Human Studies

, Volume 22, Issue 2–4, pp 163–181 | Cite as

Discourse and Mind

  • Jeff Coulter

Abstract

In recent years, various attempts have been made to advance a project sometimes characterized as "discursive psychology". Grounded in what its proponents term "social constructionism", the discursive approach to the elucidation of 'mental' phenomena is here contrasted to an ethnomethodological position informed by the later work of Wittgenstein. In particular, it is argued that discursive psychology still contains Cartesian residua, notwithstanding its professed objective of expurgating Cartesian thought from the behavioral sciences. One principal issue has been the confusion of "conceptual analysis" with the empirical study of speech practices. If these distinct enterprises are conflated, the critical achievements of conceptual analysis are obscured or even misconstrued. A different picture of how best to analyze human conduct and mentality emerges if the lessons of Wittgensteinian grammatical analysis are preserved and extended, one more compatible with several themes in ethnomethodology.

References

  1. Bearn, G.C.F. (1997). Waking to Wonder: Wittgenstein's Existential Investigations. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bilmes, J. (1986). Discourse and Behavior. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bilmes, J. (1992). Referring to internal occurrences: A reply to Coulter. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 22 (3): 253-263.Google Scholar
  4. Coulter, J. (1983). Contingent and a priori structures in sequential anaylsis. Human Studies 6 (4): 361-376.Google Scholar
  5. Coulter, J. (1989). Mind in Action. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Coulter, J. (1992). Bilmes on 'Internal states': A critical commentary. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 22 (3): 239-253.Google Scholar
  7. Coulter, J. (1995). The Sacks Lectures. Human Studies 18 (2): 327-336.Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and Cognition. Thousand Oaks, Ca.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (1992). Discursive Psychology. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  11. Garfinkel, H. (1990). A conception of, and experiments with, 'trust' as a condition of stable, concerted actions. In J. Coulter (Ed.), Ethnomethodological Sociology. Aldershot, U.K.: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  12. Gergen, K.J. (1982). Toward Transformation in Social Knowledge. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. Harré, R. (1979). Social Being: A Theory for Social Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Harré, R. (1983). Personal Being: A Theory for Individual Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Harré, R and Gillett, G. (1994). The Discursive Mind. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hunter, J.F.M. (1985). Understanding Wittgenstein. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R.M. Farr and S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social Representations. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Sampson, E.E. (1988). The deconstruction of self. In J. Shotter and K. Gergen (Eds.), Texts of Identity.Google Scholar
  20. Shotter, J. (1984). Social Accountability and Selfhood. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Wittgenstein, L. (1968). Philosophical Investigations. (trans. G.E.M. Anscombe), New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On Certainty. In G.E.M. Anscombe and G.H. von Wright (Eds.), (trans. Dennis Paul and G.E.M. Anscombe), Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Zimmerman, D. and Pollner, P. (1990). The everyday world as a phenomenon. In J. Coulter (Ed.), Ethnomethodological Sociology. Aldershot, U.K.: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeff Coulter
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyBoston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations