Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 485–503 | Cite as

Producing Family Time: Practices of Leisure Activity Beyond the Home

  • Marjorie L. DeVault

Abstract

Family life is conducted in public as well as at home, but the public aspect of family activity is seldom studied (a pattern that tends to reproduce “privatized” notions of family life). This observational study examines one site for public family activity, the community zoo. I show that visiting the zoo involves the group in a routinized activity that reinforces significant social boundaries, including those of family membership. Conceptually, the analysis identifies parental work practices—based on mostly implicit ideologies of family life—whose skills are treated at some moments as unremarkable and in other circumstances as key signifiers of “good parenting.” My aim is to bring into view the settings and circumstances within which parents pursue such activities with children, thereby illustrating an analytic approach that locates these practices within a broader social landscape.

family public space leisure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Adler, P. A. and P. Adler. (1994). Observational techniques. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 377–92). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Brooks Gardner, C. (1995). Passing by: Gender and public harassment. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, M.L. (1998). Institutional ethnography and experience as data. Qualitative Sociology, 21, 55–73.Google Scholar
  4. Carrington, C. (1999). No place like home: Relationships and family life among lesbians and gay men. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Daly, K.J. (1998). “Deconstructing family time: From ideology to lived experience.” Paper presented at Alfred P. Sloan Foundation/BPW Conference “Work and Family: Today's Realities and Tomorrow's Visions,” Boston, November 6–7.Google Scholar
  6. DeVault, M.L. (1991). Feeding the family: The social organization of caring as gendered work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. ————.(1999). Liberating method: Feminism and social research. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Di Leonardo, M. (1987). “The female world of cards and holidays: Women, families, and the work of kinship.” Signs 12: 440–53.Google Scholar
  8. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Gottdiener, M. (1997). The theming of America: Dreams, visions, and commercial spaces. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  11. Griffith, A.I. and Smith, D.E. (1987). Constructing cultural knowledge: Mothering as discourse. In J. Gaskell and A. McLaren (Eds.), Women and education: A Canadian Perspective (pp. 87–103). Calgary, Alberta: Detselig.Google Scholar
  12. Gubrium, J. F. and J.A. Holstein. (1990). What is family? Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  13. Hochschild, A.R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. ————. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
  15. Katz, J. (1996). Families and funny mirrors:Astudy of the social construction and personal embodiment of humor. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 1194–1237.Google Scholar
  16. Lofland, L.H. (1973). A world of strangers: Order and action in urban public space. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Mullen, B. and G. Marvin. (1999). Zoo culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  18. Olszewska, A. and K. Roberts (Eds.). (1989). Leisure and life-style: A comparative analysis of free time. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Rapp, R. (1982). Family and class in contemporary America: Notes toward an understanding of ideology. In B. Thorne with M. Yalom (Eds.), Rethinking the Family (pp. 168–187). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  20. Ritvo, H. (1987). The animal estate: The English and other creatures in the Victorian Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Schor, J.B. (1992). The overworked American: The unexpected decline of leisure. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Seery, B.L. (1996). Four types of mothering emotion work: Distress management, ego work, relationship management, and pleasure/enjoyment work. Ph.D. dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  23. Smith, D.E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  24. ————. (1993). The standard North American family: SNAF as an ideological code. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 50–65.Google Scholar
  25. Smith, D.E. and A.I. Griffith. (1990). Coordinating the uncoordinated: Mothering, schooling, and social class. In G. Miller and J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Perspectives on Social Problems: A Research Annual, Vol. 2 (pp. 25–42). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  26. Wimbush, E. and M. Talbot (Eds.). (1988). Relative freedoms: Women and leisure. Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marjorie L. DeVault
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologySyracuse UniversitySyracuse

Personalised recommendations