Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 47–54 | Cite as

Inferential Language in High-Function Children with Autism

  • Maureen Dennis
  • Anne L. Lazenby
  • Linda Lockyer
Article

Abstract

Despite average verbal intelligence, high-function children with autism have social comprehension deficits that are expressed by how they use and understand language. In this paper, we explored the general hypothesis that high-function children with autism make some, but not all, of the pragmatic inferences necessary for successful communication, even when they have the ability to perform noninferential language tasks. We contrasted the ability of 8 high-function children with autism (each with Verbal IQ > 70) and typically developing children to use and understand: pragmatic inferences about given or presupposed knowledge in mental state words; pragmatic inferences about new or implied knowledge in mental state words; bridging inferences essential for coherence; elaborative inferences involved in enriching a communication by means of figurative language; and the intentional inferences involved in speech acts. High-function children with autism could define words and identify multiple meanings for ambiguous words. In understanding words for mental states, they made inferences from mental state verbs to given or presupposed knowledge. However, they failed to infer what mental state verbs implied in context; to make inferences about social scripts; to understand metaphor; and to produce speech acts, all of which are inferences that are the basis of successful social communication because they elaborate meaning or convey intentions.

Autism high-function children inferential language 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Abbeduto, A., & Rosenberg, S. (1985). Children's knowledge of the presuppositions of know and other cognitive verbs. Journal of Child Language, 12621-641.Google Scholar
  2. Astington, J. W., & Gopnik, A. (1991). Theoretical explanations of children's understanding of the mind. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 97-31.Google Scholar
  3. Baltaxe, C. A. M. (1977). Pragmatic deficits in the language of autistic adolescents. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 2176-180.Google Scholar
  4. Baron-Cohen, S. (1997). Hey! It was a joke! Understanding propositions and propositional attitudes by normally developing children, and children with autism. Israel Journal of Psychiatry, 34174-178.Google Scholar
  5. Baron-Cohen, S., O'Riordan, M., Stone, V., Jones, R., & Plaisted, K. (1999). Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29407-418.Google Scholar
  6. Baron-Cohen, S., Ring, H., Moriarty, J., Schmitz, B., Costa, D., & Ell, P. (1994). Recognition of mental state terms. Clinical findings in children with autism and a functional neuroimaging study of normal adults. British Journal of Psychology, 165640-649.Google Scholar
  7. Beun, R-J. (1994). Mental state recognition and communicative effects. Journal of Pragmatics, 21191-214.Google Scholar
  8. Booth, J. R., & Hall, W. S. (1994). Relationship of reading comprehension to the cognitive internal state lexicon(Reading Research Report No. 14). Universities of Georgia and Maryland, National Reading Research Center.Google Scholar
  9. Booth, J. R., & Hall, W. S. (1995). Development of the understanding of the polysemous meanings of the mental-state verb know. Cognitive Development, 10529-549.Google Scholar
  10. Booth, J. R., Hall, W. S., Robison, G. C., & Kim, S. Y. (1997). Acquisition of the mental state verb know by 2-and 5-year old children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26581-603.Google Scholar
  11. Capps, L., Kehres, J., & Sigman, M (1998). Conversational abilities among children with autism and children with developmental delays. Autism, 2325-344.Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, D. J., & Volkmar, F. R. (Eds.). (1997). Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders(2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences(Rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dennis, M., Lockyer, L., & Lazenby, A. L. (2000). How high-function children with autism understand real and deceptive emotion. Autism, 4, 371-382.Google Scholar
  15. Dennis, M., Lockyer, L., Lazenby, A. L., Donnelly, R. E. Wilkinson, M., & Schoonheyt, W. (1999). Intelligence patterns among children with high-function autism, phenylketonuria, and childhood head injury. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 295-17.Google Scholar
  16. Fillmore, C. (1968). The case for case. In E. Bach & R. Harms (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory(pp. 1-88). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  17. Frith, V. (1989). Autism: Explaining the enigma.Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Hall, W. S., & Nagy, W. E. (1986). Theoretical issues in the investigation of the words of internal report. In A. Gopnik & M. Gopnik (Eds.), From models to modules: Studies in cognitive science from the McGill Workshops(pp. 26-65). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  19. Hall, W. S., Scholnick, E. K., & Hughes, A. T. (1987). Contextual constraints on usage of cognitive words. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16289-310.Google Scholar
  20. Happé, F. G. E. (1991). The autobiographical writings of three Asperger syndrome adults: Problems of interpretation and implications for theory. In U. Frith (Ed.), Autism and Asperger syndrome(pp. 207-242). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Happé, F. G. E. (1993). Communicative competence and theory of mind: A test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48101-119.Google Scholar
  22. Happé, F. G. E. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters' thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24129-154.Google Scholar
  23. Hopmann, M. R., & Maratsos, M. P. (1978). A developmental study of factivity and negation in complex sentences. Journal of Child Language, 5295-309.Google Scholar
  24. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Jolliffe, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999a). A test of central coherence theory: Linguistic processing in high-functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome: Is local coherence impaired? Cognition, 71149-185.Google Scholar
  26. Jolliffe, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999b). The Strange Stories test: A replication with high functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29395-406.Google Scholar
  27. Karttunen, L. (1971). Implicative verbs. Language, 47340-358.Google Scholar
  28. Kelleher, T. R. (1975). Young children's understanding of presupposition and implication.Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Kempson, R. M. (1975). Presupposition and the delimitation of semantics(Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 15) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kintsch, W. (1994). Text comprehension, memory, and learning. American Psychologist, 49294-303.Google Scholar
  31. Kiparsky, P., & Kiparsky, C. (1970). Fact. In M. Bierwisch & K. Heidolph (Eds.), Progress in linguistics(pp. 143-173). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  32. Klin, A., Volkmar, F. R., Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., & Rourke, B. P. (1995). Validity and neuropsychological characterization of Asperger syndrome: Convergence with nonverbal learning disabilities. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 361127-1140.Google Scholar
  33. Loveland, K. A., McEvoy, R. E., Tunali, B., & Kelley, M. L. (1990). Narrative story telling in autism and Down syndrome. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 89-23.Google Scholar
  34. Loveland, K. A., & Tunali, B. (1991). Social scripts for conversational interactions in autism and Down syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 21177-186.Google Scholar
  35. Mayes, L., Volkmar, F., Hooks, M., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1993). Differentiating pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified from autism and language disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 3279-90.Google Scholar
  36. Minshew, N. J., Goldstein, G., Muenz, L. R., & Payton, J. B. (1992). Neuropsychological functioning in nonmentally retarded autistic individuals. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 14749-761.Google Scholar
  37. Natsopoulos, D. (1987). Processing implications and presuppositions by schoolchildren and adults: A developmental cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16133-164.Google Scholar
  38. Ozonoff, S., & Miller, J. N. (1996). An exploration of right-hemisphere contributions to the pragmatic impairments of autism. Brain and Language, 52411-434.Google Scholar
  39. Ozonoff, S., Pennington, B. F., & Rogers, S. J. (1991). Executive function deficits in high-functioning autistic individuals: Relationship to theory of mind. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 321081-1105.Google Scholar
  40. Phinney, M. (1981). Children's interpretation of negation in complex sentences. In S. L. Tavakolian (Ed.), Language acquisition and linguistic theory(pp. 116-138). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Rutter, M. (1996). Autism research: Prospects and priorities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26257-275.Google Scholar
  42. Scholnick, E. K., & Hall, W. S. (1991). The language of thinking: Metacognitive and conditional words. In. J. P. Byrnes & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Perspectives on language and cognition: Interrelations in development(pp. 397-439). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Schopler, E., & Mesibov, G. (Eds.). (1985). Communication problems in autism.New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  44. Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., & Renner, B. R. (1988). The Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS).Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
  45. Scoville, R. P., & Gordon, A. M. (1980). Children's understanding of factive presuppositions: An experiment and a review. Journal of Child Language, 7381-399.Google Scholar
  46. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Singer, M. S. (1988). A developmental study of children's comprehension of negation in complex sentences involving clauses. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 148189-196.Google Scholar
  48. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance. Communication and cognition(2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  49. Szatmari, P., Tuff, L., Finlayson, M. A. J., & Bartolucci, G. (1990). Asperger's syndrome and autism: Neurocognitive aspects. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 29130-136.Google Scholar
  50. Tager-Flusberg, H. (1992). Autistic children's talk about psychological states: Deficits in the early acquisition of a theory of mind. Child Development, 63161-172.Google Scholar
  51. Tager-Flusberg, H. (1993). What language reveals about the understanding of minds in children with autism. In H. Tager-Flusberg, S. Baron-Cohen, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism(pp. 138-153). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Tager-Flusberg, H. (1995). 'Once upon a ribbit': Stories narrated by autistic children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1345-59.Google Scholar
  53. Tager-Flusberg, H. (1996). Brief report: Current theory and research on language and communication in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26169-172.Google Scholar
  54. Tager-Flusberg, H., & Anderson, M. (1991). The development of contingent discourse ability in autistic children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 321123-1134.Google Scholar
  55. Volkmar, F. R., Klin, A., Siegel, B., Szatmari, P., Lord, C., Campbell, M., Freeman, B. J., Cicchetti, D. V., Rutter, M., Kline, W., Buitelaar, J., Hattab, Y., Fombonne, E., Fuentes, J., Werry, J., Stone, W., Kerbeshian, J., Hoshino, Y., Bregman, J., Loveland, K., Szymanski, L., & Towbin, K. (1994). Field trial for autistic disorders in DSM-IV. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1511361-1367.Google Scholar
  56. Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised.New York: Psychological Corp.Google Scholar
  57. Wechsler, D. (1993). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition.New York: Psychological Corp.Google Scholar
  58. Wellman, H. M., & Johnson, C. N. (1979). Understanding mental processes: A developmental study of “remember” and “forget.” Child Development, 5079-88.Google Scholar
  59. Whitney, P., Ritchie, B. G., & Clark, M. B. (1991). Working memory capacity and the use of elaborative inferences in text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 14133-145.Google Scholar
  60. Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. 1985, Test of Language Competence-Expanded edition technical manualNew York: Psychological Corp.Google Scholar
  61. Wing, L. (1988). The continuum of autistic characteristics. In E. Schopler & G. Mesibov (Eds.), Diagnosis and assessment in autism.New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  62. Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989) Tests of cognitive ability.Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maureen Dennis
    • 1
  • Anne L. Lazenby
    • 1
  • Linda Lockyer
    • 1
  1. 1.The Hospital for Sick ChildrenTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations