Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 327–366 | Cite as

The Myth of Conventional Implicature

  • Kent Bach
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bach, K.: 1987, Thought and Reference, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Bach, K.: 1994, 'Conversational Impliciture', Mind and Language 9, 124–162.Google Scholar
  3. Bach, K. and and R. Harnish: 1979, Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Bach, K. and R. Harnish: 1992, 'How Performatives Really Work', Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 93–110.Google Scholar
  5. Barker, S.: 1993, 'Even, Still, and Counterfactuals', Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 1–38.Google Scholar
  6. Bellert, I.: 1977, 'On Semantic and Distributional Properties of Sentential Adverbs', Linguistic Inquiry 8, 337–351.Google Scholar
  7. Blakemore, D.: 1990, 'Performatives and Parentheticals', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91, 197–213.Google Scholar
  8. Boër, S. and W. Lycan: 1976, The Myth of Semantic Presupposition, Indiana Linguistics Club, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
  9. Cappelen, H. and E. Lepore: 1997, 'Varieties of Quotation', Mind 106, 429–450.Google Scholar
  10. Espinal, T.: 1991, 'The Representation of Disjunct Constituents', Language 67, 726–762.Google Scholar
  11. Fabb, N.: 1990, 'The Difference between English Restrictive and Nonrestrictive Relative Clauses', Journal of Linguistics 26, 57–78.Google Scholar
  12. Francescotti, R.: 1995, 'Even: The Conventional Implicature Approach Reconsidered', Linguistics and Philosophy 18, 153–173.Google Scholar
  13. Fraser, B.: 1996, 'Pragmatic Markers', Pragmatics 6, 167–190.Google Scholar
  14. Frege, G.: 1892/1994, 'On Sense and Reference', in R. Harnish (ed.), Basic Topics in the Philosophy of Language, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 142–160.Google Scholar
  15. Frege, G.: 1918/1994, 'The Thought: A Logical Inquiry', in R. Harnish (ed.), Basic Topics in the Philosophy of Language, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 517–535.Google Scholar
  16. Grice, P.: 1961, 'The Causal Theory of Perception', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. Vol. 35, pp. 121–52.Google Scholar
  17. Grice, P.: 1989, Studies in the Way of Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  18. Harnish, R.: 1994, 'Mood, Meaning, and Speech Acts', in S. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Foundations of Speech Act Theory, Routledge, London, pp. 407–459.Google Scholar
  19. Kaplan, D.: 1977/1989, 'Demonstratives', in J. Almog, H. Wettstein, and J. Perry (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 481–563.Google Scholar
  20. Karttunen, L. and S. Peters: 1979, 'Conventional Implicature', in C-K Oh and D. Dineen (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 11: Presupposition, Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–56.Google Scholar
  21. King, J.: 1995, 'Structured Propositions and Complex Predicates', Noûs 29, 516–535.Google Scholar
  22. Lambrecht, K.: 1994, Information Structure and Sentence Form, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  23. Levinson, S.: 1983, Pragmatics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  24. Neale, S.: 1992, 'Paul Grice and the Philosophy of Language', Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 509–559.Google Scholar
  25. Recanati, F.: 1988, 'The Pragmatics of What is Said', Mind and Language 4, 295–329.Google Scholar
  26. Rieber, S.: 1997, 'Conventional Implicatures as Higher Performatives', Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 51–72.Google Scholar
  27. Sperber, D. and D. Wilson: 1986, Relevance, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  28. Stainton, R.: 1995, 'Non-sentential Assertions and Semantic Ellipsis', Linguistics and Philosophy 18, 291–296.Google Scholar
  29. Wilson, D. and D. Sperber: 1993, 'Linguistic Form and Relevance', Lingua 90, 1–25.Google Scholar
  30. Ziff, P.: 1972, 'What is Said', in G. Harman and D. Davidson (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 709–721.Google Scholar
  31. Zwicky, A.: 1971, 'On Reported Speech', in C. Fillmore and T. Langendoen (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Semantics, Holt, Reinhart, and Winston, New York, pp. 72–77.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kent Bach
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophySan Francisco State UniversitySan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations