John Leslie presents a thought experiment to show that chances are sometimes observer-relative in a paradoxical way. The pivotal assumption in his argument – a version of the weak anthropic principle – is the same as the one used to get the disturbing Doomsday argument off the ground. I show that Leslie's thought experiment trades on the sense/reference ambiguity and is fallacious. I then describe a related case where chances are observer-relative in an interesting way. But not in a paradoxical way. The result can be generalized: At least for a very wide range of cases, the weak anthropic principle does not giverise to paradoxical observer-relative chances. This finding could be taken to give new indirect support to the doomsday argument.
KeywordsThought Experiment Related Case Indirect Support Anthropic Principle Experiment Trade
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Barrow, J. D. and F. J. Tipler: 1986, The Anthropic Cosmological Principle, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Bostrom, N.: 1999, 'The Doomsday Argument is Alive and Kicking', Mind 108, 539-50.Google Scholar
- Carter, B.: 1993, 'The Anthropic Selection Principle and the Ultra-Darwinian Evolution', in F. Bertola and U. Curi (eds.), The Anthropic Principle, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 38-63.Google Scholar
- Jarman, E.: 1987, 'The SAP Also Rises: A Critical Examination of the Anthropic Principle', Am. Phil. Quart. 24(4), 307-317.Google Scholar
- Eckhardt, W.: 1992, 'A Shooting-Room View of Doomsday', Journal of Philosophy 44(5), 248.Google Scholar
- Korb, K. and Oliver, J.: 1999, 'A Refutation of the Doomsday Argument', Mind 107, 403-10.Google Scholar
- Leslie, J.: 1997, 'Observer-Relative Chances and the Doomsday Argument', Inquiry 40, 427-436.Google Scholar
- Leslie, J.: 1996, The End of the World, The Ethics and Science of Human Extinction, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
- Leslie, J.: 1993, 'Doom and Probabilities', Mind 102(407), 489-491.Google Scholar
- Leslie, J.: 1992, 'Doomsday Revisited', Phil. Quart. 42(166), 85-87.Google Scholar
- Leslie, J.: 1989, Universes, Routledge, London.Google Scholar