Erkenntnis

, Volume 51, Issue 2–3, pp 233–241 | Cite as

Misadventures In Conditional Expectation: The Two-Envelope Problem

  • Carl G. Wagner

Abstract

Several fallacies of conditionalization are illustrated, using the two-envelope problem as a case in point

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bickel, P. and K. Doksum: 1977, Mathematical Statistics, Holden-Day, San Francisco, p. 6.Google Scholar
  2. Broome, J.: 1995, ‘The Two-Envelope Paradox’, Analysis 55(1), 6-11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chihara, C.: 1995, ‘The Mystery of Julius: A Paradox in Decision Theory’, Philosophical Studies 80, 1-16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jeffrey, R.: 1995, Probabilistic Thinking. Princeton University.Google Scholar
  5. Parzen, E.: 1960, Modern Probability Theory and its Applications, John Wiley, New York, p. 384.Google Scholar
  6. Savage, L.: 1954, The Foundations of Statistics, John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Zabell, S.: 1988, ‘Loss and Gain: The Exchange Paradox’, In: J. Bernardo et al. (eds.), Bayesian Statistics 3: Proceedings of the Third Valencia International Meeting. Oxford, pp. 233-236.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carl G. Wagner
    • 1
  1. 1.Mathematics DepartmentUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleU.S.A

Personalised recommendations