Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 237–248 | Cite as

Are You Ethical? Please Tick Yes □ Or No □ On Researching Ethics in Business Organizations

  • Andrew Crane
Article

Abstract

This paper seeks to explore the empirical agenda of business ethics research from a methodological perspective. It is argued that the quality of empirical research in the field remains relatively poor and unconvincing. Drawing on the distinctions between the two main philosophical positions from which methodologies in the social sciences are derived – positivism and interpretism – it is argued that it is business ethics' tradition of positivist, and highly quantitative approaches which may be at the root of these epistemological problems. Six distinct aspects of business ethics research are identified and assessed according to their methodological impact. Accordingly, it is argued that more interpretive approaches may offer substantial liberating potential in the development of a stronger and more theory-rich empirical base. The author concludes by arguing for greater plurality and diversity in empirical research methodologies in the business ethics field.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abratt, R. and D. Sacks: 1989, ‘Perceptions of the Societal Marketing Concept’, European Journal of Marketing 23(6), 25–33.Google Scholar
  2. Aldag, R. J. and K. M. Bartol: 1978, ‘Empirical Studies of Corporate Social Performance and Policy: A Survey of Problems and Results’, in L. E. Preston (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy (Vol. 1) (JAI Press, Greenwich, Connecticut).Google Scholar
  3. Alvesson, M. and P. O. Berg: 1992, Corporate Culture and Organizational Symbolism (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin).Google Scholar
  4. Aupperle, K., A. Carroll and J. Hatfield: 1985, ‘An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability’, Academy of Management Journal 28, 446–463.Google Scholar
  5. Bain, W. A.: 1995, ‘Ethical Problems in Ethics Research’, Business Ethics: A European Review 4(1), 13–16.Google Scholar
  6. Bird, F. B. and J. A. Waters: 1989, ‘The Moral Muteness of Managers’, California Management Review (Fall), 73–88.Google Scholar
  7. Blackler, F. H. M. and C. A. Brown: 1983, ‘Qualitative Research and Paradigms of Practice’, Journal of Management Studies 20(3), 349–365.Google Scholar
  8. Bonoma, T. V.: 1985, ‘Case Research in Marketing: Opportunities, Problems, and a Process’, Journal of Marketing Research XXII (May), 199–208.Google Scholar
  9. Brigley, S.: 1995, ‘Business Ethics Research: A Cultural Perspective’, Business Ethics: A European Review 4(1), 17–23.Google Scholar
  10. Burrell, G. and G. Morgan: 1979, Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis (Heineman, London).Google Scholar
  11. Collier, J.: 1995, ‘Business Ethics Research: Shaping the Agenda’, Business Ethics: A European Review 4(1), 6–12.Google Scholar
  12. Collins, J. W. and C. G. Ganotis: 1973, ‘Is Social Responsibility Sabotaged by the Rank and File?’, Business and Society Review/Innovation (Autumn), 82–88.Google Scholar
  13. Crane, A.: 1995, ‘Rhetoric and Reality in the Greening of Organizational Culture’, Greener Management International 12, 49–62.Google Scholar
  14. Crane, A.: 1997, ‘The Dynamics of Marketing Ethical Products: A Cultural Perspective’, Journal of Marketing Management, in press.Google Scholar
  15. Diacon, S. D. and C. T. Ennew: 1996a, ‘Ethical Issues in Insurance Marketing in the U.K.’, European Journal of Marketing 30(5), 67–80.Google Scholar
  16. Diacon, S. D. and C. T. Ennew: 1996b, ‘Can Business Ethics Enhance Corporate Governance? Evidence from a Survey of U.K. Insurance Executives’, Journal of Business Ethics 15, 623–634.Google Scholar
  17. Dooley, R. S. and L. D. Lerner: 1994, ‘Pollution, Profits, and Stakeholders: The Constraining Effect of Economic Performance on CEO Concern with Stakeholder Expectations’, Journal of Business Ethics 13, 701–711.Google Scholar
  18. Drumwright, M.: 1994, ‘Socially Responsible Organizational Buying: Environmental Concern as a Noneconomic Buying Criterion’, Journal of Marketing 58 (July), 1–19.Google Scholar
  19. Drumwright, M.: 1996, ‘Company Advertising with a Social Dimension: The Role of Noneconomic Criteria’, Journal of Marketing 60(4), 71–87.Google Scholar
  20. Easterby-Smith, M., R. Thorpe and A. Lowe: 1991, Management Research (Sage Publications, London).Google Scholar
  21. Eisenhardt, K. M.: 1989, ‘Building Theories from Case Study Research’, Academy of Management Review 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
  22. Evered, R and M. R. Louis: 1981, ‘Alternative Perspectives in the Organisational Sciences’, Academy of Management Review 6(3), 385–395.Google Scholar
  23. Fineman, S.: 1995, ‘Moral Meanings and Green Organisational Change’, Paper presented at Academy of Management Meeting, Vancouver.Google Scholar
  24. Fineman, S.: 1996, ‘Emotional Subtexts in Corporate Greening’, Organization Studies 17(3), 479–500.Google Scholar
  25. Fineman S.: 1997, ‘Constructing the Green Manager’, in P. McDonagh and A. Prothero (eds.), Green Management: A Reader (Dryden Press, London).Google Scholar
  26. Ford, R. and F. Mclaughlin: 1984, ‘Perceptions of Socially Responsible Activities and Attitudes: A Comparison of Business School Deans and Corporate Chief Executives’, Academy of Management Journal (September).Google Scholar
  27. Gladwin, T. N.: 1993, ‘The Meaning of Greening: A Plea for Organizational Theory’, in K. Fischer and J. Schot (eds.), Environmental Strategies for Industry (Island Press, Washington D.C.).Google Scholar
  28. Geertz, C.: 1973, The Interpretation of Cultures (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  29. Glaser, B. G. and A. L. Strauss: 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory (Aldine, New York).Google Scholar
  30. Gray, R., R. Kouhy and S. Lavers: 1995a, ‘Methodological Themes: Constructing a Research Database of Social and Environmental Reporting by U.K. Companies’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 8(2), 78–101.Google Scholar
  31. Gray, R., R. Kouhy and S. Lavers: 1995b, ‘Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting: A Review of the Literature and a Longitudinal Study of U.K. Disclosure’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 8(2), 46–77.Google Scholar
  32. Greening, D. W. and B. Gray: 1994, ‘Testing a Model of Organizational Response to Social and Political Issues’, Academy of Management Journal 37(3), 467–498.Google Scholar
  33. Harvey, B., S. Smith and B, Wilkinson: 1984, Managers and Corporate Social Policy (Macmillan Press, London).Google Scholar
  34. Hassard, J.: 1993, Sociology and Organization Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  35. Hunt, S. D. and S. J. Vitell: 1986, ‘A General Theory of Marketing Ethics’, Journal of Macromarketing 6 (Spring), 5–16.Google Scholar
  36. Hunt, S. D., V. R. Wood and L. B. Chonko: 1989, ‘Corporate Ethical Values and Organizational Commitment in Marketing’, Journal of Marketing 53 (July), 79–90.Google Scholar
  37. Hunt, S. D., P. L. Kieker and L. B. Chonko: 1990, ‘Social Responsibility and Personal Success: A Research Note’, Journal of the Academy of Management Science 18(3), 239–244.Google Scholar
  38. Iyer, E., B, Banerjee and C. Gulas: 1994, ‘An Exposé on Green Television Ads’, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol 21 (Association for Consumer Research, Chicago).Google Scholar
  39. Jackall, R.: 1988, Moral Mazes (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  40. Lill, D., C. Gross and R. Peterson: 1986, ‘The Inclusion of Social Responsibility Themes by Magazine Advertisers: A Longitudinal Study’, Journal of Advertising 15(2), 35–41.Google Scholar
  41. Martin, J.: 1992, Cultures in Organizations: Three Perspectives (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  42. Mathews, B. P. and A. Diamantopoulos: 1995, ‘An Analysis of Response Bias in Executive's Self-Reports’, Journal of Marketing Management 11(8), 835–846.Google Scholar
  43. McGuire, J. B., A. Sundgren and T. Schneeweis: 1988, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance’, Academy of Management Journal 28, 446–443.Google Scholar
  44. Miles, M. B. and A. M. Huberman: 1994, Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  45. Mintzberg, H.: 1989, Mintzberg on Management (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  46. Morgan, G.: 1983a, ‘Research as Engagement: A Personal View’, in G. Morgan (ed.), Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
  47. Morgan, G.: 1983b, ‘Research Strategies: Modes of Engagement’, in G. Morgan (ed.), Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
  48. Morgan, G. and L. Smircich: 1980, ‘The Case for Qualitative Research’, Academy of Management Review 5, 491–500.Google Scholar
  49. Nichols, T.: 1969, Ownership, Control and Ideology (George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London).Google Scholar
  50. Owen, C. L. and R. F. Scherer: 1993, ‘Social Responsibility and Market Share’, Review of Business 15(1), 11–16.Google Scholar
  51. Pettigrew, A. M.: 1979, ‘On Studying Organizational Cultures’, Administrative Science Quarterly 24, 570–581.Google Scholar
  52. Phillips, N. and J. L. Brown: 1993, ‘Analyzing Communications In and Around Organizations: A Critical Hermeneutic Approach’, Academy of Management Journal 36(6), 1547–1576.Google Scholar
  53. Prothero, A. and P. McDonagh: 1992, ‘Producing Environmentally Acceptable Cosmetics? The Impact of Environmentalism on the United Kingdom Cosmetics and Toiletries Industry’, Journal of Marketing Management 8, 147–166.Google Scholar
  54. Randall, D. M. and A. M. Gibson: 1990, ‘Methodology in Business Ethics Research: A Review and Critical Assessment’, Journal of Business Ethics 9(6), 457–471.Google Scholar
  55. Robin, D. P. and E. Reidenbach: 1987, ‘Social Responsibility, Ethics, and Marketing Strategy: Closing the Gap Between Concept and Application’, Journal of Marketing 51 (Jan), 44–58.Google Scholar
  56. Salancik, G. R.: 1979, ‘Field Stimulations for Organizational Behaviour Research’, Administrative Science Quarterly 24, 638–649.Google Scholar
  57. Schein, E. H.: 1992, Organizational Culture and Leadership, 2nd ed. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  58. Sethi, S. P. (ed.): 1974, Unstable Ground: Corporate Social Policy in a Dynamic Society (Melville Publishing, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
  59. Sinclair, A.: 1993, ‘Approaches to Organisational Culture and Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 12, 63–73.Google Scholar
  60. Smith, N. C.: 1991, ‘The Case Study: A Vital Yet Misunderstood Research Method for Management’, in N. C. Smith and P. Dainty (eds.), The Management Research Handbook (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
  61. Starkey, K.: 1990, ‘Studies on Transitions: Meanings and Method’, Journal of Management Studies 27(1), 97–110.Google Scholar
  62. Trevino, L. K. and K. A. Nelson: 1995, Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk About How To Do It Right (John Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  63. Turner, B. A.: 1992, ‘The Symbolic Understanding of Organizations’, in M. Reed and M. Hughes (ed.), Rethinking Organization (Sage Publications, London).Google Scholar
  64. Ullmann, A.: 1985, ‘Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationship Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance’, Academy of Management Review 10, 540–577.Google Scholar
  65. Vitell, S. J., K.C. Rallapalli and A. Singhapakdi: 1993, ‘Marketing Norms: The Influence of Personal Moral Philosophies and Organizational Ethical Culture’, Journal of the Academy of Management Science 21(4), 331–337.Google Scholar
  66. Waters, J. A. and F. Bird: 1987, ‘The Moral Dimension of Organizational Culture’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, 15–22.Google Scholar
  67. Wood, V.R., L. B. Chonko and S. D. Hunt: 1986, ‘Social Responsibility and Personal Success: Are They Incompatible?’, Journal of Business Research 14, 193–212.Google Scholar
  68. Yin, R.: 1989, Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Revised ed.) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Crane
    • 1
  1. 1.Cardiff Business SchoolUniversity of Wales, CardiffCardiff

Personalised recommendations