Erkenntnis

, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 649–668

Different Roots of Human Intentionality in Mammalian Mentality

  • Hubert Hendrichs
Article
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

Five mental components of human intentionality are distinguished and related to different properties of mammalian orientation. It is proposed that, in the course of evolution, these old properties became integrated and thereby allowed for the development of a new quality: human orientation. The existence of more than 4,000 mammal species with their various forms and levels of mental organization, offering a panorama of different combinations of differently developed components of mentality, provide ample opportunities for comparative studies. The difficulties in assessing specific types are outlined, drawing on over 40 years of observation. Based on this knowledge, an argument is made for the importance of staying in contact with the empirical objects and of considering their ontological status when rising the standards of precision of formal analysis.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Brittan, G.: 1999, ‘The Secrets of Antelope’, Erkenntnis 51, 59-77.Google Scholar
  2. Chalmers, D. C.: 1996, The Conscious Mind. In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Cheney, D. L., R. M. Seyfarth: 1990a, How Monkeys See the World. Inside the Mind of Another Species. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  4. Cheney, D. L., R. M. Seyfarth: 1990b, ‘The Representation of Social Relations by Monkeys’, Cognition 37, 167-196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Condillac, E. B.: 1755, ‘Traité des Animaux, 1798’, in Oeuvres. Arnoux et Mousnier, Paris.Google Scholar
  6. Dennett, D. C.: 1987, The Intentional Stance MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  7. Donald, M.: 1991, Origins of the Modern Mind. Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London.Google Scholar
  8. Dretske, F.: 1999, ‘Machines, Plants, and Animals. The Origins of Agency’, Erkenntnis 51, 19-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Durner, M.: 1996, ‘Immateriality of Matter’, Theorien der Materie bei Priestley, Kant und Schopenhauer, Philosophisches Jahrbuch 103, 294-322.Google Scholar
  10. Edelmann, G. M.: 1989, The Remembered Past. A Biological Theory of Consciousness. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Gould, J. L. and C. G. Gould: 1994, The Animal Mind. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Hendrichs, H.: 1983, ‘On the Evolution of Social Structure in Mammals’, in J. F. Eisenberg and D. G. Kleinman (eds.), Advances in the Study of Mammalian Behavior. The American Society of Mammalogists Special Publications 7, 738-750.Google Scholar
  13. Hendrichs, H.: 1997, ‘On the Development of Psychosocial Individualities in Group Living Mammals’, in P. Weingart, S. D. Mitchell, P. J. Richerson and S. Maasen (eds.), Human by Nature. Between Biology and the Social Sciences. Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  14. Kim, J.: 1996, Philosophy of Mind. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
  15. König, J.: 1994, ‘Probleme des Begriffs der Entwicklung’, in G. Dahms (ed.), Kleine Schriften. Alber, Freiburg-München.Google Scholar
  16. Leakey, I. R. and R. Lewin: 1992, Origins Reconsidered. In Search of What Makes us Human. Doubleday, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Mayr, E.: 1974, ‘Teleological and Teleonomic’, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14, 91-117.Google Scholar
  18. Metzinger, T. (ed.): 1995, Bewuβtsein, Beiträge aus der Gegenwartsphilosophie. Schöningh, Paderborn.Google Scholar
  19. Pittendrigh, C. S.: 1958, ‘Adaptation, Natural Selection, and Behavior’, in A. Roe and G. G. Simpson (eds.), Behavior and Evolution. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  20. Premack, D.: 1983, ‘The Codes of Man and Beast’, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6, 125-167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Quante, M.: 1998, ‘Der Ort des Geistes. Neuere Beitrage zur Philosophie des Geistes’, Teil I', Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 52, 292-313.Google Scholar
  22. Radner, D. and M. Radner: 1989, Animal Consciousness. Prometheus, Buffalo, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Reimarus, H. S.: 1760, Allgemeine Betrachtungen über die Triebe der Thiere. Bohn, Hamburg.Google Scholar
  24. Searle, J. R.: 1983, Intentionality. An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  25. Sommer, V.: 1992, Lob der Lüge, Täuschung und Selbstbetrug bei Tier und Mensch. Beck, München.Google Scholar
  26. Stephan, A.: 1998, ‘Varieties of Emergence in Artificial and Natural Systems’, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C 53, 639-656.Google Scholar
  27. Witten, A. and R. Byrne: 1988, ‘Tactical Deception in Primates’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, 233-273.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hubert Hendrichs
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EthologyUniversity of BielefeldBielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations