Advertisement

Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 293–309 | Cite as

The Relative Efficacy of Three Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment Approaches to Temporomandibular Disorders

  • Kiran D. Mishra
  • Robert J. Gatchel
  • Margaret A. Gardea
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative efficacy of different biopsychosocial treatment conditions on patients with chronic temporomandibular disorder. Ninety-four patients with chronic temporomandibular disorder were assigned to either a biofeedback treatment group, a cognitive-behavioral skills training (CBST) treatment group, a combined (combination of biofeedback/CBST) treatment group, or a no-treatment control group. Pain scores were analyzed pretreatment and posttreatment to determine group and within-subjects treatment effects. Results demonstrated that, in terms of a self-reported pain score, all three treatment groups had significantly decreased pain scores from pretreatment to posttreatment, while the no-treatment group did not. Moreover, patients in the biofeedback group were the most significantly improved compared to the no-treatment group. Finally, participants in the three treatment groups displayed significant improvement in mood states.

temporomandibular disorder biopsychosocial perspective cognitive-behavioral skills training biofeedback RDC/TMD diagnosis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Carlsson, S. G., and Gale, E. N. (1977). Biofeedback in the treatment of long-term temporomandibular joint pain. Biofeed. Self-Regul. 2: 161-171.Google Scholar
  2. Carlsson, S. G., Gale, E. N., and Ohman, A. (1975). Treatment of temporomandibular joint syndrome with biofeedback training. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 91: 602-605.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analyses for the Behavioral Sciences, Hive and Landen, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  4. Dahlstrom, L., Carlsson, G. E., and Carlsson, S.G. (1982). Comparison of effects of electromyographic biofeedback and occlusal splint therapy on mandibular dysfunction. Scand. J. Dent. Res. 90: 151-156.Google Scholar
  5. Dohrmann, R. J., and Laskin, D. M. (1978). An evaluation of electromyographic biofeedback in the treatment of myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 96: 656-662.Google Scholar
  6. Duckro, P. N., Tait, R. C., Margolis, R. B., and Deshields, T. L. (1990). Prevalence of temporomandibular symptoms in a large United States metropolitan area. J. Craniomandib. Pract. 8: 131-138.Google Scholar
  7. Dworkin, S. F. (1994). Temporomandibular disorders and chronic pain: Disease or illness? J. Prosthet. Dent. 72: 29-38.Google Scholar
  8. Dworkin, S. F., and LeResche, L. (1992). Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. J. Craniomandib. Disord. Fac. Oral Pain 6: 301-355.Google Scholar
  9. Dworkin, S. F., Von Korff, M. R., and LeResche, L. (1990). Multiple pains and psychiatric disturbance: An epidemiologic investigation. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 47: 239-244.Google Scholar
  10. Eichman, W. J. (1978). The Profile of Mood States. In Buros, O. K. (ed.), The Eighth Mental Measurements Yearbook, Gryphon, Highland Park, NJ, pp. 1016-1018.Google Scholar
  11. Fernandez, E., and Turk, D. C. (1989). The utility of cognitive coping strategies for altering pain perception: A meta-analysis. Pain 38: 123-135.Google Scholar
  12. Flor, H., and Birbaumer, N. (1993). Comparison of the efficacy of electromyographic biofeedback, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and conservative medical interventions in the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 61: 653-658.Google Scholar
  13. Gessel, A. H. (1975). Electromyographic biofeedback and tricyclic antidepressants in myofascial pain-dysfunction: Psychological predictors of outcome. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 91: 1048-1052.Google Scholar
  14. Glaros, A. G., and Glass, E. G. (1993). Temporomandibular disorders. In Gatchel, R. J., and Blanchard, E. B. (eds.), Psychophysiological disorders, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  15. Helkimo, M. (1979). Epidemiological surveys of dysfunction of the masticatory system. In Zarb, G. A., and Carlsson, G. E. (eds.), Temporomandibular Joint Function and Dysfunction, Munksgaard, Copenhagen, pp. 175-201.Google Scholar
  16. Kight, M., Gatchel, R. J., and Wesley, L. (1999). Temporomandibular disorders: An example of the interface between psychological and physical diagnoses. Health Psychol. 18: 177-182.Google Scholar
  17. Lachin, J. M., Matts, J. P., and Wei, L. J. (1988). Randomization in clinical trials: Conclusions and recommendations. Control. Clin. Trials 9(4): 365-374.Google Scholar
  18. Lewinsohn, P. M., Antonuccio, D. O., Breckenridge, J. S., and Teri, L. (1984). The Coping with Depression Course: A psychoeducational Intervention for Unipolar Depression, Castalia, Eugene, OR.Google Scholar
  19. Lewinsohn, P. M., Munoz, R. F., Youngren, M. A., and Zeiss, A. M. (1986). Control Your Depression, Simon & Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
  20. McNair, D. M., Lorr, M., and Dropelman, L. F. (1981). Profile of Mood States, Educational and Testing Service, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  21. O'Leary, K. D., and Borkovec, T. D. (1978). Conceptual, methodological, and ethical problems of placebo groups in psychotherapy research. Am. Psychol. 56: 821-830.Google Scholar
  22. Penn, N. E., Kar, S., Kramer, J., Skinner, J., and Zambrana, R. E. (1995). Panel VI: Ethnic minorities, health care systems, and behavior. Health Psychol. 14(7): 641-646.Google Scholar
  23. Peterson, R. A., and Headen, S.W. (1984). Profile ofMoodStates. InKeyser, D. J., and Sweetland, R. C. (eds.), Test Critiques, 1, Test Corporation of America, Kansas City, pp. 522-529.Google Scholar
  24. Reider, C. E., Martinoff, J. T., and Wilcox, S. A. (1983). The prevalence of mandibular dysfunction. Part I: Sex and age distribution of related signs and symptoms. J. Prosthet. Dent. 50: 81-88.Google Scholar
  25. Stout, R. L., Wirtz, P. W., Carbonari, J. P., and Del Boca, F. K. (1994). Ensuring balanced distribution of prognostic factors in treatment outcome research. J. Stud. Alcohol 12(Suppl.): 70-75.Google Scholar
  26. Turk, D. C. (1997). Psychosocial and behavioral assessment of patients with temporomandibular disorders: Diagnostic and treatment implications. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 83: 65-71.Google Scholar
  27. Weckowicz, T. E. (1978). Profile of Mood States. In Buros, O. K. (ed.), The Eighth Mental Measurements Yearbook, Gryphon, Highland Park, NJ, pp. 1018-1019.Google Scholar
  28. Wei, L. J., and Lachin, J. M. (1988). Properties of the urn randomization in clinical trials. Control. Clin. Trials 9(4): 345-364.Google Scholar
  29. Widmer, C.G., Huggins, K. H., and Friction, J. (1992). Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. Part III: Examinations and history data collection. J. Craniomandib. Disord. Facial Oral Pain 6(4): 335-355.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kiran D. Mishra
    • 1
  • Robert J. Gatchel
    • 1
  • Margaret A. Gardea
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry, Division of PsychologyThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at DallasDallas

Personalised recommendations