International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 143–167 | Cite as

Territory Characteristics among Three Neighboring Chimpanzee Communities in the Taï National Park, Côte d'Ivoire


We studied territory characteristics among three neighboring chimpanzee communities in the Taï National Park, Côte d'Ivoire, and compared them with other chimpanzee populations. We characterized territories and ranging patterns by analyzing six variables:, (1) territory size, (2) overlap zone, (3) territory utilization, (4) core area, (5) territory shift, and (6) travel distance. Data collection covered a period of 10 mo, during which we simultaneously sampled the local positions of mostly large parties, including males in each community, in 30-min intervals. In Taï, chimpanzees used territories in a clumped way, with small central core areas being used preferentially over large peripheral areas. Although overlap zones between study communities mainly represented infrequently visited peripheral areas, overlap zones with all neighboring communities also included intensively used central areas. Territory utilization was not strongly seasonal, with no major shift of activity center or shift of areas used over consecutive months. However, we observed shorter daily travel distances in times of low food availability. Territory sizes of Taï chimpanzees tended to be larger than territories in other chimpanzee communities, presumably because high food availability allows for economical defense of territorial borders and time investment in territorial activities. Therefore we suggest, that use of territory in Taï chimpanzees is strongly influenced by intercommunity relations. To understand differences in territory characteristics between various populations, it is of major importance to consider not only the intracommunity but also the intercommunity context.

chimpanzee territory size territory utilization food availability intercommunity relations 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agetsuma, N. (1995). Foraging strategies of Yakushima Macaques (Macaca fuscata yakui). Int. J. Primatol. 16: 595–609.Google Scholar
  2. Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49: 227–267.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, D. J. (1982). The home range: A new nonparametric estimation technique. Ecology 63: 103–112.Google Scholar
  4. Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual Selection. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, R. R. (1983). Insect territoriality. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 28: 65–89.Google Scholar
  6. Bates, B. C. (1970). Territorial behavior in primates: A review of recent field studies. Primates 11: 271–284.Google Scholar
  7. Boesch, C. (1996). Social grouping in Taï chimpanzees. In McGrew, W. C., Marchant, L. F., and Nishida, T. (eds.), Great Ape Societies, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 101–113.Google Scholar
  8. Boesch, C., and Boesch-Achermann, H. (2000). The Chimpanzees of the Taï Forest: Behavioural Ecology and Evolution, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  9. Bortz, J., Lienert, G. A., and Boehnke, K. (1990). Verteilungsfreie Methoden in der Biostatistik, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 155.Google Scholar
  10. Bradbury, J., and Vehrencamp, S. unpubl. Antelope. vehrenbury/programs.html.Google Scholar
  11. Breder, C. M., Jr. (1934). An experimental study of the reproductive habits and life history of the cichlid fish. Zoologica 18: 1–42.Google Scholar
  12. Burt, W. H. (1943). Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. J. Mammal. 24: 346–352.Google Scholar
  13. Carpenter, C. R. (1934). Behavior of red spider monkeys in Panama. J. Mammal. 16: 171–180.Google Scholar
  14. Chapman, C. A., and Wrangham, R. W. (1993). Range use of the forest chimpanzees of Kibale: Implications for the understanding of chimpanzee social organization. Am. J. Primatol. 31: 263–273.Google Scholar
  15. Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Harvey, P. H. (1977). Species differences in feeding and ranging behaviour in primates. In Clutton-Brock, T. H. (ed.), Primate Ecology: Studies of Feeding and Ranging Behaviour in Lemurs, Monkeys, and Apes, Academic Press, London, pp. 557–584.Google Scholar
  16. Clutton-Brock, T. H., Guinness, F. E., and Albon, S. D. (1982). Red deer: Behavior and Ecology of Two Sexes, Edinburgh Univ. Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  17. Clutton-Brock, T. H., Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, M., and Robertson, A. (1989). Mate choice on fallow deer leks. Nature 340: 463–465.Google Scholar
  18. David, F. N., and Moore, P. G. (1954). Notes on contagious distributions in plant populations. Ann. Bot. 18: 47–53.Google Scholar
  19. De Vore, I., and Hall, K. R. L. (1965). Baboon ecology. In De Vore, I. (ed.), Primate Behaviour: Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, pp. 50–52.Google Scholar
  20. Dixon, K. R., and Chapman, J. A. (1980). Harmonic mean measure of animal activity areas. Ecology 61: 1040–1044.Google Scholar
  21. Doncaster, C. P. (1990). Non-parametric estimates of interaction from radio-tracking data. J. Theor. Biol. 143: 431–443.Google Scholar
  22. Doran, D. (1997). Influence of seasonality on activity patterns, feeding behavior, ranging, and grouping patterns in Taï chimpanzees. Int. J. Primatol. 18: 183–206.Google Scholar
  23. Dunbar, R. I. M. (1988). Primate Social Systems. Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
  24. Eberhard, J. R., and Ewald, P. W. (1994). Food availability, intrusion pressure and territory size: An experimental study of Anna's hummingbird (Calypte anna). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 34: 11–18.Google Scholar
  25. Emlen, S. T., and Oring, L. W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197: 215–223.Google Scholar
  26. Garber, P. A., Pruetz, J. D., and Isaacson, J. (1993). Patterns of range use, range defense, and intergroup spacing in moustached tamarin monkeys (Saguinus mystax). Primates 34: 11–25.Google Scholar
  27. Goné Bi, Z. B. (1999). Phénologie et distribution des plantes dont les fruits sont consommés par les chimpanzés au Parc National de Taï . Unpubl. MSc thesis, Univ. of Cocody, Abidjan.Google Scholar
  28. Goodall, J. (1986). The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge/Mass.Google Scholar
  29. Gordon, K. (1940). Territorial behavior and social dominance among Sciuridae. J. Mammal. 17: 171–172.Google Scholar
  30. Goss-Custard, J. D., Dunbar, R. I. M., and Aldrich-Blake, F. P. G. (1972). Survival, mating and rearing in the evolution of primate social structure. Folia Primatol. 17: 1–19.Google Scholar
  31. Grant, J. W. A., Chapman, C. A., and Richardson, K. S. (1992). Defended versus undefended home range size of carnivores, ungulates and primates. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 31: 149–161.Google Scholar
  32. Green, R. H. (1966). Measurement of non-randomness in spatial distributions. Resear. Popul. Ecol. 8: 1–7.Google Scholar
  33. Greenberg, B., and Noble, G. K. (1942). Dominance, social order and territory in the lizard (Anolis carolinensis). Anat. Rec. 84: 508–509.Google Scholar
  34. Harris, S., Cresswell, W. J., Forde, P. G., Trewhella, W. J., Woollard, T., and Wray S. (1990). Home-range analysis using radio-tracking data-a review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals. Mammel. Rev. 20: 97–123.Google Scholar
  35. Hasegawa, T. (1990). Sex differences in ranging patterns. In Nishida, T. (ed.), The Chimpanzees of the Mahale Mountains, Univ. of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp. 99–114.Google Scholar
  36. Heiduck, S. (1997). Nahrungsstrategien Schwarzköpfiger Springaffen. (Callicebus personatus melanochir). Unpubl. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Göttingen, Göttingen.Google Scholar
  37. Heinsohn, R. (1997). Group territoriality in two populations of African lions. Anim. Behav. 53: 1143–1147.Google Scholar
  38. Holm, C. H. (1973). Breeding sex ratios, territoriality and reproductive success in the red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). Ecology 54: 356–365.Google Scholar
  39. Howard, R. D. (1978). The influence of male-defended oviposition sites on early embryo mortality in bullfrogs. Ecology 59: 789–798.Google Scholar
  40. Jolly, A. (1966). Lemur Behavior. Chicago Univ. Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  41. Jolly, A. (1985). The Evolution of Primate Behavior, 2nd ed. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Jones, G. P. (1981). Spawing-site choice by female Pseudolabrus celidotus (Pisces: Labridae) and its influence on the mating system. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 8: 129–142.Google Scholar
  43. Kaufmann, J. H. (1962). Ecology and social behaviour of the coati, Nasua narica, on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 60: 95–222.Google Scholar
  44. Kawanaka, K. (1984). Association, ranging, and the social unit in chimpanzees of the Mahale Mountains, Tanzania. Int. J. Primatol. 5: 411–434.Google Scholar
  45. Kawanaka, K., and Nishida, T. (1974). Recent advances in the study of inter-unit-group relationships and social structure of wild chimpanzees of the Mahali Mountains. Symp. 5th Cong. Int'l. Primat. Soc., pp. 173–186.Google Scholar
  46. King, J. A. (1955). Social behavior, social organization, and population dynamics in a blacktailed prairie dog town in the Black Hills of South Dakota. Contr. Lab. Vert. Biol. Univ. Mich. 67: 1–123.Google Scholar
  47. Kinnaird, M. F. (1992). Variable resource defense by the Tana River crested mangabey. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 31: 115–122.Google Scholar
  48. Kool, K. M., and Croft, D. B. (1992). Estimators for home range areas of arboreal colobine monkeys. Folia Primatol. 58: 210–214.Google Scholar
  49. Lowen, C., and Dunbar, R. I. M. (1994). Territory size and defendability in primates. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 35: 347–354.Google Scholar
  50. Ludwig, J. A., and Reynolds, J. F. (1988). Statistical Ecology: A Primer on Methods and Computing. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 19–40.Google Scholar
  51. Mason, W. A. (1968). Use of space by Callicebus groups. In Jay, P. C. (ed.), Primates: Studies in Adaptation and Variability, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 200–216.Google Scholar
  52. Mendes Pontes, A. R., and Monteira da Cruz, M. A. O. (1995). Home range, intergroup transfers, and reproductive status of common marmosets Callithrix jacchus in a forest fragment in north-eastern Brazil. Primates 36: 335–347.Google Scholar
  53. Newton, P. (1992). Feeding and ranging patterns of forest Hanuman Langurs (Presbytis entellus). Int. J. Primatol. 13: 245–285.Google Scholar
  54. Nice, M. M. (1941). The role of territory in bird life. Amer. Midland Nat. 26: 441–487.Google Scholar
  55. Nishida, T. (1979). The social structure of chimpanzees in the Mahale Mountains. In Hamburg, D. A., and McCown, E. R. (eds.), The Great Apes, Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park/Calif., pp. 73–122.Google Scholar
  56. Nishida, T. (1990). A quarter century of research in the Mahale Mountains: an overview. In Nishida, T. (ed.), The Chimpanzees of the Mahale Mountains, Univ. of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp. 3–35.Google Scholar
  57. Nishida, T., and Kawanaka, K. (1972). Inter-Unit-Group Relationships among wild chimpanzees of the Mahali Mountains. Kyoto Univ. Afr. Studies 7: 131–169.Google Scholar
  58. Nishida, T., and Uehara, S. (1983). Natural diet of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii): Long-term record from the Mahale Mountains, Tanzania. Afr. Study Monogr. 1: 109–131.Google Scholar
  59. Nishida, T., Takasaki, H., and Takahata, Y. (1990). Demography and reproductive profiles. In Nishida, T. (ed.), The Chimpanzees of the Mahale Mountains, Tokyo Univ. Press, Tokyo, pp. 63–97.Google Scholar
  60. Nishida, T., Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, M., Hasegawa, T., and Takahata, Y. (1985). Group extinction and female transfer in wild chimpanzees in the Mahale National Park, Tanzania. Z. Tierpsychol. 67: 284–301.Google Scholar
  61. Noble, G. K. (1939). The role of dominance in the social life of birds. AUK 56: 263–273.Google Scholar
  62. Olupot, W., Chapman, C. A., Waser, P. M., and Isabirye-Basuta, G. (1997). Mangabey (Cercocebus albigena) ranging patterns in relation to fruit availability and the risk of parasite infection in Kibale National Park, Uganda. Am. J. Primatol. 43: 65–78.Google Scholar
  63. Owen-Smith, R. N. (1977). On territoriality in ungulates and an evolutionary model. Q. Rev. Biol. 52: 1–38.Google Scholar
  64. Peres, C. A. (1989). Costs and benefits of territorial defense in wild golden lion tamarins, (Leontopithecus rosalia). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 25: 227–233.Google Scholar
  65. Rayor, L. S. (1988). Social organization and space-use in Gunnison's prairie dog. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 22: 69–78.Google Scholar
  66. Reichard, U., and Sommer, V. (1997). Group encounters in wild gibbons (Hylobates lar): agonism, affiliation, and the concept of infanticide. Behavior 134: 1135–1174.Google Scholar
  67. Roth, H. H., Mühlenberg, M., Roeben, P., and Barthlott, W. (1979). Gegenwärtiger Status der Comoé-und Taï Nationalparks sowie des Azagny-Reservats und Vorschläge zu deren Erhaltung und Entwicklung zur Förderung des Tourismus. Bd. III: Taï Nationalpark. PN 73.2085.6, FGU Kronberg.Google Scholar
  68. Sakura, O. (1994). Factors affecting party size and composition of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) at Bossou, Guinea. Int. J. Primatol. 15: 167–183.Google Scholar
  69. Schaik, C. P. van, Assink, P. R., and Salafsky, N. (1992). Territorial behavior in southeast asian langurs: resource defense or mate defense? Am. J. Primatol. 26: 233–242.Google Scholar
  70. Severinghaus, L., Kurtak, B. H., and Eickwort, G. C. (1981). The reproductive behavior of Anthidium manicatum (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) and the significance of size for territorial males. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 9: 51–58.Google Scholar
  71. Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W., and Struhsaker, T. T. (1987). Primate Societies. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  72. Sugiyama, Y., and Koman, J. (1992). The flora of Bossou: its utilisation by chimpanzees and humans. Afr. Study Monogr. 13: 127–169.Google Scholar
  73. Suzuki, A. (1979). The variation and adaption of social groups of chimpanzees and black and white colobus. In Bernstein, I., and Smith, E. O. (eds.), Primate Ecology and Human Origins, Garland Press, New York, pp. 153–173.Google Scholar
  74. Todd, I. A. (1992). Wildtrak: Non-parametric home range analysis for Macintosh computers. Dept. of Zoology, Univ. of Oxford, UK, pp. 1–91.Google Scholar
  75. Wallis, J. (1992). Socioenvironmental effects on timing of first postpartum cycles in chimpanzees. In Nishida, T., McGrew, W. C., Marler, P., Pickford, M., and Waal, F. B. M. de (eds.), Topics in Primatology, Vol 1, Human Origins, Univ. of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp. 119–130.Google Scholar
  76. Wallis, J. (1995). Seasonal influence on reproduction in chimpanzees of Gombe National Park. Int. J. Primatol. 16: 435–451.Google Scholar
  77. Woollard, T., and Harris, S. (1990). A behavioural comparison of dispersing and non-dispersing foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and an evaluation of some dispersal hypotheses. J. Anim. Ecol. 59: 709–722.Google Scholar
  78. Wrangham, R. W. (1975). The behavioral ecology of chimpanzees in Gombe National Park, Tanzania, Ph. D. diss., Cambridge University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  79. Wrangham, R. W. (1979). Sex differences in chimpanzee dispersion. In Hamburg, D. A., and McCown, E. R. (eds.), The Great Apes, Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park/Calif., pp. 481–489.Google Scholar
  80. Wrangham, R. W. (1986). Ecology and social relationships in two species of chimpanzees. In Rubenstein, D. I., and Wrangham, R. W. (eds.), Ecology and Social Evolution: Birds and Mammals, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  81. Wrangham, R. W., Chapman, C. A., Clark-Arcadi, A. P., and Isabirye-Basuta, G. (1996). Social ecology of Kanyawara chimpanzees: Implications for understanding the great ape groups. In McGrew, W. C., Marchant, L. F., and Nishida, T. (eds.), Great Ape Societies, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 45–57.Google Scholar
  82. Zhang, S. (1995). Activity and ranging patterns in relation to fruit utilization by brown capuchins (Cebus apella) in French Guiana. Int. J. Primatol. 16: 489–507.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilka Herbinger
    • 1
  • Christophe Boesch
    • 1
  • Hartmut Rothe
    • 2
  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary AnthropologyLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Ethologische Station des Instituts fuer Zoologie und Anthropologieder Universitaet GoettingenGleichen, pGermany

Personalised recommendations