International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 47–68 | Cite as

Dominance and its Behavioral Measures in a Captive Group of Bonobos (Pan paniscus)

  • H. Vervaecke
  • H. de Vries
  • L. van Elsacker
Article

Abstract

We investigated the existence of a social dominance hierarchy in the captive group of six adult bonobos at the Planckendael Zoo. We quantified the pattern of dyadic exchange of a number of behaviors to examine to what extent each behavior fits a linear rank order model. Following de Waal (1989), we distinguish three types of dominance: agonistic dominance, competitive ability and formal dominance. Fleeing upon aggression is a good measure of agonistic dominance. The agonistic dominance hierarchy in the study group shows significant and strong linearity. The rank order was: 1. female (22 yr), 2. female (15 yr)., 3. male (23 yr.), 4. female (15 yr.), 5. male (9 yr.), 6. male (10 yr.). As in the wild, the females occupy high ranks. There is prominent but nonexclusive female agonistic dominance. Teeth-baring does not fulfil the criteria of a formal submission signal. Peering is a request for tolerance of proximity. Since its direction within dyads is consistent with that of fleeing interactions, it is a useful additional measure to determine agonistic ranks in bonobos. In competitive situations, the females acquire more food than other group members do. The rank obtained from access to food resources differs from the agonistic rank due to female intrasexual social tolerance, expressed in food sharing. We typify the dominance styles in the group as female intrasexual tolerance and male challenging of rank differences. The agonistic rank order correlates significantly with age and has a strong predictive value for other social behaviors.

Pan paniscus agonistic dominance competitive ability formal dominance social tolerance dominance styles 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Alcock, J. (1984). Animal Behaviour: An Evolutionary Approach, 3rd. ed., Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  2. Altmann, S. A. (1974). Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods. Behaviour 49: 227-267.Google Scholar
  3. Appleby, M. C. (1983). The probability of linearity in hierarchies. Anim. Behav. 31: 600-608.Google Scholar
  4. de Vries, H. (1995). An improved test of linearity in dominance hierarchies containing unknown or tied relationships. Anim. Behav. 50: 1375-1389.Google Scholar
  5. de Vries, H., Netto, W. J., and Hanegraaf, P. L. H. (1993). Matman: A program for the analysis of sociometric matrices and behavioural transition matrices. Behaviour 125: 157-175.Google Scholar
  6. de Waal, F. B. M. (1982). Chimpanzee Politics, Jonathan Cape, London.Google Scholar
  7. de Waal, F. B. M. (1987). Tension regulation and nonreproductive functions of sex in captive bonobos (Pan paniscus). Natl. Geogr. Res. 3: 318-335.Google Scholar
  8. de Waal, F. B. M. (1988). The communicative repertoire of captive bonobos (Pan paniscus) compared to that of chimpanzees. Behaviour 106: 183-251.Google Scholar
  9. de Waal, F. B. M. (1989). Dominance ''style'' and primate social organization. In Standen, V., and Foley, R. A. (eds.), Comparative Socioecology, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 243-264.Google Scholar
  10. de Waal, F. B. M. (1992). Appeasement, celebration, and food sharing in the two Pan species. In Nishida, T. (ed.), Human Origins, Topics in Primatology. Vol. 1, Tokyo University Press, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  11. de Waal, F. B. M. (1996). Good Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massechusetts, p. 296.Google Scholar
  12. de Waal, F. B. M. (1997). Bonobo: De vergeten mensaap: Natuur en Techniek. Beek, Nederland. p. 210.Google Scholar
  13. de Waal, F. B. M., and Luttrell, L. M. (1985). The formal hierarchy of rhesus monkeys: An investigation of the bared-teeth display. Am. J. Primatol. 9: 73-85.Google Scholar
  14. Drews, C. (1993). The concept and definition of dominance in animal behaviour. Behaviour 125: 283-311.Google Scholar
  15. Franz, C. (1998). Female Dominance and Related Behaviour Patterns in Bonobos (Pan paniscus), Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Austria. Dissertation.Google Scholar
  16. Fruth, B., and Hohmann, G. (1997). Sociality in Bonobos: the Males' Role. Paper presented at the First Göttinger Freilandtage on Primate socioecology: Causes and consequences of variation in the number of males per group. Deutsches PrimatenZentrum, 9-12 December 1997.Google Scholar
  17. Furuichi, T. (1989). Social interactions and the life history of female Pan paniscus in Wamba, Zaïre. Int. J. Primatol. 10: 173-197.Google Scholar
  18. Furuichi, T. (1992). Dominance Relations Among Wild Bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba, Zaïre. Abstracts of the XIVth Congress of the International Primatological Society, Strassbourg, 16-22 August, France. Abstract 301.Google Scholar
  19. Furuichi, T. (1997). Agonistic interactions and matrifocal dominance rank of wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba. Int. J. Primatol. 18: 855-875.Google Scholar
  20. Furuichi, T., and Ihobe, H. (1994). Variation in male relationships in bonobos and chimpanzees. Behaviour. 130: 211-228.Google Scholar
  21. Goodall, J. (1986). The chimpanzees of Gombe, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  22. Hinde, R. A. (1974). Biological Bases of Human Social Behaviour, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Hohmann, G., and Fruth, B. (1993). Field observations on meat sharing among bonobos (Pan paniscus). Folia Primatol. 60: 225-229.Google Scholar
  24. Hohmann, G., and Fruth, B. (1996). Food sharing in wild bonobos (Pan paniscus): The sex for food hypothesis reviewed. Primate Rep. 44: 22.Google Scholar
  25. Idani, G. (1991). Social relationships between immigrant and resident bonobo (Pan paniscus) females at Wamba Folia primatol. 57: 83-95.Google Scholar
  26. Ihobe, H. (1992). Male-male relationships among wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba, Republic of Zaire. Primates 33: 163-179.Google Scholar
  27. Jordan, C. (1977). Das Verhalten Zoolebender Zwergschimpansen, Inaugural Dissertation, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe Universität zu Frankfurt am Main, Fronkfurt, Germany.Google Scholar
  28. Jungers, W. L., and Susman, R. L. (1984). Body size and skeletal allometry in African apes. In Susman, R.L. (ed.), The Pygmy Chimpanzee, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 131-178.Google Scholar
  29. Kano, T. (1980). Social behavior of wild pygmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus) at Wamba: A preliminary report. J. Hum. Evol. 9: 243-260.Google Scholar
  30. Kano, T. (1992). The Last Ape: Pygmy Chimpanzee Behavior and Ecology, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.Google Scholar
  31. Kano, T. (1996). Male rank order and copulation rate in a unit-group of bonobos at Wamba, Zaire. In McGrew, W. C., Marchant, L. F., and T. Nishida, Great Ape Societies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 135-145.Google Scholar
  32. Kappeler, P. (1993). Female dominance in primates and other mammals. In Bateson P. P. G. et al. (eds.), Perspectives in Ethology, Vol. 10: Behavior and Evolution, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Kuroda, S. (1984). Interactions over food among pygmy chimpanzees. In Susman, R. L. (ed.), The Pygmy Chimpanzee, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 301-324.Google Scholar
  34. Leus, K., and van Puijenbroeck. (1996). Studbook of the Bonobo (Pan paniscus), Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp, Belgium.Google Scholar
  35. Martin, P., and Bateson, P. (1993). (2.ed.) Measuring Behaviour, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  36. Nishida, T. (1979). The social structure of chimpanzees of the Mahale mountains. In Hamburg, D. A., and McCown, E. R. (eds.), The Great Apes, Benjamin Cummings Publishing Company, Menlo Park, California, pp. 73-121.Google Scholar
  37. Nishida, T. (1989). Social interactions between resident and immigrant female chimpanzees. In Heltne, P. G., and Marquardt, L. A. (eds.), Understanding Chimpanzees, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 68-89.Google Scholar
  38. Noë, R., de Waal, F. B. M., and van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (1980). Types of dominance in a chimpanzee colony. Folia Primatol. 34: 90-110.Google Scholar
  39. Parish, A. R. (1994). Sex and food control in the uncommon chimpanzee: How bonobo females overcome a phylogenetic legacy of male dominance. Ethol. Sociobiol. 15: 157-179.Google Scholar
  40. Parish, A. R. (1996). Female relationships in bonobos (Pan paniscus). Hum. Nat. 7: 61-96.Google Scholar
  41. Pusey, A., Williams, J., and Goodall, J. (1997). The influence of dominance rank on the reproductive success of female chimpanzees. Science 227: 829-831.Google Scholar
  42. Richards, S. M. (1974). The concept of dominance and methods of assessment. Anim. Behav. 22: 914-930.Google Scholar
  43. Rowell, T. E. (1974). The concept of social dominance. Behav. Biol. 11: 131-154.Google Scholar
  44. Stanford, C. B. (1998). The social behavior of chimpanzees and bonobos. Curr. Anthropol. 39: 399-420.Google Scholar
  45. Syme, G. J. (1974). Competitive orders as measures of social dominance. Anim. Behav. 22: 931-940.Google Scholar
  46. van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M., and Wensing, J. A. B. (1987). Dominance and its behavioral measures in a captive wolf pack. In Frank, H. W. (ed.), Man and Wolf, Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 219-252.Google Scholar
  47. Vervaecke, H., de Vries, H., and van Elsacker, L. (1999). An experimental evaluation of the consistency of competitive ability and agonistic dominance in different social contexts in captive bonobos (Pan paniscus). Behaviour 136: 423-442.Google Scholar
  48. Vervaecke, H., de Vries, H., van Elsacker, L., and Verheyen, R. Support in conflict in captive bonobos. (In prep a).Google Scholar
  49. Vervaecke, H., de Vries, H., and van Elsacker, L., and Verheyen, R. (In prep b). The pivotal role of rank in grooming and support behavior in a captive group of bonobos (Pan paniscus).Google Scholar
  50. Vervaecke, H., van Elsacker, L., and Verheyen, R. F. (1996). The Power of Bonding in Bonobos. XVIth Congress of the International Primatological Society. 11-16 August, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  51. White, F. (1992). Food sharing in wild pygmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus). In Roeder, J. J., Thierry, B., Anderson, J. R., Herrenschmidt, N. (eds.), Current Primatology, Vol. 2, Social Development, Learning and Behavior, Université Louis Pasteur, Strassbourg, France, pp. 1-10.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Vervaecke
    • 1
  • H. de Vries
    • 2
  • L. van Elsacker
    • 3
  1. 1.Dep. of Biology, EthologyUniversity of AntwerpWilrijkBelgium
  2. 2.Ethology and Socio-ecology GroupUniversity of UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Royal Zoological Society of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium

Personalised recommendations