Erkenntnis

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 253–279 | Cite as

Carnap, the Ramsey-Sentence and Realistic Empiricism

  • Stathis Psillos
Article

Abstract

Based on archival material from the Carnap and FeiglArchives, this paper re-examines Carnap's approach tothe issue of scientific realism in the 1950s and theearly 1960s. It focuses on Carnap's re-invention ofthe Ramsey-sentence approach to scientific theoriesand argues that Carnap wanted to entertain a genuineneutral stance in the realism-instrumentalism debate.Following Grover Maxwell, it claims that Carnap'sposition may be best understood as a version of`structural realism'. However, thus understood,Carnap's position faces the challenge that Newmanraised against Russell's structuralism: the claim thatthe knowledge of the unobservable is limited to itspurely structural characteristics is eitheruninformative or unsustainable.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Carnap, R.: 1946[1949], 'The Two Concepts of Probability', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 5, reprinted in H. Feigl and W. Sellars (eds), Reading in Philosophical Analysis, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc., pp. 330-348.Google Scholar
  2. Carnap, R.: 1947[1956], Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic, Third Enlarged Edition 1956, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL.Google Scholar
  3. Carnap, R.: 1950[1956], 'Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology', Revue Intérnationale de Philosophie 4, 20-040, reprinted in Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantic and Modal Logic, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL.Google Scholar
  4. Carnap, R.: 1956, 'The Methodological Character of Theoretical Concepts', in H. Feigl and M. Scriven (eds.), The Foundations of Science and the Concepts of Psychology and Psychoanalysis, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 1, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 38-76.Google Scholar
  5. Carnap, R.: 1958, 'Observation Language and Theoretical Language', in J. Hintikka (ed.), Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist (1975), Reidel, Dordrecht-translation of 'Beobachtungssprache und Theoretische Sprache', Dialectica 12, 236-248.Google Scholar
  6. Carnap, R.: 1961, 'On the Use of Hilbert's -Operator in Scientific Theories', in Y. Bar-Hillel et al. (eds), Essays on the Foundations of Mathematics, The Magnes Press, Jerusalem, pp. 156-164.Google Scholar
  7. Carnap, R.: 1963, 'Replies and Systematic Expositions', in P. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Open Court, La Salle IL, pp. 859-1013.Google Scholar
  8. Carnap, R.: 1966, Philosophical Foundations of Physics, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Carnap, R.: 1974, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Creath, R.: 1985, 'Carnap's Scientific Realism: Irenic or Ironic?', in N. Rescher (ed.), The Heritage of Logical Positivism, University of America Press, Lanham.Google Scholar
  11. Demopoulos, W. and Friedman, M.: 1985, 'Critical Notice: Bertrand Russell's The Analysis ofMatter: its Historical Context and Contemporary Interest', Philosophy of Science 52, 621-639.Google Scholar
  12. Feigl, H.: 1943[1949], 'Logical Empiricism', in D. D. Runes (ed.), Twentieth Century Philosophy, Philosophical Library, New York-reprinted in H. Feigl and W. Sellars (eds), Reading in Philosophical Analysis, Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc., New York, pp. 3-26.Google Scholar
  13. Feigl, H.: 1950, 'Existential Hypotheses: Realistic versus Phenomenalistic Interpretations', Philosophy of Science 17, 35-62.Google Scholar
  14. Horwich, P.: 1982, 'How to Choose Between Empirically Indistinguishable Theories', Journal of Philosophy 79, 61-77.Google Scholar
  15. Lewis, D.: 1970, 'How to Define Theoretical Terms', Journal of Philosophy 67, 427-446.Google Scholar
  16. Lewis, D.: 1984, 'Putnam's Paradox', Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62, 221-236.Google Scholar
  17. Maxwell, G.: 1962, 'Theories, Frameworks, and Ontology', Philosophy of Science 29, 132-138.Google Scholar
  18. Maxwell, G.: 1970, 'Theories, Perception and Structural Realism', in R. Colodny (ed.), The Nature and Function of Scientific Theories, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 3-34.Google Scholar
  19. Maxwell, G.: 1970a, 'Structural Realism and the Meaning of Theoretical Terms', in Analyses of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 4, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 181-192.Google Scholar
  20. Newman, M. H. A.: 1928, 'Mr. Russell's “Causal Theory of Perception”', Mind 37, 137-148.Google Scholar
  21. Parrini, P.: 1994, 'With Carnap, Beyond Carnap: Metaphysics, Science, and the Realism/Instrumentalism Controversy', in W. Salmon and G. Wolters (eds), Logic, Language and the Structure of Scientific Theories, University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 255-277.Google Scholar
  22. Psillos, S.: 1999, 'An Introduction to Carnap's “Theoretical Concepts in Science”', (together with the hitherto unpublished lecture by Carnap: “Theoretical Concepts in Science”), Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 40, (4).Google Scholar
  23. Quine, W. V.: 1966, 'Carnap's Views on Ontology', in The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
  24. Quine, W. V.: 1985, 'Carnap's Positivistic Travail', Fundamenta Scientiae 5, 325-333.Google Scholar
  25. Ramsey F.: 1929, 'Theories', in R. B. Braithwaite (ed.), The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Essays 1931, RKP.Google Scholar
  26. Ramsey F.: 1991, 'Notes on Theories', in F. Ramsey Notes on Philosophy, Probability and Mathematics, M. C. Galavotti (ed.), Bibliopolis, pp. 228-236.Google Scholar
  27. Russell, B.: 1927, The Analysis of Matter, RKP.Google Scholar
  28. Salmon, W.: 1994a, 'Carnap, Hempel and Reichenbach on Scientific Realism', in W. Salmon and G. Wolters (eds), Logic, Language and the Structure of Scientific Theories, University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 237-254.Google Scholar
  29. Salmon, W.: 1994b, 'Comment: Carnap on Realism', in W. Salmon and G. Wolters (eds), Logic, Language and the Structure of Scientific Theories, University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 279-286.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stathis Psillos
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and History of ScienceUniversity of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations