical Rev Plant Sci 13: 219–239 (1994).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barker RF, Idler KB, Thompson DV, Kemp JD: Nucleotide sequence of the T-DNAregion from the Agrobacterium tumefaciens octopine Ti plasmid pTi15955. Plant Mol Biol 2: 335–350 (1983).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bevan MW: Binary Agrobacterium vectors for plant transformation. Nucleic Acids Res 12: 8711–8721 (1984).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Binns AN, Thomashow MF: Cell biology of Agrobacterium infection and transformation of plants. Ann Rev Microbiol 42: 575–606 (1988).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bolton GW, Nester EW, Gordon MP: Plant phenolic compounds induce expression of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens loci needed for virulence. Science 232: 983–984 (1986).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Budar F, Thia-Toong S, van Montagu M, Hernalsteens JP: Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer results mainly in transgenic plants transmitting T-DNA as a single Mendelian factor. Genetics 114: 303–313 (1986).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bytebier B, Deboeck F, Greve HD, van Montagu M, Hemalsteens JP: T-DNA organization in tumor cultures and transgenic plants of the monocotyledon Asparagus officinalis.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 5345–5349 (1987).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cangelosi GA, Ankenbauer RG, Nester EW: Sugars induce the Agrobacterium virulence genes through a periplasmic binding protein and transmembrane signal protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 6708–6712 (1990).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cao J, Duan X, McElroy D, Wu R: Regeneration of herbicide-resistant transgenic rice plants following microprojectilemediated transformation of suspension culture cells. Plant Cell Rep 11: 586–591 (1992).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Casse F, Boucher C, Julliot JS, Michel M, Dénarié J: Identification and characterization of large plasmids in Rhizobium meliloti using agarose gel electrophoresis. J Gen Microbiol 113: 229–242 (1979).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chan M-T, Chang H-H, Ho S-L, Tong W-F, Yu S-M: Agrobacterium-mediated production of transgenic rice plants expressing a chimeric α-amylase promoter/β-glucuronidase gene. Plant Mol Biol 22: 491–506 (1993).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chan M-T, Lee T-M, Chang H-H: Transformation of indica rice (Oryza sativaL.) mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens.Plant Cell Physiol 33: 577–583 (1992).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Christou P, Ford TL, Kofron M: Production of transgenic rice (Oryza sativaL.) from agronomically important indica and japonica varieties via electric discharge particle acceleration of exogenous DNA into immature zygotic embryos. Bio/technology 9: 957–962 (1991).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Christou P, Ford TL, Kofron M: The development of a variety independent gene-transfer method for rice. TIBTECH 10: 239–246 (1992).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Christou P, Swain WF, Yang N-S, McCabe DF: Inheritance and expression of foreign genes in transgenic soybean plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci 86: 7500–7504 (1989).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Datta SK, Datta K, Soltanifer N, Donn G, Potrykus I: Herbicide-resistant Indica rice plants from IRRI breeding line IR72 after PEG-mediated transformation of protoplasts. Plant Mol Biol 20: 619–627 (1992).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Datta SK, Peterhans A, Datta K, Potrykus I: Genetically engineered fertile indica-rice recovered from protoplasts. Bio/technology 8: 736–740 (1990).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    De Cleene M, De Ley J: The host range of crown gall. Bot Rev 42: 389–466 (1976).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    De Greve H, Decraemer H, Seurinck J, van Montagu M, Schell J: The functional organization of the octopine Agrobacterium tumefaciens plasmid pTiB6S3. Plasmid 6: 235-248 (1981).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dong J, Teng W, Buchholz WG, Hall TC: Agrobacterium mediated transformation of Javanica rice. Molecular Breeding 2: 267–276 (1996).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Feldmann KA and Marks MD: Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of germinating seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana: a non-tissue culture approach. Mol Gen Genet 208: 1–9 (1987).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Finnegan J, MacElroy D: Transgenic inactivation: plants fight back! Bio/technology 12: 883–888 (1994).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fraley RT, Rogers SG, Horsh RB, Eicholtz DA, Flick JS: The SEV system: a new disarmed Ti plasmid vector for plant transformation. Bio/technology 3: 629–635 (1985).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fraley RT, Rogers SG, Horsh RB: Genetic transformation in higher plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci 4: l–46 (1986).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fravell RB: Inactivation of gene expression in plants as consequence of specific sequence duplication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 3490–3496 (1994).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fromm ME, Taylor LP, Walbot V: Expression of genes transferred into monocot and dicot plant cells by electroporation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 882: 5824–5828 (1985).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Garfinkel D, Simpson R, Ream L, White F, Gordon M, Nester E: Genetic analysis of crown gal: fine structure map of the TDNA by site-directed mutagenesis. Cell 27: 143–153 (1980).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ghosh Biswas GC, Burkhardt PK, Wünn J, Klöti A, Potrykus I: Fertile Indica rice plants regenerated from protoplasts isolated from scutellar tissue of immature embryos. Plant Cell Rep 13: 528–532 (1994).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Glaszmann JC: Isozymes and classification ofAsian rice varieties. Theor Appl Genet 74: 21–30 (1987).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Graves AE, Goldman SL: The transformation of Zea mays seedlings with Agrobacterium tumefaciens.Plant Mol Biol (1986).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Graves ACF, Goldman SL: Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation of the monocot genus Gladiolus: detection of expression of T-DNA-encoded genes. J Bacteriol 169: 1745–1746 (1987).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Grimsley NH, Ramos C, Hein T, Hohn B: Meristematic tissues of maize plants are most susceptible to Agroinfection with maize streak virus. Bio/technology 6: 185–189 (1988).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Grimsley N, Hohn B, Hohn T, Walden R: ‘Agroinfection’ an alternative route for viral infection of plants by using the Ti plasmid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 3282–3286 (1986).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Grimsley N, Hohn T, Davis JW, Hohn B: Agrobacterium mediated delivery of infectious maize streak virus into maize plants. Nature 325: 177–179 (1987).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Guyon P, Chilton M-D, Petit A, Tempe J: Agropine in ‘nulltype’ crown gall tumors: evidence for generality of the opine concept. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77: 2693–2697 (1980).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hamilton CM, Frary A, Lewis C, Tanksley SD: Stable transfer of intact high molecular weight DNA into plant chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 9975–9979 (1996).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hauptmann RM, Ozias-Akins P, Vasil V, Tabaeizadeh Z, Rogers SG, Horsch RB, Vasil IK, Fraley RT: Transient expression of electroporated DNA inmonocotyledonous and dicotyledonous species. Plant Cell Rep 6: 265–270 (1987).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hayashimoto A, Li Z, Murai N: A polyethylene glycol-mediated protoplast transformation system for production of fertile transgenic rice plants. Plant Physiol 93: 857–863 (1990).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hernalsteens J-P, Thia-Toong L, Schell J, van Montagu M: An Agrobacterium-transformed cell culture from themonocot Asparagus officinalis.EMBO J 13: 3039–3041 (1984).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hiei Y, Komari T: Stable inheritance of transgenes in rice plants transformed by Agrobacterium tumefaciens.Third International Rice Genetics Symposium, October 16 to 20, Manila, Philippines (1995).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komari T, Kumashiro T: Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativaL.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J 6: 271–282 (1994).Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hoekema A, Hirsch PR, Hooykaas PJJ, Schilperoort RA: A binary plant vector strategy based on separation of vir-and T-region of Agrobacterium tumefaciensTi-plasmid. Nature 303: 179–180 (1983).Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hohn B, Koukolikova-Nicla Z, Bakkeren G, Grimsley N: Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer to monocots and dicots. Genome 31: 987–991 (1989).Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hood EE, Fraley RT, Chilton M-D: Virulence of Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain A281 on legumes. Plant Physiol 83: 529–534 (1987).Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hood EE, Helmer GL, Fraley RT, Chilton M-D: The hypervirulence of Agrobacterium tumefaciensA281 is encoded in a region of pTiBo542 outside of T-DNA. J Bacteriol 168: 1291–1301 (1986).Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hood EE, Jen G, Kayes L, Kramer J, Fraley RT, Chilton M-D: Restriction endonuclease map of pTiBo542, a potential Ti-plasmid vector for genetic engineering of plants. Bio/technology 2: 702–709 (1984).Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hooykaas PJJ, Beijersbergen AGM: The virulence system of Agrobacterium tumefaciens.Ann Rev Phytopathol 32: 157–179 (1994).Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hooykaas PJJ, Schilperoort RA: Agrobacterium and plant engineering. Plant Mol Biol 19: 15–38 (1992).Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hooykaas-van Slogteren GMS, Hooykaas PJJ, Schilperoort: Expression of Ti plasmid genes in monocotyledonous plants infected with Agrobacterium tumefaciens.Nature 311: 763–764 (1984).Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Iida A, Yamashita Y, Yamada Y, Morikawa H: Efficiency of particle-bombardment-mediated transformation is influenced by cell stage in synchronized cultured cells of tobacco. Plant Physiol 97: 1585–1587 (1991).Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ishida Y, Saito H, Ohta S, Hiei Y, Komari T, Kumashiro T: High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea maysL.) mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens.Nature Biotechnology 14: 745-750 (1996).Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Janssen BJ, Gardner RC: Localized transient expression of GUS in leaf discs following cocultivation with Agrobacterium.Plant Mol Biol 14: 61–72 (1989).Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Jian RK, Jian S, Wang B, Wu R: Optimization of biolistic method for transient gene expression and production of agronomically useful transgenic Basmati rice plants. Plant Cell Rep 15: 963–968 (1996).Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kahl G: Molecular biology of wound healing: the conditioning phenomenon. In: Kahl G, Schell J (eds) Molecular Biology of Plant Tumors, pp. 211–267. Academic Press, New York (1982).Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Kibly NJ, Ottoline Leyser HM, Furner IJ: Promoter methylation and progressive transgenic inactivation in Arabidopsis.Plant Mol Biol 20: 103–112 (1992).Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Klee HJ, Horsh R, Rogers S: Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation and its further applications to plant biology. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 38: 467–486 (1987).Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Klee HJ, White FF, Iyer VN, Gordon MP, Nester EW: Mutational analysis of the virulence region of an Agrobacterium tumefaciensTi plasmid. J Bacteriol 153: 878–883 (1983).Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Knauf V, Yanofsky M, Montoya A, Nester E: Physical and functional map of an Agrobacterium tumefaciens tumorinducing plasmid that confers a narrow host range. J Bacteriol 160: 564–568 (1984).Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Kohli A, Ghareyazie B, Kim HS, Kush GS, Bennett J: Cytosine methylation implicated in silencing of β-glucuronidase genes in transgenic rice. Third International Rice Genetics Symposium, October 16 to 20, Manila, Philippines (1995).Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Komari T: Transformation of callus cultures of nine plant species mediated by Agrobacterium.Plant Sci 60: 223–229 (1989).Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Komari T: Transformation of cultured cells of Chenopodium quinoa by binary vectors that carry a fragment of DNA from the virulence region of pTiBo542. Plant Cell Rep 9: 303–306 (1990).Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Komari T, Halperin W, Nester EW: Physical and functional map of supervirulent Agrobacterium tumefaciens tumorinducing plasmid pTiBo542. J Bacteriol 166: 88–94 (1986).Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Komari T, Hiei Y, Saito Y, Murai N, Kumashiro T: Vectors carrying two separate T-DNA for co-transformation of higher plants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers. Plant J 10: 165–174 (1996).Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Kudirka DT, Colburn SM, Hinchee MA, Wright MS: Interactions of Agrobacterium tumefaciens with soybean (Glycine maxL. Merr.) leaf explants in tissue cultures. Can J Genet Cytol 28: 808–817 (1986).Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Li L, Rongda Q, Kochko A, Fauquet C, Beachy RN: An improved rice transformation system using the biolistic method. Plant Cell Rep 12: 250–255 (1993).Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Li Z, Burow MD, Murai N: High frequency generation of fertile transgenic rice plants after PEG-mediated protoplast transformation. Plant Mol Biol Rep 8: 276–291 (1990).Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Lippincott JA, Lippincott BB: The genus Agrobacterium and plant tumorigenesis. Ann RevMicrobiol 29: 377–405 (1975).Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Liu C-N, Li X-Q, Gelvin SB: Multiple copies of virG enhance the transient transformation of celery, carrot and rice tissues by Agrobacterium tumefaciens.Plant Mol Biol 20: 1071–1087 (1992).Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Li X-Q, Liu C-N, Ritchie ST, Peng J, Gelvin SB, Hodgcs TK: Factors influencing Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression of gusA in rice. Plant Mol Biol 20: 1037–1048 (1992).Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Mooney PA, Goodwin PB, Dennis ES, Llewellyn DJ: Agrobacterium tumefaciens gene transfer into wheat tissues. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 25: 209–218 (1991).Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Odell J, Caimi P, Sauer B, Russell S: Site-directed recombination in the genome of transgenic tobacco. Mol Gen Genet 223: 369–378 (1990).Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Ohta S, Hattori T, Nakamura K: Construction and expression in tobacco of β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene containing an intron within the coding sequence. Plant Cell Physiol 31: 805–813 (1990).Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Okada K, Takebe I, Nagata T: Expression and integration of genes introduced into highly synchronized plant protoplasts. Mol Gen Genet 205: 398–403 (1986).Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Park SH, Pinson SRM, Smith RH: T-DNA integration into genomic DNA of rice following Agrobacterium inoculation of isolated shoot apices. Plant Mol Biol 32: 1135–1148 (1996).Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Park Y-D, Papp I, Moscone EA, lglesias VA, Vaucheret H, Matzke AJM, Matzke MA: Gene silencing mediated by promoter homology occurs at the level of transcription and results in meiotically hcritable alterations in methylation and gene activity. Plant J 9: 183–194 (1996).Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Peng J, Wen F, Lister RL, Hodges TK: Inheritance of gusA and neo genes in transgenic rice. Plant Mol Biol 27: 91–104 (1995).Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Potrykus I: Gene transfer to cereals: an assessment. Bio/technology 8: 535–542 (1990).Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Potrykus I: Gene transfer to plants: assessment and perspectives. Physiol Plant 79: 125–134 (1990).Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Raineri DM, Bottino P, Gordon MP, Nester EW: Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of rice (Oryza sativaL.). Bio/technology 8: 33–38.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Rashid H, Yokoi S, Toriyama K, Hinata K: Transgenic plant production mediated by Agrobacterium in Indica rice. Plant Cell Rep 15: 727–730 (1996).Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Rathore KS, Chowdhury VK, Hodges TK: Use of bar as a selectable marker gene and for the production of herbicide-resistant rice plants from protoplasts. Plant Mol Biol 21: 871–884 (1993).Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Schäfer W, Görz A, Kahl G: T-DNA integration and expression in amonocot crop plant after induction of Agrobacterium.Nature 327: 529–532 (1987).Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Schocher RJ, Shillito RD, Saul MW, Paszkowski J, Potrykus I: Co-transformation of unlinked foreign genes into plants by direct gene transfer. Bio/technology 4: 1093–1096 (1986).Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Shimamoto K, Terada R, lzawa T, Fujimoto H: Fertile transgenic rice plants regenerated from transformed protoplasts. Nature 338: 274–276 (1989).Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Shimoda N, Toyoda-Yamamoto A, Nagamine J, Usami S, Katayama M, Sakagami Y, Machida Y: Control of expression of Agrobacterium vir genes by synergistic actions of phenolic signal molecules and monosaccharides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 6684–6688 (1990).Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Sciaky D, Montoya AL, Chilton NW: Fingerprint of AgrobacteriumTi plasmids. Plasmid 1: 238–253 (1978).Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Smith RH, Hood EE: Review and interpretation: Agrobacterium tumefaciens transformation of monocotyledons. Crop Sci 35: 301–309 (1995).Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Spencer TM, O'Brien JV, Start WG, Adams TR, Gordon-Kamm WJ, Lemaux PG: Segregation of transgenes in maize. Plant Mol Biol 18: 201–210 (1992).Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Stachel SE, Messens E, van Montagu M, Zambryski PC: Identification of the signal molecules produced by wounded plants cells that activate T-DNA transfer in Agrobacterium tumefaciens.Nature 318: 624–629 (1985).Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Tada Y, Sakamoto M, Fujimura T: Efficient gene introduction into rice by electroporation and analysis of transgenic plants: use of clectroporation buffer lacking chloride ions. Theor Appl Genet 80: 475–480 (1990).Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Tomes DT, Weissinger AK, Ross M, Higgins R, Drummond BJ, Schaaf S, Malone-Schoneberg J, Staebell M, Flynn P, Anderson J, Howard J: Transgenic tobacco plants and their progeny derived by microprojectile bombardment of tobacco leaves. Plant Mol Biol 14: 261–268 (1990).Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Toriyama K, Arimoto Y, Uchimiya H, Hinata K: Transgenic plants after direct gene transfer into protoplasts. Bio/technology 6: 1072–1074 (1988).Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Turk SCHJ, Melchers LS, den Dulk-Ras H, Regensburg-Tuϊnk AJG, Hooykaas PJJ: Environmental conditions differentially affect vir gene induction in different Agrobacterium strains. Role of the Vir A sensor protein. Plant Mol Biol 16: 1051–1059 (1991).Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Usami S, Okamoto S, Takebe I, Machida Y: Factor inducing Agrobacterium tumefaciens vir gene expression is present in monocotyledonous plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 3748–3752 (1988).Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Valvekens D, van Montagu M, van Lijsebettens M: Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana root explants by using kanamycin selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 5536–5540 (1988).Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Vancanneyt G, Schmidt R, O'Connor-Sanchez A, Willmtzer L, Rocha-Sosa M: Construction of an intron-containing marker gene: splicing of the intron in transgenic plants and its use in monitoring early events in Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Mol Gen Genet 220: 245–250 (1990).Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    vanWordragen MF, Dons HJM: Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation of recalcitrant crops. Plant Mol Biol Rep 10: 12–36 (1992).Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Vasil IK: Molecular improvement of cereals. Plant Mol Biol 25: 925–937 (1994).Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Veluthambi K, Krishnan M, Gould JH, Smith RH, Gelvin SB: Opines stimulate induction of the vir genes of the Agrobacterium tumefaciensTi plasmid. J Bacteriol 171: 3696–3703 (1989).Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Vijayachandra K, Palanichelvam K, Veluthanbi K: Rice scutellum induces Agrobacterium tumefaciens vir genes and Tstrand generation. Plant Mol Biol 29: 125–133 (1995).Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Watson B, Currier TC, Gordon MP, Chilton M-D, Nester EW: Plasmid required for virulence ofAgrobacterium tumefaciens.J Bacteriol 123: 255–264 (1975).Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Wullems GJ, Molendijk L, Ooms G, Schilperoort RA: Differential expression of crown gall tumor markers in transformants obtained after in vitro Agrobacterium tumefaciens induced transformation of cell wall-regenerating protoplasts derived from Nicotiana tabacum.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78: 4344–4348 (1981).Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Wu Y, Buchholz WG, DeRose RT, Hall TC: Characterization of a rice gene family encoding root-specific proteins. Plant Mol Biol 27: 237–248 (1995).Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Xu X, Li B: Fertile transgenic rice plants obtained by clectroporation of the seed embryo cells. Plant Cell Rep 13: 237–242 (1994).Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Yoder JI, Goldsbrough AP: Transformation systems for generating marker-free transgenic plants. Bio/technology 12: 263–267 (1994).Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Zambryski P: Basic processes underlying Agrobacterium mediated DNA transfer to plant cells. Ann Rev Genet 22: 1–30 (1988).Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Zambryski P: Chronicles from the Agrobacterium-plant cell DNA transfer story. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 43: 465–490 (1992).Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Zambryski P, Joos H, Genetello C, Leemans J, van Montagu M, Schell J: Ti plasmid vector for the introduction of DNA into plant cells without alteration of their normal regeneration capacity. EMBO J 2: 2143–2150 (1983).Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Zhang HM, Yang H, Rech EL, Gold TJ, Davis AS, Mulligan BJ, Cocking EC, Davey MR: Transgenic rice plants produced by electroporation-mediated plasmid uptake into protoplast. Plant Cell Rep 7: 379–383 (1988).Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Zhang S, Chen L, Qu R, Marmey P, Beachy R, Fauquet C: Regeneration of fertile indica (group 1) rice plants following microprojectile transformation of embryogenic suspension-cultured cells. Plant Cell Rep 15: 465–469 (1996).Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Zhang W, Wu R: Efficient regeneration of transgenic plants from rice protoplasts and correctly regulated expression of the foreign gene in the plants. Theor Appl Genet 76: 835–840 (1988).Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Zupan JR, Zambryski P: Transfer of T-DNA from Agrobacterium to plants cell. Plant Physiol 107: 1041–1047 (1995).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yukoh Hiei
    • 1
  • Toshihiko Komari
    • 1
  • Tomoaki Kubo
    • 1
  1. 1.Plant Breeding and Genetics Research LaboratoryJapan Tobacco IncIwata, ShizuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations