Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 52, Issue 3, pp 425–439 | Cite as

Sampling Benthic Macroinvertebrates in a Large Flood-Plain River: Considerations of Study Design, Sample Size, and Cost

  • Lynn A. Bartsch
  • William B. Richardson
  • Teresa J. Naimo


Estimation of benthic macroinvertebrate populations over large spatial scales is difficult due to the high variability in abundance and the cost of sample processing and taxonomic analysis. To determine a cost-effective, statistically powerful sample design, we conducted an exploratory study of the spatial variation of benthic macroinvertebrates in a 37 km reach of the Upper Mississippi River. We sampled benthos at 36 sites within each of two strata, contiguous backwater and channel border. Three standard ponar (525 cm2) grab samples were obtained at each site ('Original Design'). Analysis of variance and sampling cost of strata-wide estimates for abundance of Oligochaeta, Chironomidae, and total invertebrates showed that only one ponar sample per site ('Reduced Design') yielded essentially the same abundance estimates as the Original Design, while reducing the overall cost by 63%. A posteriori statistical power analysis (α = 0.05, β = 0.20) on the Reduced Design estimated that at least 18 sites per stratum were needed to detect differences in mean abundance between contiguous backwater and channel border areas for Oligochaeta, Chironomidae, and total invertebrates. Statistical power was nearly identical for the three taxonomic groups. The abundances of several taxa of concern (e.g., Hexagenia mayflies and Musculium fingernail clams) were too spatially variable to estimate power with our method. Resampling simulations indicated that to achieve adequate sampling precision for Oligochaeta, at least 36 sample sites per stratum would be required, whereas a sampling precision of 0.2 would not be attained with any sample size for Hexagenia in channel border areas, or Chironomidae and Musculium in both strata given the variance structure of the original samples. Community-wide diversity indices (Brillouin and 1-Simpsons) increased as sample area per site increased. The backwater area had higher diversity than the channel border area. The number of sampling sites required to sample benthic macroinvertebrates during our sampling period depended on the study objective and ranged from 18 to more than 40 sites per stratum. No single sampling regime would efficiently and adequately sample all components of the macroinvertebrate community.


Taxonomic Group Adequate Sampling Original Design Large Spatial Scale Macroinvertebrate Community 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brillouin, L.: 1962, Science and Information Theory, Academic Press, New York, New York, 351 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Bros, W. E. and Cowell, B. C.: 1987, 'A technique for optimizing sample size (replication)', J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 114, 63–71.Google Scholar
  3. Burch, J. B.: 1972, Freshwater sphaericean clams (Mollusca: Pelecypoda) of North America, Water Pollution Control Research Series, Biota of Freshwater Ecosystems, Identification Manual No. 3, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.Google Scholar
  4. Burch, J. B.: 1973, Freshwater sphaericean clams (Mollusca: Pelecypoda) of North America, Water Pollution Control Research Series, Biota of Freshwater Ecosystems, Identification Manual No. 11, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.Google Scholar
  5. Burch, J. B.: 1982, Freshwater snails (Mollusca: Gastropoda) of North America, Report EPA-600/3-82-026, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.Google Scholar
  6. Cuff, W. and Coleman, N.: 1979, 'Optimal survey design: lessons from a stratified random sampling of macrobenthos', J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 36, 351–361.Google Scholar
  7. Downing, J. A.: 1979, 'Aggregation, transformation, and design of sampling programs', J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 36, 1454–1463.Google Scholar
  8. Downing. J. A.: 1989, 'Precision of the mean and the design of benthos sampling programmes: caution advised', Mar. Biol. 103, 231–234.Google Scholar
  9. Elliott, J. M.: 1977, Some Methods for the Statistical Analysis of Samples of Benthic Invertebrates, 2nd ed., Sci. Publ. No. 25, Freshwater Biological Association, Ferry House, U.K., 156 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Gilbert, R. O.: 1987, Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. Inc., New York, New York, 320 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Green, R. H.: 1979, Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental Biologists, John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, 257 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Green. R. H.: 1980, 'Comment on optimal survey design', Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37, 296.Google Scholar
  13. Heltshe, J. F. and DiCanzio, J.: 1985, 'Power study of jack-knifed diversity indices to detect change', J. Environ. Manage. 21, 331–341.Google Scholar
  14. Heyer, R. W. and Berven, K. A.: 1973, 'Species diversity of herpetofauna samples from similar microhabitats at two tropical stations', Ecology 54, 642–645.Google Scholar
  15. Klemm, D. J.: 1985, A Guide to the Freshwater Annelida (Polychaeta, Naidid and Tubificid Oligochaeta, and Hirudinea) of North America, Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, Iowa, 198 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Lamberti, G. A. and Resh, V. H.: 1977, 'Spatial distribution patterns and sampling variability in the benthic chironomidae fauna of Clear Lake, California', Proc. Annu. Conf. Calif. Mosquito Vector Control Assoc. 45, 222–225.Google Scholar
  17. Mason, W. T. and Yevich, P. P.: 1967, 'The use of phioxine B and rose bengal stains to facilitate sorting benthic samples', Trans. Am. Microscop. Soc. 86, 221–223.Google Scholar
  18. Merritt, R.W. and Cummins, K.W.: 1984, An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North Americam, 2nd ed., Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co., Dubuque, Iowa, 722 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Needham, J. G. and Westfall Jr, M. J.: 1955, A Manual of the Dragnonflies of North America (Anisoptera) Including the Greater Antilles and the Provinces of the Mexican Border, Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, California, 615 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Peckarsky, B. L., Fraissinet, P. R., Penton, M. A and Conklin, Jr., D. J.: 1990, Freshwater Macroin-vertebrates of Northeastern United States, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 442 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Peet, R. K.: 1974, 'The measurement of species diversity', Annu. Rev. Ecol. Systemat. 5, 285–307.Google Scholar
  22. Pennak, R. W.: 1989, Freshwater Invertebrates of the United States: Protozoa to Mollusca, 3rd ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, New York, 628 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Peterman, R. M.: 1990, 'Statistical power analysis can improve fisheries research and management', Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47, 2–15.Google Scholar
  24. Pielou, E. C.: 1966, 'The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections', J. Theoret. Biol. 13, 131–144.Google Scholar
  25. Pielou, E. C.: 1975, Ecological Diversity, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, New York, 165 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Pringle, J. D.: 1984, 'Efficiency estimates for various quadrat sizes used in benthic sampling', Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 41, 1485–1489.Google Scholar
  27. Resh, V. H.: 1977, 'Habitat and substrata influences on polutation and production dynamics of a stream caddisfly, Ceraclea ancylus (Leptoceridae)', Freshwater Biol. 7, 261–277.Google Scholar
  28. Resh, V. H.: 1979, 'Sampling variability and life history features: basic considerations in the design of aquatic insect studies', J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 36, 290–311.Google Scholar
  29. Resh, V. H. and Rosenberg, D. M.: 1989, 'Spatial-temporal variability and the study of aquatic insects', Can. Entomol. 121, 941–963.Google Scholar
  30. Rotenberry, J. T. and Wiens, J. A.: 1985, 'Statistical power analysis and community-wide patterns', Am. Nat. 125, 164–168.Google Scholar
  31. Shapiro, S. S. and Wilk, W. B.: 1965, 'An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)', Biometrika 52, 591–611.Google Scholar
  32. Simpson, E. H.: 1949, 'Measurement of diversity', Nature 163, 688.Google Scholar
  33. Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J.: 1981, Biometry, W. H. Freeman and Co., New York, 859 pp.Google Scholar
  34. Stewart, K. W. and Stark, B. P.: 1988, Nymphs of North American stonefly genera (Plecoptera), Entomological Society of America Thomas Say Foundation 12, 1–460.Google Scholar
  35. Toft, C. A. and Shea, P. J.: 1983, 'Detecting communitywide patterns: estimating power strengthens statistical inference', Am. Nat. 122, 618–625.Google Scholar
  36. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District: 1974, Final environmental impact statement; operation and maintenance 9-foot navigation channel Upper Mississippi River head of navigation to Guttenberg, Iowa, Vol. II, exhibits, St. Paul, Minnesota, 508 pp.Google Scholar
  37. Wilcox, D. B.: 1993, An aquatic habitat classification system for the Upper Mississippi River System, Long Term Resource Monitoring Program Technical Report 93-T003, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Onalaska, Wisconsin, 9 pp.Google Scholar
  38. Winer, B. J., Brown, D. R. and Michels, K. M.: 1991, Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, 1057 pp.Google Scholar
  39. Zar, J. H.: 1984, Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 718 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lynn A. Bartsch
  • William B. Richardson
  • Teresa J. Naimo

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations