Erkenntnis

, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 633–648 | Cite as

Mind and Function in Animal Communication

  • Daisie Radner
Article

Abstract

Functional hypotheses about animal signalling often refer to mental states of the sender or the receiver. Mental states are functional categorizations of neurophysiological states. Functional questions about animal signals are intertwined with causal questions. This interrelationship is illustrated in regard to avian distraction displays. In purposive signalling, the sender has a goal of influencing the behavior of the receiver. Purposive signalling is innovative if the sender's goal is unrelated to the biological function of the signal. This may be the case in some instances of false alarm calling. Biological functionalism differs from philosophical functionalism in its concept of identity and in the specification of relevant inputs and outputs.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Armstrong, E. A.: 1947, Bird Display and Behaviour, 2nd edn. Lindsay Drummond, London.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, E. A.: 1956, ‘Distraction Display and the Human Predator’, Ibis 98, 641-654.Google Scholar
  3. Baylis, J. R.: 1982, ‘Avian Vocal Mimicry: Its Function and Evolution’, in D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller (eds.), Acoustic Communication in Birds, Vol. 2. Academic Press, New York, pp. 51-83.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, R. G. B.: 1962, ‘The Aggressive and Distraction Behaviour of the Western Sandpiper Ereunetes mauri’, Ibis 104, 1-12.Google Scholar
  5. Caro, T. M.: 1986, ‘The Functions of Stotting: A Review of Hypotheses’, Animal Behaviour 34, 649-662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Curio, E.: 1978, ‘The Adaptive Significance of Avian Mobbing, I: Teleonomic Hypotheses and Predictions’, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 48, 175-183.Google Scholar
  7. Dawkins, R. and J. R. Krebs: 1978, ‘Animal Signals: Information or Manipulation?’ in J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies (eds.), Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp. 282-309.Google Scholar
  8. Dennett, D. C.: 1991, Consciousness Explained, Little, Brown, Boston.Google Scholar
  9. Dewsbury, D. A.: 1992, ‘On the Problems Studied in Ethology, Comparative Psychology, and Animal Behavior’, Ethology 92, 89-107.Google Scholar
  10. Dobkin, D. S.: 1979, ‘Functional and Evolutionary Relationships of Vocal Copying Phenomena in Birds’, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 50, 348-363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fisher, J., and Hinde, R. A.: 1949, ‘The Opening of Milk Bottles by Birds’, British Birds 47, 347-357.Google Scholar
  12. Flasskamp, A.: 1994, ‘The Adaptive Significance of Avian Mobbing, V: An Experimental Test of the “Move On” Hypothesis’, Ethology 96, 322-333.Google Scholar
  13. Frankenberg, E.: 1981, ‘The Adaptive Significance of Avian Mobbing, IV: “Alerting Others” and “Perception Advertisement” in Blackbirds Facing an Owl’, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 55, 97-118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gochfeld, M.: 1984, ‘Antipredator Behavior: Aggressive and Distraction Displays of Shorebirds’, in J. Burger and B. L. Olla (eds.), Shorebirds: Breeding Behavior and Populations. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 289-377.Google Scholar
  15. Green S. and P. Marler: 1979, ‘The Analysis of Animal Communication’, in P. Marler and J. G. Vandenbergh (eds.), Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology, Vol. 3: Social Behavior and Communication. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 73-158.Google Scholar
  16. Hinde, R. A.: 1975, ‘The Concept of Function’, in G. Baerends, C. Beer and A. Manning (eds.), Function and Evolution in Behaviour. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 3-15.Google Scholar
  17. Hogstad, O.: 1995, ‘Alarm Calling by Willow Tits, Parus montanus, as Mate Investment’, Animal Behaviour 49, 221-225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holley, A. J. F.: 1993, ‘Do Brown Hares Signal to Foxes?’, Ethology 94, 21-30.Google Scholar
  19. Howard, R. D.: 1974, ‘The Influence of Sexual Selection and Interspecific Competition on Mockingbird Song (Mimus polyglottos)’, Evolution 28, 428-438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Klump, G. M. and Shalter, M. D.: 1984, ‘Acoustic Behaviour of Birds and Mammals in the Predator Context, I: Factors Affecting the Structure of Alarm Signals; II: The Functional Significance and Evolution of Alarm Signals,’ Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 66, 189-226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krebs, J.: 1977, ‘The Significance of Song Repertoires: The Beau Geste Hypothesis’, Animal Behaviour 25, 475-478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lorenz, K.: 1970, ‘The Establishment of the Instinct Concept (1937)’, in R. Martin (trans.), Studies in Animal and Human Behaviour, Vol. 1. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 259-315.Google Scholar
  23. Lorenz, K.: 1974, ‘Analogy as a Source of Knowledge’, Science 185, 229-234.Google Scholar
  24. Lorenz, K.: 1991, Here am I — Where are You? The Behavior of the Greylag Goose, R. D. Martin (trans.). Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Lorenz, K.: 1996, The Natural Science of the Human Species: An Introduction to Comparative Behavioral Research. The “Russian Manuscript” (1944–1948), A. von Cranach (ed.); R. D. Martin (trans.). MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  26. Matsouka, S.: 1980, ‘Pseudo Warning Call in Titmice’, Tori 29, 87-90.Google Scholar
  27. Maynard Smith, J.: 1982, ‘Do Animals Convey Information about their Intentions?’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 97, 1-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maynard Smith, J.: 1990, ‘Explanation in Biology’, Philosophy (Supplement) 27, 65-72.Google Scholar
  29. Mitchell, S. D.: 1993, ‘Dispositions or Etiologies? A Comment on Bigelow and Pargetter’, Journal of Philosophy 90, 249-259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Møller, A. P.: 1988, ‘False Alarm Calls as a Means of Resource Usurpation in the Great Tit, Parus major’, Ethology 79, 25-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Munn, C. A.: 1986, ‘Birds that “Cry Wolf”,’ Nature 319, 143-145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Popp, J.W.: 1987a, ‘Risk and Effectiveness in the Use of Agonistic Displays by American Goldfinches’, Behaviour 103, 141-156.Google Scholar
  33. Popp, J. W.: 1987b, ‘Agonistic Communication among Wintering Purple Finches’, Wilson Bulletin 99, 97-100.Google Scholar
  34. Radner, D.: 1993, ‘Directed Action and Animal Communication’, Ratio 6, 135-154.Google Scholar
  35. Radner, D. and Radner, M.: 1995, ‘Cognition, Natural Selection and the Intentional Stance,’ International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9, 109-119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ristau, C. A.: 1991, ‘Aspects of the Cognitive Ethology of an Injury-Feigning Bird, the Piping Plover’, in C. A. Ristau (ed.), Cognitive Ethology: The Minds of Other Animals. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 91-126.Google Scholar
  37. Rowley, I.: 1962, ‘“Rodent-Run” Distraction Display by a Passerine, the Superb Blue Wren Malurus cyaneus (L.)’, Behaviour 19, 170-176.Google Scholar
  38. Simmons, K. E. L.: 1955, ‘The Nature of the Predator — Reactions of Waders towards Humans; with Special Reference to the Role of the Aggressive-, Escape-and Brooding-Drives’, Behaviour 8, 130-173.Google Scholar
  39. Sullivan, K.: 1985, ‘Selective Alarm Calling by Downy Woodpeckers in Mixed-Species Flocks’, Auk 102, 184-187.Google Scholar
  40. Tinbergen, N.: 1956, ‘On the Functions of Territory in Gulls’, Ibis 98, 401-411.Google Scholar
  41. Tinbergen, N.: 1963, ‘On Aims and Methods of Ethology’, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 20, 410-433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tramer, E. J.: 1994, ‘Feeder Access: Deceptive Use of Alarm Calls by a White-breasted Nuthatch’, Wilson Bulletin 106, 573.Google Scholar
  43. Wickler, W.: 1968, Mimicry in Plants and Animals R. D. Martin (trans.). McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  44. Witkin, S. R. M. S. and Ficken: 1979, ‘Chickadee Alarm Calls: Does Mate Investment Pay Dividends?’, Animal behaviour 27, 1275-1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wright, L.: 1973, ‘Functions’, Philosophical Review 82, 139-168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daisie Radner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyState University of New YorkBuffaloU.S.A

Personalised recommendations