Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 327–366 | Cite as

The Myth of Conventional Implicature

  • Kent Bach


Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic Conventional Implicature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bach, K.: 1987, Thought and Reference, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Bach, K.: 1994, 'Conversational Impliciture', Mind and Language 9, 124–162.Google Scholar
  3. Bach, K. and and R. Harnish: 1979, Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Bach, K. and R. Harnish: 1992, 'How Performatives Really Work', Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 93–110.Google Scholar
  5. Barker, S.: 1993, 'Even, Still, and Counterfactuals', Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 1–38.Google Scholar
  6. Bellert, I.: 1977, 'On Semantic and Distributional Properties of Sentential Adverbs', Linguistic Inquiry 8, 337–351.Google Scholar
  7. Blakemore, D.: 1990, 'Performatives and Parentheticals', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91, 197–213.Google Scholar
  8. Boër, S. and W. Lycan: 1976, The Myth of Semantic Presupposition, Indiana Linguistics Club, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
  9. Cappelen, H. and E. Lepore: 1997, 'Varieties of Quotation', Mind 106, 429–450.Google Scholar
  10. Espinal, T.: 1991, 'The Representation of Disjunct Constituents', Language 67, 726–762.Google Scholar
  11. Fabb, N.: 1990, 'The Difference between English Restrictive and Nonrestrictive Relative Clauses', Journal of Linguistics 26, 57–78.Google Scholar
  12. Francescotti, R.: 1995, 'Even: The Conventional Implicature Approach Reconsidered', Linguistics and Philosophy 18, 153–173.Google Scholar
  13. Fraser, B.: 1996, 'Pragmatic Markers', Pragmatics 6, 167–190.Google Scholar
  14. Frege, G.: 1892/1994, 'On Sense and Reference', in R. Harnish (ed.), Basic Topics in the Philosophy of Language, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 142–160.Google Scholar
  15. Frege, G.: 1918/1994, 'The Thought: A Logical Inquiry', in R. Harnish (ed.), Basic Topics in the Philosophy of Language, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 517–535.Google Scholar
  16. Grice, P.: 1961, 'The Causal Theory of Perception', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. Vol. 35, pp. 121–52.Google Scholar
  17. Grice, P.: 1989, Studies in the Way of Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  18. Harnish, R.: 1994, 'Mood, Meaning, and Speech Acts', in S. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Foundations of Speech Act Theory, Routledge, London, pp. 407–459.Google Scholar
  19. Kaplan, D.: 1977/1989, 'Demonstratives', in J. Almog, H. Wettstein, and J. Perry (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 481–563.Google Scholar
  20. Karttunen, L. and S. Peters: 1979, 'Conventional Implicature', in C-K Oh and D. Dineen (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 11: Presupposition, Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–56.Google Scholar
  21. King, J.: 1995, 'Structured Propositions and Complex Predicates', Noûs 29, 516–535.Google Scholar
  22. Lambrecht, K.: 1994, Information Structure and Sentence Form, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  23. Levinson, S.: 1983, Pragmatics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  24. Neale, S.: 1992, 'Paul Grice and the Philosophy of Language', Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 509–559.Google Scholar
  25. Recanati, F.: 1988, 'The Pragmatics of What is Said', Mind and Language 4, 295–329.Google Scholar
  26. Rieber, S.: 1997, 'Conventional Implicatures as Higher Performatives', Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 51–72.Google Scholar
  27. Sperber, D. and D. Wilson: 1986, Relevance, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  28. Stainton, R.: 1995, 'Non-sentential Assertions and Semantic Ellipsis', Linguistics and Philosophy 18, 291–296.Google Scholar
  29. Wilson, D. and D. Sperber: 1993, 'Linguistic Form and Relevance', Lingua 90, 1–25.Google Scholar
  30. Ziff, P.: 1972, 'What is Said', in G. Harman and D. Davidson (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 709–721.Google Scholar
  31. Zwicky, A.: 1971, 'On Reported Speech', in C. Fillmore and T. Langendoen (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Semantics, Holt, Reinhart, and Winston, New York, pp. 72–77.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kent Bach
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophySan Francisco State UniversitySan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations