Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 537–552 | Cite as

A Comparison of Video Modeling with In Vivo Modeling for Teaching Children with Autism

  • Marjorie H. Charlop-Christy
  • Loc Le
  • Kurt A. Freeman


The present study was designed to compare the effectiveness of video modeling with in vivo modeling for teaching developmental skills to children with autism. A multiple baseline design across five children and within child across the two modeling conditions (video and in vivo) and across tasks was used. Each child was presented two similar tasks from his or her curriculum; one task was used for the video condition, while the other was used for the in vivo condition. Video modeling consisted of each child watching a videotape of models performing the target behavior, whereas in vivo modeling consisted of the children observing live models perform the target behavior. After the observations, children were tested for acquisition and generalization of target behaviors. Results suggest that video modeling led to faster acquisition of tasks than in vivo modeling and was effective in promoting generalization. Results are discussed in terms of video modeling's motivating and attention maintaining qualities.

Comparison of video and in vivo modeling autism 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1965). Influence of models' reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of imitative responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 589-595.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 575-582.Google Scholar
  4. Buffington, D. M., Krantz, P. J., McClannahan, L. E., & Poulson, C. L. (1998). Procedures for teaching appropriate gestural communication skills to children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 28, 535-545.Google Scholar
  5. Cantor, J. H., & Cantor, G. N. (1964). Observing behavior in children as a function of stimulus novelty. Child Development, 35, 119-128.Google Scholar
  6. Charlop, M. H., & Milstein, J. P. (1989). Teaching autistic children conversational speech using video modeling. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 275-285.Google Scholar
  7. Charlop-Christy, M. H. (1993). Using video modeling with autistic children. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Northern California Association for Behavior Analysis, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  8. Charlop-Christy, M. H. (1994). New procedures for treating the severe behavior problems of autistic children. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Behavior Analysis and Therapy/Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  9. Charlop-Christy, M. H., & Kelso, S. E. (1997). How to treat the child with autism: A guide to treatment at the Claremont Autism Center. Claremont, CA: Claremont Autism Center.Google Scholar
  10. Charlop-Christy, M. H., Schreibman, L., Pierce, K., Kurtz, P. F. (1998). Childhood autism. In R. Morris & T. R. Kratochwill (Eds.), The practice of child therapy (3rd ed., pp. 271-302). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  11. Charlop, M. H., Schreibman, L., & Tryon, A. S. (1983). Learning through observation: The effects of peer modeling on acquisition and generalization in autistic children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 11, 355-366.Google Scholar
  12. Daehler, M. W., & Bukatko, D. (1977). Recognition memory for pictures in very young children: Evidence from attentional preferences using a continuous presentation procedure. Child Development, 48, 693-696.Google Scholar
  13. Dowrick, P. W. (1986). Social survival for children: A trainer's resource book. New York: Brunner & Mazel.Google Scholar
  14. Dowrick, P. W. (1991). Practical guide to using video in the behavioral sciences. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Dowrick, P. W. (1999). A review of self modeling and related interventions. Applied & Preventive Psychology, 8, 23-39.Google Scholar
  16. Dowrick, P. W., & Dove, C. (1980). The use of self-modeling to improve the swimming performance of spina bifida children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 51-56.Google Scholar
  17. Dowrick, P. W., & Hood, M. (1981). Comparison of self-modeling and small cash incentives in a sheltered workshop. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 394-397.Google Scholar
  18. Dowrick, P. W., & Raeburn, J. M. (1977). Video editing and medication to produce a therapeutic self model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 1156-1158.Google Scholar
  19. Dowrick, P. W., & Raeburn, J. M. (1995). Self-modeling: Rapid skill training for children with physical disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 7, 25-37.Google Scholar
  20. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  21. Egel, A. L., Richman, G. S., & Koegel, R. L. (1981). Normal peer models and autistic children's learning. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 3-12.Google Scholar
  22. Fantz, R. L. (1964). Visual experience in infants: Decreases in attention to familiar patterns relative to novel ones. Science, 146, 668-670.Google Scholar
  23. Haring, T. G., Kennedy, C. H., Adams, M. J., & Pitts-Conway, V. (1987). Teaching generalization of purchasing skills across community settings to autistic youth using videotape modeling. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 89-96.Google Scholar
  24. Hersen, M. (1990). Single-case experimental designs. In A. S. Bellack (Ed.), International handbook of behavior modification and therapy (2nd ed., pp. 175-210). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hosford, R. E. (1980). Self-as-a-model: A cognitive social learning technique. Counseling Psychologist, 9, 45-62.Google Scholar
  26. Hutt, C. (1975). Degrees of novelty and their effects of children's attention and preference. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 487-492.Google Scholar
  27. Ihrig, K., & Wolchik, S. A. (1988). Peer versus adult models and autistic children's learning: Acquisition, generalization, and maintenance. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 67-79.Google Scholar
  28. Levine, M. L. (1986). The Leiter International Performance Scale: Handbook. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
  29. Lovaas, O. I., Koegel, R. L., & Schreibman, L. (1979). Stimulus overselectivity in autism: A review of the research. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 1236-1254.Google Scholar
  30. McGee, G. G., Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (1985). The facilitative effects of incidental teaching on preposition use by autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 17-31.Google Scholar
  31. Mecham, M. J. (1971). Verbal Language Development Scale. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  32. Meltzoff, A. N. (1996). Understanding the intentions of others: Reenactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Annual Progress in Child Psychiatry and Child Development, pp. 67-98.Google Scholar
  33. Puca, R. M., & Schmalt, H. D. (1999). Task enjoyment: A mediator between achievement motives and performance. Motivation & Emotion, 23, 15-29.Google Scholar
  34. Rimland, B. (1968). On the objective diagnosis of infantile autism. Acta Paedopsychiatrica, 35, 146-160.Google Scholar
  35. Schreibman, L. (1975). Effects of within-stimulus and extra-stimulus prompting on discrimination learning in autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 91-112.Google Scholar
  36. Schreibman, L. (1988). Autism. Newberry Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Schreibman, L., & Charlop, M. H. (1981). S??versus S??fading in prompting procedures with autistic children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 508-520.Google Scholar
  38. Schreibman, L., Charlop, M. H., & Koegel, R. L. (1982). Teaching autistic children to use extra-stimulus prompts. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 475-491.Google Scholar
  39. Schreibman, L., Koegel, L. K., & Koegel, R. L. (1989). Autism. In M. Hersen (Ed.), Innovations in child behavior therapy. Springer series on behavior therapy & behavioral medicine (pp. 395-428). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Schreibman, L., & Lovaas, O. I. (1973). Overselective response to social stimuli by autistic children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1, 152-168.Google Scholar
  41. Sparrow, S. S., Ball, D. A., & Cicchetti, D. (1984). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales: Expanded form manual, interview addition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  42. Stephens, W. E., & Ludy, I. E. (1975). Action-concept learning in retarded children using photographic slides, motion picture sequences, and live demonstrations. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 80, 277-280.Google Scholar
  43. Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349-367.Google Scholar
  44. Sulzer-Azaroff, B., & Mayer, G. R. (1991). Behavior analysis for lasting change. San Francisco, CA: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  45. Thelen, M. H., Fry, R. A., Fehrenbach, P. A., & Frautschi, N. M. (1979). Therapeutic videotape and film modeling: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 701-720.Google Scholar
  46. Truglio, R. T., Murphy, K. C., Oppenheimer, S., Aletha, H. C., Wright, J. C. (1996). Predictors of children's entertainment television viewing: Why are they tuning in? Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 17, 475-493.Google Scholar
  47. Tryon, A. S., & Keane, S. P. (1986). Promoting imitative play through generalized observational learning in autisticlike children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 14, 537-549.Google Scholar
  48. Varni, J. W., Lovaas, O. I., Koegel, R. L., & Everett, N. L. (1979). An analysis of observational learning in autistic and normal children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 7, 31-43.Google Scholar
  49. Wechsler, D. (1989). The Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.Google Scholar
  50. Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement-Revised. Allen, TX: DLM.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marjorie H. Charlop-Christy
    • 1
  • Loc Le
    • 2
  • Kurt A. Freeman
    • 1
  1. 1.Claremont McKenna CollegeClaremont
  2. 2.Claremont Graduate UniversityClaremont

Personalised recommendations