Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 315–335 | Cite as

Family migration and changes in women's earnings: A decomposition analysis

  • Felicia B. LeClere
  • Diane K. McLaughlin
Article

Abstract

Married women who migrate with their families experience relative earnings losses after migration. In this study, we use data from the 1987 Wave of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics to explicitly examine the relative importance of three sources of those losses: labor force participation, hours of labor supplied, and wages. We estimate earnings models with Heckman's sample selection method for each of four years following migration. The results and subsequent coefficient decomposition methods show that labor force exit and a reduction of labor supplied contribute the largest share to the earnings penalty attached to migration for married women. The participation effect, although reduced in size, is significant for three years following migration. The wages of employed married women who migrate appear to be unaffected in any year following migration.

Earnings Family Married women Migration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, G. 1989. A treatise on the family. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bielby, W.T. & Bielby, D.D. (1992). I will follow him: Gender role beliefs, and reluctance to relocate to a better job, American Journal of Sociology 97: 1241-1267.Google Scholar
  3. Bird, G. & Bird, G.W. (1985). Determinants of mobility in two-earner families: Does the wife's income count?, Journal of Marriage and the Family 47: 753-758.Google Scholar
  4. Cooke, T.J. & Bailey, A.J. (1996). Family migration and the employment of married men and women, Economic Geography 72: 38-46.Google Scholar
  5. DaVanzo, J. (1976). Why families move: A model of the mobility of married couples. The Rand Corporation, R-1976-DOL.Google Scholar
  6. Heckman, J. (1973). Sample selection as a specification bias, Econometrica 47: 153-161.Google Scholar
  7. Kahne, H. (1978). Review essay: Economic research on women and families, Signs 3: 652-665.Google Scholar
  8. Lichter, D.T. (1983). Socioeconomic returns to migration among married women, Social Forces 62: 487-503.Google Scholar
  9. Lichter, D.T. (1982). The migration of dual earner couples: Does the wife's job matter?, Social Science Quarterly 63: 48-57.Google Scholar
  10. Lichter, D.T. (1980). Household migration and the labor market position of married women, Social Science Research 9: 83-97.Google Scholar
  11. Liu, K., McBride, T. & Coughlin, T.A. (1990). Costs of community care for the disabled elderly, Inquiry 27: 61-72.Google Scholar
  12. Long, L. (1974). Women's labor force participation and the residential mobility of families, Social Forces 52: 342-348.Google Scholar
  13. McDonald, J.F. & Moffitt, R.A. (1980). The uses of Tobit analysis, The Review of Economics and Statistics 62: 318-320.Google Scholar
  14. Maddala, G.S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Markham, W.T. (1987). Sex, relocation, and occupational advancement: The real cruncher for women, Women and Work 2: 207-231.Google Scholar
  16. Maxwell, N. (1988). Economic returns to migration: Marital status and gender differences, Social Science Quarterly 69: 108-121.Google Scholar
  17. Menchik, M.D. & Witsberger, C. (1983). How working wives affect migration and divorce decisions. The Rand Corporation, N-2019-NICHD.Google Scholar
  18. Mincer, J. (1978). Family migration decisions, Journal of Political Economy 86: 749-773.Google Scholar
  19. Mincer, J. & Ofek, H. (1982). Interrupted work careers: Depreciation and restoration of human capital, The Journal of Human Resources 17: 1-24.Google Scholar
  20. Moen, P. (1985). Continuities and discontinuities in women's labor force activity. In G. Elder (ed.), Life course dynamics: Trajectories and transitions, 1968-1980 (pp. 113-155). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Morrison, D.R. & Lichter, D.T. (1988). Family migration and female employment: the problem of underemployment among migrant married women, Journal of Marriage and the Family 50: 161-172.Google Scholar
  22. Mott, D. (1990). The impacts of husbands and wives job fit on family migration. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  23. Pedraza, S. (1991). Women and migration: The social consequences of gender. In W.R. Scott (ed.), Annual review of sociology, Vol. 17. Washington, DC: Annual Reviews Inc.Google Scholar
  24. Polachek, S. & Horvath, F. (1977). The life cycle hypothesis approach to migration. In R. Ehrenberg (ed.), Research in labor economics (pp. 103-149). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  25. Rytina, N.F. (1981). The economic status of migrant wives: An application of discriminant analysis, Sociology and Social Research 65: 142-152.Google Scholar
  26. Sandell, S. (1977). Women and the economics of migration, The Review of Economics and Statistics 59: 406-414.Google Scholar
  27. Shihadeh, E. (1991). The prevalence of husband-centered migration: employment consequences for married mothers, Journal of Marriage and the Family 53: 432-444.Google Scholar
  28. Spitze, G. (1986). Family migration largely unresponsive to wife's employment (across age groups), Sociology and Social Research 70: 231-234.Google Scholar
  29. Spitze, G. (1984). The effect of family migration on wives' employment: How long does it last?, Social Science Quarterly 65: 21-36.Google Scholar
  30. Winship, C. & Mare, R.D. (1991). Models for sample selection bias. University of Wisconsin, Center for Demography and Ecology Working Paper, 91-36.Google Scholar
  31. Yu, L., Wang, M.Q. & Kaltreider, L. (1993). The impact of family migration and family life cycle on the employment status of married, college-educated women, Work and Occupations 20: 233-242.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Felicia B. LeClere
    • 1
  • Diane K. McLaughlin
    • 2
  1. 1.National Center for Health StatisticsHyattsvilleUSA
  2. 2.Population Research InstituteThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations