Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 665–682 | Cite as

Ethical and Unethical Bargaining Tactics: An Empirical Study

  • Roy J. Lewicki
  • Robert J. Robinson


Competitive negotiators frequently use tactics which others view as "unethical", in that these tactics either violate standards of truth telling or violate the perceived rules of negotiation. This paper sought to determine how business students viewed a number of marginally ethical negotiating tactics, and to determine the underlying factor structure of these tactics. The factor analysis of these tactics revealed five clear factors which were highly similar across the two samples, and which parallel (to a moderate degree) categories of tactics proposed by earlier theory. Data from one sample also permitted comparisons of the appropriateness of certain tactics across gender, nationality, ethnic origin and perception of one's negotiating style.


Economic Growth Empirical Study Factor Structure Moderate Degree Ethnic Origin 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anton, R. J.: 1990, ‘Drawing the Line: An Exploratory Test of Ethical Behavior in Negotiation’, The International Journal of Conflict Management 1(3), 265–280.Google Scholar
  2. Ash, P.: 1991, The Construct of Employee Theft Proneness (SRA/London House, Park Ridge, IL).Google Scholar
  3. Bies, R.: 1989, ‘Managing Conflict Before It Happens: The Role of Accounts’, in M. A. Rahim (ed.), Managing Conflict: An Interdisciplinary Approach (Praeger, New York), pp. 83–91.Google Scholar
  4. Bok, S. L.: 1978, Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life(Pantheon, New York).Google Scholar
  5. Brown, B. R.: 1968, ‘The Effects of Need to Maintain Face on Interpersonal Bargaining’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 4, 107–122.Google Scholar
  6. Carson, T.: 1993, ‘Second Thoughts about Bluffing’, Business Ethics Quarterly 3(4).Google Scholar
  7. Chertkoff, J. M. and S. L. Baird: 1971, ‘Applicability of the Big Lie Technique and the Last Clear Chance Doctrine in Bargaining’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 20, 298–303.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, H.: 1980, You Can Negotiate Anything(Lyle Stuart, Secaucus, NJ).Google Scholar
  9. Crampton, Peter C. and J. Gregory Dees: 1993,’ Promoting Honesty in Negotiation’, Business Ethics Quarterly 3(4).Google Scholar
  10. Forsyth, D.: 1980, ‘A Taxonomy of Ethical Ideologies’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, 175–184.Google Scholar
  11. French, J. R. P. and B. Raven: 1959, ‘The Bases of Social Power’, in D. Cartwright (ed.), Studies in Social Power(Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI).Google Scholar
  12. Guttman, L.: 1954, ‘Some Necessary Conditions for Common Factor Analysis’, Psychometrika 19, 149–161.Google Scholar
  13. “Hey Ma, Get Me A Lawyer!”, Newsweek, October 30, l989, p. 10.Google Scholar
  14. Hollinger, R. C. and J. P. Clark: 1983, Theft by Employees(D.C. Heath, Lexington, MA).Google Scholar
  15. Karrass, C.: 1974, Give and Take(Thomas Y. Crowell, New York).Google Scholar
  16. Lax, D. A. and J. K. Sebenius: 1986, The Manager as Negotiator(Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  17. Lewicki, R. J.: 1983, ‘Lying and Deception: A Behavioral Model’, in M. H. Bazerman and R. J. Lewicki (eds.), Negotiating in Organizations(Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA).Google Scholar
  18. Lewicki, R. J., J. Litterer, J. Minton and D. Saunders: 1994, Negotiation. Second Edition (Richard D. Irwin, Burr Ridge, IL).Google Scholar
  19. Lewicki, R. J. and G. Spencer: 1991, Ethical relativism and negotiating tactics: Factors affecting their perceived ethicality. Paper presented at the Academy of Management, Miami, August 1991.Google Scholar
  20. Lewicki, R. J. and N. Stark: 1996, ‘What's Ethically Appropriate in Negotiations: An Examination of Negotiation Ethics’, Social Justice Research 9(1), 69–95.Google Scholar
  21. Lewicki, R. J., T. Poland, J. Minton and B. H. Sheppard: 1997, ‘Deviance as Dishonesty: A Typology of Workplace Dishonesty and Key Contributing Factors’, in R. J. Lewicki, R. Bies and B. H. Sheppard (eds.), Research on Negotiation in Organizations 7, in preparation.Google Scholar
  22. Mintzberg, H.: 1973, The Nature of Managerial Work (Harper and Row, New York).Google Scholar
  23. Murphy, K. R.: 1993, Honesty in the Workplace(Brooks Cole, Pacific Grove, CA).Google Scholar
  24. Pfeffer, J.: 1993, Managing with Power(Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  25. Robinson, R., J., R. J. Lewicki and E. Donohue: 1996, Extending and testing a five factor model of ethical and unethical bargaining tactics: Introducing the SINS scale. Paper presented to the International Association of Conflict Managment, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  26. Rummel, R. J.: 1970, Applied Factor Analysis (Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL).Google Scholar
  27. Staw, B.: 1979, ‘Rationality and Justification in Organizational Life’, in B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior 2, 45–80.Google Scholar
  28. Stevens, J.: 1992, Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. Second Edition (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J.).Google Scholar
  29. Trevino, L. K., K. D. Butterfield and D. L. McCabe: 1996, ‘The Ethical Context in Organizations: Influences on Employee Attitudes and Behavior’, Business Ethics Quarterly, in press.Google Scholar
  30. Watson, C.: 1994, ‘Gender Differences in Negotiating Behavior and Outcomes: Fact or Artifact?’, in A. Taylor and J. Beinstein-Miller (eds.), Conflict and Gender(Hampton Press, Inc., Cresskill, NJ), pp. 191–210.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roy J. Lewicki
  • Robert J. Robinson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations