Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 75–102 | Cite as

Linking Adaptation and Mitigation in Climate Change Policy

  • Sally Kane
  • Jason F. Shogren
Article

Abstract

How people privately and collectively adapt to climate risk can affect the costs and benefits of public mitigation policy (e.g., Kyoto); an obvious point often neglected in actual policy making. Herein we use the economic theory of endogenous risk to address this optimal mix of mitigation and adaptation strategies, and examine how increased variability in climate change threats affects this mix. We stress that a better understanding of the cross-links between mitigation and adaptation would potentially make it possible to provide more risk reduction with less wealth. Policies that are formulated without considering the cross-links can unintentionally undermine the effectiveness of public sector policies and programs because of unaddressed conflicts between the strategies. We also discuss the cross-disciplinary lessons to be learned from this literature, and identify important research questions to spur discussion in the next round of inquiry.

Keywords

Climate Change Policy Making Public Sector Risk Reduction Change Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agee, M. and Crocker, T.: 1996, ‘Parental Altruism and Child Lead Exposure’, Journal of Human Resources, 31, 677–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archer, D. and Shogren, J.: 1996, ‘Endogenous Risk in Weed Control Management’, Agricultural Economics, 14, 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnott, R. and Stiglitz, J.: 1988, ‘The Basic Analytics of Moral Hazard’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 88, 383–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arrow, K.: 1963, ‘Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care’, American Economic Review, 53, 941–973.Google Scholar
  5. ABARE and Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade: 1995, Global Climate Change: Economic Dimensions of a Cooperative International Policy Response Beyond 2000, ABARE, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  6. Barrett, S.: 1998, ‘On the Theory and Diplomacy of Environmental Treaty-Making’, Environmental and Resource Economics, 11, 317–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barron, E.: 1995, ‘Climate Models: How Reliable are their Predictions’, Consequences, 1, 16–27.Google Scholar
  8. Benedick, R.: 1991, Ozone Diplomacy: New Directions in Safeguarding the Planet, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
  9. Bradley, M. and Lehman, D.: 1986, ‘Comparative Equilibrium versus Comparative Statics’, Canadian Journal of Economics, 19, 526–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bolin, B.: 1998a, ‘The Kyoto Negotiations on Climate Change: A Science Perspective’, Science, 279, 330–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bolin, B.: 1998b. ‘Key Features of the Global Climate System to be Considered in Analysis of the Climate Change Debate’, Environment and Development Economics, 3, 348–365.Google Scholar
  12. Bouzaher, A. Holtkamp, D, Reese, R. and Shogren, J.: 1995, ‘Economic and Resource Impacts of Policies to Increase Organic Carbon in Agricultural Soils’, Soil Management and Greenhouse Effects, [Lal, R., J. Kimble, E. Levine, and B. Stewart, eds.], CRC Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, LA, 309–328.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, Sir J.: 1999, “Using Technology to Transform an Organization”, speech at the NATO Seminar on Technology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, October 18, 1999.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, S.: 1999, Personal correspondence, Winrock International.Google Scholar
  15. Chichilnisky, G. and Heal, G.: 1993, ‘Global Environmental Risk’, Journal of Economics Perspectives, 7, 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crocker, T., Forster, B., and Shogren J.: 1991, ‘Valuing Potential Groundwater Protection Benefits’, Water Resources Research, 27, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crocker, T. and Shogren, J.: 1997, ‘Endogenous Risk and Environmental Program Evaluation’, Environmental Program Evaluation. A Primer. [G. Knaap and T.J. Kim, eds.], University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, pp. 255–269.Google Scholar
  18. Cook, P. and Graham, D.: 1979, ‘The Demand for Insurance and Protection: The Case of Irreplaceable Commodities’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 61, 143–156.Google Scholar
  19. Dawes, R.: 1988. Rational Choice in an Uncertain World, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  20. Dowlatabadi, H. and Morgan, M. G.: 1993, ‘A Model Framework for Integrated Studies of the Climate Problem’, Energy Policy 21, 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ehrlich I. and Becker, G.S.: 1972, ‘Market Insurance, Self-insurance and Self-protection’, Journal of Political Economy, 80, 623–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Falk, I. and Mendelsohn, R.: 1993, ‘The Economics of Controlling Stock Pollutants: An Efficient Strategy for Greenhouse Gases’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 25, 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Graham, J. and Wiener, J.: 1996, Risk vs. Risk, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  24. Hiebert, L.: 1983, ‘Self Insurance, Self Protection, and the Theory of the Firm’, Southern Economic Journal, 50, 160–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huber, S. and Douglass, C.: 1998, Two Perspectives on Global Climate Change. A Briefing Book, Center for the Study of American Business, Washington University of St. Louis.Google Scholar
  26. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): 1996, Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific-Technical Analyses. Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, R. Watson et al., eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  27. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): 1996, Climate Change 1995: Economics and Social Dimensions of Climate Change, The Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [J. Bruce, H. Lee, and E. Haites, eds.]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  28. Jacoby, H., Prinn, R., and Schmalensee, R.: 1998, ‘Kyoto's Unfinished Business’, Foreign Affairs, July/August, 54–66.Google Scholar
  29. Jaffee, A. and Stavins, R.: 1994, ‘The Energy-Efficiency Gap: What Does it Mean?’, Energy Policy, 22, 804–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jempa, C. and Munasinghe, M.: 1997, Climate Change Policy: Facts, Issues and Analyses, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
  31. Kane, S.: 1996, ‘Economics of Climate Change’ in Encyclopedia of Climate and Weather, S.H. Schneider (Editor-in-Chief). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  32. Kane, S., Reilly, J., and Tobey, J.: 1992, ‘An Empirical Study of the Economic Effects of Climate Change on World Agriculture’, Climate Change, 21:17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lewis, T. and Nickerson, P.: 1989, ‘Self-insurance against Natural Disasters’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 16, 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kates, R.: 1978. Risk Assessment of Environmental Hazard. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  35. Kelly, D. and Kolstad, C.: 1996, ‘Bayesian Learning and Accumulation of Stock Externalities’, working paper, Department of Economics, UC-Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  36. Kremer, M.: 1996, ‘Integrating Behavioral Choice into Epidemiological Models of AIDS’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 549–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Laffont, J.-J.: 1980. Essays in the Economics of Uncertainty, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  38. Manne, A. and Richels, R.: 1997, ‘On Stabilizing CO2 Concentrations: Cost-effective Emission Reduction Strategies’, Energy Modeling Forum 14, April.Google Scholar
  39. Marshall, J.: 1976, ‘Moral Hazard’, American Economic Review, 66, 680–690.Google Scholar
  40. Nakicenovic, N., W. Nordhaus, Richels, R. and Toth, F.: 1994. Integrative Assessment of Mitigation Impacts and Adaptation to Climate Change. HASA, Laxenburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  41. National Academy of Sciences: 1999, Global Environmental Change: Research Pathways for the Next Decade, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  42. National Academy of Sciences: 1983, Risk Assessment in the Federal Government Managing the Process, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  43. Nena, J., President of the Federated States of Micronesia: 1998, September 24, Statement to the 53rd United Nations General Assembly, New York.Google Scholar
  44. Nordhaus, W.: 1994. Managing the Global Commons, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  45. Nordhaus, W., and Boyer, J.: 1998, ‘Requiem for Kyoto: An Economic Analysis of the Kyoto Protocol’, Energy Journal, May, 93–130.Google Scholar
  46. Norgaard, R.: 1989, ‘The Case for Methodological Pluralism’, Ecological Economics, 1, 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Parry, M. and Carter, T.: 1998. Climate Impact and Adaptation Assessment: The IPCC Method. Earthscan Publications, London.Google Scholar
  48. Peck, S. and Teisberg, T.: 1996, ‘Uncertainty and the Value of Information with Stochastic Losses From Global Warming’, Risk Analysis, 16, 227–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Plambeck, E., Hope, C., and Anderson, J.: 1997, ‘The [PAGE95] model: Integrating the Science and Economics of Global Warming’, Energy Economics, 19, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Quiggin, J.: 1992, ‘Risk, Self-protection, and Ex Ante Economic Value—Some Positive Results’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 23, 40–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rayner, S. and Malone, E. (eds.): 1998. Human Choice and Climate Change, Battelle, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  52. Reilly, J.: 1999, Personal Correspondence. MIT University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  53. Reilly, J., Hohmann, N., and Kane, S.: 1994, ‘Climate Change and Agricultural Trade: Who Benefits and Who Loses’, Global Environmental Change, 4, 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schelling, T.: 1992, ‘Some Economics of Global Warming’, American Economic Review, 82, 1–14.Google Scholar
  55. Shogren, J.: 1991, ‘Endogenous Risk and Protection Premiums’, Theory and Decision, 31, 241–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shogren, J.: 1999, ‘The Benefits and Costs of the Kyoto Protocol’, AEI Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  57. Shogren, J. and Crocker, T.: 1991a, ‘Risk, Self-Protection, and Ex Ante Economic Value’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 20, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shogren, J. and Crocker, T.: 1991b, ‘Cooperative and Noncooperative Protection Against Transferable and Filterable Externalities,’ Environmental and Resource Economics, 1, 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shogren, J., Tschirhart, J., Anderson, T., Ando, A., Beissinger, S., Brookshire, D., Brown, Jr., G., Coursey, D., Innes, R., Meyer, S., and Polasky S.: 1999, ‘Why Economics Matters for Endangered Species Protection’, Conservation Biology, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  60. Sohngen, B., Mendelsohn, R., and Sedjo, R.: 1999, ‘Forest Management, Conservation, and Global Timber Markets’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R.J.T., and Wandel, J.: 2000, ‘An Anatomy of Adaptation to Climate Change and Variability’, Climatic Change, (this issue).Google Scholar
  62. Swallow, S.: 1996, ‘Resource Capital Theory and Ecosystem Economics: Developing Nonrenewable Habitats with Heterogeneous Quality’, Southern Economic Journal, 63, 106–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: 29 May 1992, 31 I.L.M. 849.Google Scholar
  64. United States Office of Science and Technology Policy, 1999, Our Changing Planet: The FY 2000 US Global Change Research Program, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  65. Victor, D., Raustiala, K., and Skolnikoff, E.: 1998. The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments: Theory and Practice, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  66. Virgi, H.: 1999. Personal correspondence, START Secretariat, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  67. Viscusi, K.V.: 1998. Rational Risk Policy — the Arne Ryde Memorial Lecture Series. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Weyant, J. and Hill, J.: 1999, ‘Introduction and Overview: The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol—A Multi-model Evaluation’ Energy Journal, May:vii–xliv.Google Scholar
  69. Whyte, A. and Burton, I.: 1980, Environmental Risk Assessment, John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  70. Wiener, J.: 1999, ‘Global Environmental Regulation: Instrument Choice in Legal Context’, Yale Law Journal, 108, 677–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wigley, T.: 1998, ‘The Kyoto Protocol: CO2, CH4 and Climate Implications’, Geophysical Research Letters, 25, 2285–2288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wigley, T., Richels, R., and Edmonds, J.: 1996, ‘Economic and Environmental Choices in the Stabilization of Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations’, Nature, 379, 240–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yohe, G.: 1996, ‘Exercises in Hedging Against Extreme Consequences of Global Change and the Expected Value of Information’, Global Environmental Change, 6, 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yohe, G. and Toth, F.: 2000, ‘Adaptation and the Guardrail Approach to Tolerable Climate Change Policy’, Climatic Change, (this issue).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sally Kane
    • 1
  • Jason F. Shogren
    • 2
  1. 1.Office of Global ProgramsNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationSilver SpringUSA
  2. 2.Department of Economics and FinanceUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA

Personalised recommendations