Climatic Change

, Volume 41, Issue 3–4, pp 547–581

Towards the Construction of Climate Change Scenarios

  • John F. B. Mitchell
  • T. C. Johns
  • M. Eagles
  • W. J. Ingram
  • R. A. Davis


Climate impacts assessments need regional scenarios of climate change for a wide range of projected emissions. General circulation models (GCMs) are the most promising approach to providing such information, but as yet there is considerable uncertainty in their regional projections and they are still too costly to run for a large number of emission scenarios. Simpler models have been used to estimate global-mean temperature changes under a range of scenarios. In this paper we investigate whether a fixed pattern from a GCM experiment scaled by global-mean temperature changes from a simple model provides an acceptable estimate of the regional climate change over a range of scenarios. Changes estimated using this approximate approach are evaluated by comparing them with results from ensembles of a coupled ocean-atmosphere model. Five specific emissions scenarios are considered. For increases in greenhouse gases only, the 'error' in annual mean temperature for the cases considered is smaller than the sampling error due to the model's internal variability. The method may break down for scenarios of stabilisation of concentrations, because the patterns change as the model approaches equilibrium. The inclusion of large local perturbations due to sulphate aerosols can lead to significant deviations of the temperature pattern from that obtained using greenhouse gases alone. Combining separate patterns for the responses to greenhouse gases and aerosols may improve the accuracy of approximation. Finally, the accuracy of the scaling approach is more difficult to assess for deriving changes in regional precipitation because many of the regional changes are not statistically significant in the climate change projections considered here. If precipitation changes are only marginally significant in other models, the apparent disagreement between different models may be as much due to sampling error as to genuine differences in model response.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alcamo, J. (ed.): 1994, 'Image 2.0: Integrated Modelling of Global Climate Change', Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  2. Barnett, T. P., Schlesinger, M. E., and Xingjian Jiang: 1991, 'On Greenhouse Gas Signal Detection Strategies', in Schlesinger, M. E. (ed.), Greenhouse-Gas-Induced Climatic Change: A Critical Appraisal of Simulations and Observations, Development in Atmospheric Science, Elsevier, Amsterdam, New York, pp. 538-558.Google Scholar
  3. Cess, R. D, Potter, G. L., Blanchet, J. P., Boer, G. A., Del Genio, A. D., Deque, M., Dymnikov, V., Galin, V., Gates, W. L., Ghan, S. J., Kiehl, J. T., Lacis, A. A., le Treut, H., Li, Z.-X., Liang, X.-Z., MacAvaney, B. J., Meleshko, V. P., Mitchell, J. F. B., Morcrette, J. J., Randall, D. A., Rikus, L., Roeckner, E., Royer, J. F., Schlese, U., Scheinin, D. A., Slingo, A., Sokolov, A. P., Taylor, K. E., Washington, W. M., Wetherald, R. T., Yagai, I., and Zhang, M.-H.: 1990, 'Intercomparison and Interpretation of Climate Feedback Processes in 19 Atmospheric General Circulation Models', J. Geophys. Res. 95, 16601-16615.Google Scholar
  4. Cubasch, U., Santer, B. D., Hellbach, A., Hegerl, G. C., Hock, H., Maier-Reimer, E., Mikolajewicz, U., Stossel, A., and Voss, R.: 1994, 'Monte Carlo Climate Change Forecasts with a Global Coupled Ocean Atmosphere Climate Model', Clim. Dyn. 10, 1-19.Google Scholar
  5. Gates, L.W.: 1992, AMIP, 'The A tmospheric Model Intercomparision Project', Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 73, 1962-1970.Google Scholar
  6. Grotch, S. L. and McCracken, M. C.: 1991, 'The Use of General Circulation Models to Predict Climate Change', J. Climate 4, 286-303.Google Scholar
  7. Hegerl, G. C., Hasselmann, K., Cubasch, U., Mitchell, J. F. B., Rodhe, H., Roeckner, E., Voss R., and Waskewitz, J.: 1997, 'On Multi-Fingerprint Detection and Attribution of Greenhouse Gas and Aerosol Forced Climate Change', Clim. Dyn, 13, 613-634.Google Scholar
  8. Hourcade, J.-C. and Chapuis, T.: 1995, 'No-Regret Potentials and Technical Innovation. A Viability Approach to Integrated Assessment of Climate Policies', Energy Policy 21, 433-445.Google Scholar
  9. Hulme, M., Raper, S. C. B., and Wigley, T. M. L.: 1995, 'An Integrated Framework to Address Climate Change (ESCAPE) and Further Developments of the Global and Regional Climate Modules (MAGICC)', Energy Policy 23, 347-355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hulme, M. and Brown, O.: 1998, 'Portraying Climate Scenario Uncertainties in Relation to “Tolerable” Regional Climate Change', Clim. Res. 10, 1-14.Google Scholar
  11. Jonas, M., Fleschmann, J., Ganopolski, A. V., Krabec, J., Sauer, U., Olendrzynski, K., Petoukov, V. K., and Shaw, R. W.: 1996, 'Gird Point Surface Air Temperature Calculations with a Fast Turnaround: Combining the Results of IMAGE and a GCM', Clim. Change 34, 479-512.Google Scholar
  12. Ingram, W. J., Wilson, C. A., and Mitchell, J. F. B.: 1989, 'Modelling Climate Change: An Assessment of Sea-Ice and Surface Albedo Feedbacks', J. Geophys. Res. 94, 8609-8622.Google Scholar
  13. Johns, T. C., Carnell, R. E., Crossley, J. F., Gregory, J. M., Mitchell, J. F. B., Senior, C. A., Tett, S. F. B., and Wood, R. A.: 1997, 'The Second Hadley Centre Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere GCM: Model Description, Spinup and Validation', Clim. Dyn. 13, 103-134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kattenberg, A., Giorgi, F., Grassl, H., Meehl, G. A., Mitchell, J. F. B., Stouffer, R. J., Tokioka, T., Weaver, A. J., and Wigley, T. M. L.: 1996, 'Climate Models — Projections of Future Climate', in Houghton, J. T., Meira Filho, L. G., Callander, B. A., Harris, N., Kattenberg, A., and Maskell, K. (eds.), Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change The Second Assessment Report of the IPCC: Contribution of Working Group I, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp. 285-357.Google Scholar
  15. Keen, A. and Murphy, J. M.: 1997, 'An Analysis of the “Cold Start” Problem in Transient CO2 Experiments', Clim. Dyn. 13, 847-864.Google Scholar
  16. Langner J. and Rodhe, H.: 1991, 'A Global Three-Dimensional Model of the Tropospheric Sulfur Cycle', J. Atmos. Chem. 13, 225-263.Google Scholar
  17. Leggett, J., Pepper, W. J. and Stewart, R. J.: 1992, 'Emissions Scenarios for the IPCC: An Update', in Houghton, J. T., Callander, B. A, and Varney, S. K. (eds.), Climate Change 1992: Supplement to IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp. 69-95.Google Scholar
  18. Meehl, G. A., Boer, G., Covey, C., Latif, M., and Stouffer, R. J.: 1997, 'Intercomparison Makes for a Better Climate Model', EOS 78, 445-446.Google Scholar
  19. Mitchell, J. F. B., Manabe, S., Meleshko, V., and Tokioka, T.: 1990, 'Equilibrium Climate Change — and its Implications for the Future', in Houghton, J. T., Jenkins, G. S., and Ephraums, J. J. (eds.), Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp. 131-170.Google Scholar
  20. Mitchell, J. F. B. and Gregory, J. M.: 1992, 'Climatic Consequences of Emissions and a Comparison of IS92a and SA90', in Houghton, J. T., Callander, B. A., and Varney, S. K. (eds.), Climate Change 1992: Supplement to IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp. 171-175.Google Scholar
  21. Mitchell, J. F. B. and Johns, T. C.: 1997, 'On the Modification of Greenhouse Warming by Sulphate Aerosols', J. Climate 10, 245-267.Google Scholar
  22. Mitchell, J. F. B., Johns, T. C., Gregory, J. M., and Tett, S. F. B.: 1995, 'Climate Response to Increasing Levels of Greenhouse Gases and Sulphate Aerosols', Nature 376, 501-504.Google Scholar
  23. Murphy, J. M. and Mitchell, J. F. B.: 1995, 'Transient Response of the Hadley Centre Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model to Increasing Carbon Dioxide. Part II, Spatial and Temporal Structure of Response', J. Climate 8, 57-80.Google Scholar
  24. Oglesby, R. J. and Saltzman, B.: 1992, 'Equilibrium Climate Statistics of a General Circulation Model as a Function of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. Part I', J. Climate 5, 66-92.Google Scholar
  25. Raisanen, J.: 1997, 'An Intercomparison of the Zonally Symmetric and Asymmetric CO2 Induced Change in Some GCM Experiments', Clim. Dyn. submitted.Google Scholar
  26. Santer, B. D., Wigley, T. M. L., Schlesinger, M. E., and Mitchell, J. F. B.: 1990, 'Developing Climate Scenarios from Equilibrium GCM Results', Technical Note 47, Max Planck Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, p. 29.Google Scholar
  27. Santer, B. D., Taylor, K. E., Wigley, T. M. L., Johns, T. C., Jones, P. D., Karoly, D. J., Mitchell, J. F. B., Oort, A. H., Penner, J. E., Ramaswamy, V., Schwarzkopf, M. D., Stouffer, R. J., and Tett, S. F. B.: 1996, 'A Search for Human Influences on the Thermal Structure of the Atmosphere', Nature 384, 39-46.Google Scholar
  28. Schimel, D., Enting, I., Heimann, M., Wigley, T. M. L., Raynaud, D., Alves D., and Siegenthaler, U.: 1995, 'CO2 and the Carbon Cycle', in Houghton, J. T., Meira Filho, L. G., Bruce, J., Hoesung Lee, Callander, B. A., Haites, E., Harris, N., and Maskell, K. (eds.), Climate Change 1994: Radiative Forcing of Climate Change and an Evaluation of the IPCC IS92 Emission Scenarios, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., p. 339.Google Scholar
  29. Schimel, D., Grubb, M., Fortunat, J., Kaufmann, R., Moss, R., Ogana, W., Richels, R., and Wigley, T.: 1997, 'Stabilization of Atmospheric Greenhouse Gases: Physical, Biological and Socio-economic Considerations', IPCC Technical Paper III, p. 54.Google Scholar
  30. Schlesinger, M. E., Andronova, N., Ghanem, A., Malyshev, S., Reichler, T., Rozanov, E., Wang, W., and Yang, F.: 1997, 'Geographical Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas and Anthropogenic Aerosol Induced Climate Changes, Report of the Climate Research Group', Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana, Champaign, p. 86.Google Scholar
  31. Senior C. A., and Mitchell, J. F. B.: 1993, 'CO2 and Climate; The Impact of Cloud Parametrizations', J. Climate 6, 393-418.Google Scholar
  32. Shine, K. P., Fouquart, Y., and Ramaswamy, V.: 1996, 'Radiative Forcing', in Houghton, J. T., Meira Filho, L. G., Callander, B. A., Harris, N., Kattenberg, A., and Maskell, K. (eds.), Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change The Second Assessment Report of The IPCC: Contribution of Working Group I, Cambridge Univesity Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp. 108-118.Google Scholar
  33. Stouffer, R. J., Manabe, S., and Bryan, K.: 1989, 'Interhemispheric Asymmetry in Climate Response to an Increase of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide', Nature 342, 660-662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stott, P. and Tett, S. F. B.: 1998, 'Scale Dependence of Climate Change Detection', J. Climate, in press.Google Scholar
  35. Taylor, K. and Penner, J. E.: 1994, 'Climate System Response to Aerosols and Greenhouse Gases: A Model Study', Nature 369, 734-737.Google Scholar
  36. Tett, S. F. B., Mitchell, J. F. B., Parker, D. E., and Allen, M. R.: 1996, 'Human Influence on the Atmospheric Vertical Temperature Structure: Detection and Observations', Science 274, 1170-1173.Google Scholar
  37. Tett, S. F. B., Johns, T. C., and Mitchell, J. F. B.: 1997, 'Global and Regional Variability in a Coupled AOGCM', Clim. Dyn. 13, 303-323.Google Scholar
  38. Watson, R. T., Zinyowera, M. C., and Moss, R. H. (eds.): 1996, Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific-Technical Analysis. Contribution of the Working Group II to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., p. 897.Google Scholar
  39. WEC (World Energy Council) and IIASA (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis): 1995, Global Energy Perspectives to 2050 and Beyond, World Energy Council, London.Google Scholar
  40. Wigley, T. M. L. and Raper, S. C. B.: 1992, 'Implications for Climate and Sea-level of Revised IPCC Emissions Scenarios', Nature 357, 293-300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • John F. B. Mitchell
    • 1
  • T. C. Johns
    • 1
  • M. Eagles
    • 1
  • W. J. Ingram
    • 1
  • R. A. Davis
    • 1
  1. 1.Meteorological OfficeHadley Centre for Climate Prediction and ResearchBracknessU.K.

Personalised recommendations