Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 215–236 | Cite as

Accounts for Success as Determinants of Perceived Arrogance and Modesty

  • Shlomo Hareli
  • Bernard Weiner
Article

Abstract

Two factors are assumed to induce impressions of arrogance and modesty in reaction to others' accounts for success: the dimensions underlying the cause for success and the perceived desirability of the cause. Guided by Weiner's attribution theory (B. Weiner, 1986), it was proposed that accounts ascribing success to internal, stable, uncontrollable, and desirable causes represent positive given qualities of a person (e.g., intelligence and beauty) that lead to perceptions of arrogance and lack of modesty. Three vignette experiments measuring subjects' reactions to others' accounts for achievements in school and sports confirmed these predictions. Accounts induce impressions of arrogance and modesty regardless of the level of the achievement. Additionally, arrogance reduces admiration toward the achiever whereas increments in modesty and/or level of success increase it. The present findings provide further evidence of the significance of attributional information for social judgments.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Ben-Ze'ev, A. (1993). On the virtue of modesty. American Philosophical Quarterly, 30, 235–246.Google Scholar
  2. Carlston, D. E., & Shovar, N. (1983). Effects of performance attributions on others' perceptions of the attributor. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 44, 515–525.Google Scholar
  3. Feather, N. T. (1993). The rise and fall of political leaders: Attributions, deservingness, personality, and affect. Australian Journal of Psychology, 45, 61–68.Google Scholar
  4. Feather, N. T. (1994). Attitudes towards high achievers and reactions to their fall: Theory and research concerning tall poppies. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 1–73). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Feather, N. T., Volkmer, R. E., & McKee, I. R. (1991). Attitudes towards high achievers in public life: Attributions, deservingness, personality, and affect. Australian Journal of Psychology, 43, 85–91.Google Scholar
  6. Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Juvonen, J. (1996). Self-presentation tactics promoting teacher and peer approval: The function of excuses and other clever explanations. In J. Juvonen & K. R. Wentzel (Eds.), Social motivation: Understanding children's school adjustment (pp. 43–65). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Kelly, A. E. (2000). Helping construct desirable identities:Aself-presentational viewof psychotherapy. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 475–494.Google Scholar
  9. Levine, R. V., & West, L. J. (1976). Attraction as a function of boasting, self-apology, and credibility as an actor. Psychological Reports, 38, 1243–1246.Google Scholar
  10. Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Robinson, M. D., Johnson, J. T., & Shields, S. A. (1995). On the advantages of modesty: The benefits of a balanced self-presentation. Communication Research, 22, 575–591.Google Scholar
  12. Schlenker, B. R., Dlugolecki, D. W., & Doherty, K. (1994). The impact of self-presentation on selfappraisals and behavior: The power of public commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 20–33.Google Scholar
  13. Schlenker, B. R., & Leary, M. R. (1982). Audiences' reactions to self-enhancing, self-denigrating, and accurate self-presentations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 89–104Google Scholar
  14. Taylor, S. E., & Armor, D. A. (1996). Positive illusions and coping with adversity. Journal of Personality, 64, 873–898.Google Scholar
  15. Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.Google Scholar
  16. Teigen, K. H. (1997). Luck, envy and gratitude: It could have been different. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 38, 313–323.Google Scholar
  17. Tice, D. M., Butler, J. L., Muraven, M. B., & Stillwell, A. M. (1995). When modesty prevails: Differential favorability of self-presentation to friends and strangers. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 69, 1120–1138.Google Scholar
  18. Vallacher, R. R., Wegner, D. M., & Frederick, J. (1987). The presentation of self through action identification. Social Cognition, 5, 301–322.Google Scholar
  19. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 95, 548–573.Google Scholar
  20. Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New-York: Springler-Verlag.Google Scholar
  21. Weiner, B. (1994). Ability versus effort revisited: The moral determinants of achievement evaluation and achievement as a moral system. Educational Psychologist, 29, 163–172.Google Scholar
  22. Weiner, B. (1995a). Inferences of responsibility and social motivation. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 1–47). New-York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. Weiner, B. (1995b). Judgments of responsibility. New-York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  24. Weiner, B., & Kukla, A. (1970). An attributional analysis of achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 1–20.Google Scholar
  25. Weiner, B., Russell, D., & Lerman, D. (1979). The cognition-emotion process in achievement-related contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1211–1220.Google Scholar
  26. Wosinska, W., Dabul, A. J., Whetstone-Dion, R., & Cialdini, R. B. (1996). Self-presentational responses to success in the organization: The costs and benefits of modesty. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 18, 229–242.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shlomo Hareli
    • 1
  • Bernard Weiner
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Interdisciplinary Research on EmotionsUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CaliforniaLos Angeles

Personalised recommendations