Human Studies

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 347–360 | Cite as

Ethnography, Institutions, and the Problematic of the Everyday World

  • Peter R. Grahame

Abstract

This essay describes institutional ethnography as a method of inquiry pioneered by Dorothy E. Smith, and introduces a collection of papers which make distinctive contributions to the development of this novel form of investigation. Institutional ethnography is presented as a research strategy which emerges from Smith's wide-ranging explorations of the problematic of the everyday world. Smith's conception of the everyday world as problematic involves a critical departure from the concepts and procedures of more conventional sociologies. She argues for an alternative sociology which begins with the standpoint of the actor in everyday life, rather than from within a professional sociological discourse aligned with the society's ruling institutions. The familiar sociologies of everyday life do not suffice for this purpose, since they deal with local settings and social worlds, but stop short of examining how these are knitted into broader forms of social organization. In contrast, institutional ethnography examines how the scenes of everyday life are shaped by forms of social organization which cannot be fully grasped from within those scenes. The principal tasks of institutional ethnography include describing the coordination of activities in the everyday world, discovering how ideological accounts define those activities in relation to institutional imperatives, and examining the broader social relations in which local sites of activity are embedded. The four papers which follow demonstrate that specific contributions to institutional ethnography can be made in relation to a wide array of topics, methods, and interests.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abercrombie, Nicholas, Stephen Hill, and Bryan S. Turner (1984). The Penguin Dictionary of Sociology. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
  2. Burawoy, Michael (1998). The Extended Case Method. Sociological Theory 16(1): 4–33.Google Scholar
  3. Foucault, Michel (1977). Discipline and Punish. N.Y.: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Foucault, Michel (1978). The History of Sexuality, Volume 1. An Introduction. N.Y.: Random House.Google Scholar
  5. Garfinkel, Harold (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Goffman, Erving (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. N.Y.: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  7. Goffman, Erving (1963). Interaction Ritual. N.Y.: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  8. Griffith, Alison I. (1984). Ideology, Education, and Single Parent Families: The Normative Ordering of Families Through Schooling. University of Toronto (unpublished Ph.D. thesis).Google Scholar
  9. Habermas, Jürgen (1971). Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  10. Habermas, Jürgen (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume I. Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hammersley, Martin, and Paul Atkinson (1995). Ethnography: Principles in Practice. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Heap, James L. (1995). “Foreword.” In Marie Campbell and Ann Manicom (Eds.), Knowledge, Experience, and Ruling Relations: Studies in the Social Organization of Knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  13. Liebow, Elliot (1967). Tally's Corner, A Study of Negro Streetcorner Men. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  14. MacLeod, Jay (1995). Ain't No Makin'It, Aspirations and Attainment in a Low-Income Neighborhood. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  15. McCall, Michal M. (1996). Postmodernism and Social Inquiry. Symbolic Interaction 19(4): 363–365.Google Scholar
  16. Mann, Susan A. and Lori R. Kelley (1997). Standing at the Crossroads of Modernist Thought: Collins, Smith, and the New Feminist Epistemologies. Gender & Society 11(4): 391–408.Google Scholar
  17. Smith, Dorothy E. (1987). The Everyday World as Problematic, A Feminist Sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  18. Smith, Dorothy E. (1990a). The Conceptual Practices of Power, A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  19. Smith, Dorothy E. (1990b). Texts, Facts, and Femininity: Exploring the Relations of Ruling. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Smith, Dorothy E. (1996). Telling the Truth After Postmodernism. Symbolic Interaction 19(3): 171–202.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, Dorothy E. (1997). Response to Susan Mann and Lori Kelley. Gender & Society 11(6): 819–821.Google Scholar
  22. Smith, Dorothy E. (1998). Writing the Social: Critique, Theory, Investigations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  23. Willis, Paul (1977). Learning to Labor. Westmead: Saxon House.Google Scholar
  24. Zimmerman, Don H., and Melvin Pollner (1970). The Everyday World as Phenomenon. In Jack D. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding Everyday Life, Towards the Reconstruction of Sociological Knowledge. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter R. Grahame

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations