Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 17, Issue 7, pp 745–755 | Cite as

The Agent'ss Ethics in the Principal-Agent Model

  • Øyvind Bøhren

Abstract

This paper evaluates the current use of the Principal Agent Model (PAM) in accounting and finance, focusing on the agent'ss use of private information. The agent'ss behavioral norms in the the PAM deviate from commonly held ethical values in society, from models of man in conventional economic theory, and also from behavioral foundations of related business school fields like corporate strategy, business ethics, and human resource management. Still, it would be unwise to reject the PAM solely because of its distasteful ethical assumptions. The model does appear to have predictive power, but its descriptive or normative qualities remain unexplored. The popularity of the PAM, with its extreme model of man, raises fundamental questions about the impact of this model on business school stakeholders and society at large.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akerlof, G.: 1970, ‘The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 84, 488–500.Google Scholar
  2. Alchian, A. A. and H. Demsetz: 1972, ‘Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization’, American Economic Review 62, 777–795.Google Scholar
  3. Arrow, K.: 1975, ‘Gifts and Exchanges’, in E. S. Phelps (ed.), Altruism, Morality, and Economic Theory (Russell Sage Foundation, NY), pp. 13–28.Google Scholar
  4. Baumol, W. J.: 1959, Business Behavior, Value and Growth(Macmillan, NY).Google Scholar
  5. Bergen, M., S. Dutta, and O. C. Walker, Jr.: 1992, ‘Agency Relationships in Marketing: A Review of the Implications and Applications of Agency and Related Topics’, Journal of Marketing 58, 1–24.Google Scholar
  6. Berle, A. and G. Means: 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property(Macmillan, NY).Google Scholar
  7. Brennan, M. J.: 1994, ‘Incentives, Rationality and Society’, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 7, 31–39.Google Scholar
  8. Butler, J.: 1726, Fifteen Sermons. Google Scholar
  9. Dasgupta, P.: 1988, ‘Trust as a Commodity’, in D. Gambetta (ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations(Basic Blackwell, NY).Google Scholar
  10. Diamond, D. W.: 1984, ‘Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring’, Review of Economic Studies 51, 393–414.Google Scholar
  11. Eisenhardt, K. M.: 1989, ‘Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review’, Academy of Management Review 14, 57–74.Google Scholar
  12. Etzioni, A.: 1988, The Moral Dimension-Toward a New Economics(The Free Press, NY).Google Scholar
  13. Fama, E. F. and M. H. Miller: 1972, The Theory of Finance(Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, NY).Google Scholar
  14. Frank, R. H., T. Gilovich and D. T. Regan: 1993, ‘Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperation?’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 7, 159–171.Google Scholar
  15. Friedman, M.: 1953, ‘The Methodology of Positive Economics’, in M. Friedman (ed.), Essays in Positive Economics(University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).Google Scholar
  16. Harris, M. and A. Raviv: 1991, ‘The Theory of Capital Structure’, Journal of Finance 46, 297–355.Google Scholar
  17. Hausman, D. M. and M. S. McPherson: 1993, ‘Taking Ethics Seriously: Economics and Contemporary Moral Philosophy’, Journal of Economic Literature 31, 671–731.Google Scholar
  18. Hirsch, P., S. Michaels and R. Friedman: 1987, ‘Dirty Hands versus Clean Models: Is Sociology in Danger of being Seduced by Economists?’, Theory and Society 16, 317–336.Google Scholar
  19. Hobbes, T.: 1651, Leviathan, ed. C. B. Macpherson (Penguin Group, London, 1968).Google Scholar
  20. Horrigan, J. O.: 1987, ‘The Ethics of the New Finance’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, 97–110.Google Scholar
  21. Jensen, M.: 1983, ‘Organization Theory and Methodology’, Accounting Review 58, 319–338.Google Scholar
  22. Jensen, M. and W. Meckling: 1976, ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure’, Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305–360.Google Scholar
  23. Jensen, M. and K. J. Murphy: 1990, ‘Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives’, Journal of Political Economy 98, 225–264.Google Scholar
  24. Kaen, F. R., A. Kaufman and L. Zacharias: 1988, ‘American Political Values and Agency Theory - A Perspective’, Journal of Business Ethics 7, 805–820.Google Scholar
  25. Kant, I: 1785, Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, trans. H. J. Paton as Groundwork of the Methaphysics of Morals (Harper & Row, NY, 1964).Google Scholar
  26. Keeney, R. L. and H. Raiffa: 1976, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (John Wiley: NY.Google Scholar
  27. Loderer, C. and K. Martin: 1994, ‘Executive Stock Ownership and Performance: Tracking Faint Traces’, unpublished working paper, University of Bern and University of Iowa.Google Scholar
  28. Mill, J. S.: 1863, ‘Utilitarianism’, in M. Warnok (ed.), Mill: Utilitarianism and other Writings(Collins, Glasgow, 1962).Google Scholar
  29. Mueller, D. C.: 1992, ‘The Corporation and the Economist’, International Journal of Industrial Organization 10, 147–169.Google Scholar
  30. Myers, S. C. and N. S. Majluf: 1984, ‘Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions when Firms have Information that Investors do not Have’, Journal of Financial Economics 13, 187–221.Google Scholar
  31. Noreen, E.: 1988, ‘The Economics of Ethics: A New Perspective on Agency Theory’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 13, 359–369.Google Scholar
  32. Parfit, D.: 1984, Reasons and Persons. Google Scholar
  33. Perrow, C.: 1986, Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay(Random House, NY).Google Scholar
  34. Rasmusen, E.: 1989, Games and Information(Basil Blackwell, NY).Google Scholar
  35. Reder, M.: 1979, ‘The Place of Ethics in the Theory of Production’, in M. Boskin (ed.), Economics and Human Welfare: Essays in Honor of Boris Scitovsky (Academic Press, NY), pp. 133–146.Google Scholar
  36. Ross, S. A.: 1987‘The Interrelations of Finance and Economics: Theoretical Perspectives’, American Economic Review 77, 29–34.Google Scholar
  37. Shaftesbury, E.: 1711, Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times. Google Scholar
  38. Sidgwick, H.: 1874, The Methods of Ethics.Google Scholar
  39. Smith, A.: 1776, The Wealth of Nations, Cannan edition (Modern Library, NY, 1937).Google Scholar
  40. Spence, A. M.: 1973, ‘Job Market Signalling’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 87, 355–374.Google Scholar
  41. Vancil, R. F.: 1987, Passing the Baton(Harvard Business School, MA).Google Scholar
  42. Walker, M.: 1989, ‘Agency Theory: A Falsificationist Perspective’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 14, 433–453.Google Scholar
  43. Williamson, O. E.: 1964, The Economics of Discretionary Behavior: Managerial Objectives in a Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Øyvind Bøhren

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations